Interdependencies between Activities Clause Samples

Interdependencies between Activities. The development of innovative components in the research activity will be driven by the technology architecture definition and gap analysis performed in the service activities. This analysis will focus on addressing the needs and feed-­‐ back of production grid infrastructure users and system administrators collected by the network activities, as illustrated in Figure 7. Each activity has a defined set of responsibilities and no duplication exists be-­ tween the activities. Yet, the interrelations between the activities will ensure a cohesive realisation of the project plan and the dependencies between each ac-­‐ tivity have been captured via project deliverables. This strategy, coupled with standard proactive monitoring and regular communication, will provide ad-­‐ equate tool for a clear and efficient project management and provide measurable advancement of the project to its stakeholders, including the Commission. The Interaction with Targeted Communities activity (WP2) will be the main gate to the communities that StratusLab specifically targets. This unique interlocutor will improve the efficiency and quality of communication with these users. The feedback from these interactions will be analysed and channelled to the Software Integration and Distribution activity (WP4) regarding software related topics and to the Infrastructure Operations activity (WP5) regarding operations and infrastructure deployment topics. These two SA activities will take these inputs into account to drive its support work and provide solutions and answers back to WP2 for delivery to the users. Another important outward facing relationship is with projects and entities with which our toolkit will integrate and interact. These are the standard bodies, re-­‐ lated projects and middleware providers. The Dissemination activity (WP3) will be responsible for this interface. Distributed computing, including grid and cloud computing, is a fast moving technology. It is therefore important, even for a rela-­‐ tively short duration project, to keep a constant pulse of the market and its play-­‐ ers. WP3 will provide representation, in collaboration with the Project Manage-­‐ ment activity (WP1), in relevant European and international events and cultivate relationships with potential partners, software component providers and poten-­‐ tial new user communities. This activity will interface with WP4 to ensure that the components that are selected and integrated in the StratusLab toolkit are...
View Source

Related to Interdependencies between Activities

  • Dependencies HP’s ability to deliver services will depend on Customer’s reasonable and timely cooperation and the accuracy and completeness of any information from Customer needed to deliver the services.

  • Trunk Group Connections and Ordering 5.2.1 For both One-Way and Two-Way Interconnection Trunks, if Onvoy wishes to use a technically feasible interface other than a DS1 or a DS3 facility at the POI, the Parties shall negotiate reasonable terms and conditions (including, without limitation, rates and implementation timeframes) for such arrangement; and, if the Parties cannot agree to such terms and conditions (including, without limitation, rates and implementation timeframes), either Party may utilize the Agreement’s dispute resolution procedures. 5.2.2 When One-Way or Two-Way Interconnection Trunks are provisioned using a DS3 interface facility, if Onvoy orders the multiplexed DS3 facilities to a Frontier Central Office that is not designated in the NECA 4 Tariff as the appropriate Intermediate Hub location (i.e., the Intermediate Hub location in the appropriate Tandem subtending area based on the LERG), and the provision of such facilities to the subject Central Office is technically feasible, the Parties shall negotiate in good faith reasonable terms and conditions (including, without limitation, rates and implementation timeframes) for such arrangement; and, if the Parties cannot agree to such terms and conditions (including, without limitation, rates and implementation timeframes), either Party may utilize the Agreement’s dispute resolution procedures. 5.2.3 Each Party will identify its Carrier Identification Code, a three or four digit numeric code obtained from Telcordia, to the other Party when ordering a trunk group. 5.2.4 For multi-frequency (MF) signaling each Party will out pulse ten (10) digits to the other Party, unless the Parties mutually agree otherwise. 5.2.5 Each Party will use commercially reasonable efforts to monitor trunk groups under its control and to augment those groups using generally accepted trunk- engineering standards so as to not exceed blocking objectives. Each Party agrees to use modular trunk-engineering techniques for trunks subject to this Attachment.

  • Monitoring Activities The Cheyenne MPO shall have the right to monitor all activities related to this Agreement that are performed by the Consultant or its subconsultants. This shall include, but not be limited to, the right to make site inspections at any time and with reasonable notice; to bring experts and consultants on site to examine or evaluate completed work or work in progress; to examine the books, ledgers, documents, papers, and records pertinent to this Agreement; and to observe personnel in every phase of performance of the related work.

  • High Risk Activities 1. The Software is not fault-tolerant and is not designed, manufactured or intended for use or resale as on-line control equipment in hazardous environments requiring fail-safe performance, such as in the operation of nuclear facilities, aircraft navigation or communication systems, air traffic control, direct life support machines, or weapons systems, in which the failure of the Software could lead directly to death, personal injury, or severe physical or environmental damage ("High Risk Activities"). Syncro and its suppliers specifically disclaim any express or implied warranty of fitness for High Risk Activities.

  • Extracurricular Activities Effective July 1, 2009, stipends for participation in extracurricular activities which are authorized by the appointing authority shall be: Inland $950/year Sailing $400/year Art Club Advisor $300/year Drama Club Advisor $300/year Cross Country Skiing $150/year Boys’ Basketball $1000/year Girls’ Basketball (if class D) $1000/year Asst. Boys’ Basketball $750/year Asst. Girls’ Basketball (if class D) $750/year Scorekeeper/Timekeeper $10/game Soccer $400/year Track $400/year Cross County Running $400/year Girls’ Basketball (if not class D) $400/year Sports Activity Director $400/year Athletic Director $200/year