Iterative Design Sample Clauses

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Iterative Design. As we highlighted earlier in this deliverable, Value Mapping is an iterative process, and the design needs to be continuously refined based on feedback and evaluations of stakeholders. After we retrieved all the feedback from the case study discussed above, we conducted a workshop with 42 international stakeholders ranging from policymakers, legal scholars, ethicists, farmer representative groups, AgriTech providers, farming machinery manufacturers, and so forth. For this workshop, we broke the participants into three groups, where the authors of this deliverable coordinated and led the discussion. We had posters on the walls of the room with the six stakeholders with all the relevant values mentioned earlier in the deliverable in each section. The participants were assigned to provide green or red stickers to each of the values for the stakeholders, depending on if they were positively or negatively impacted by data-sharing through data spaces for that stakeholder (see Appendix 2). We also took notes of their reasoning for such decisions and discussed when and where there may be a potential clash or conflict of values among stakeholders in the process. We noticed many similarities and overlaps with the results from the Spanish case study, but also, additional insights and feedback (see Table 9). Table 9: Workshop groups aggregated. results Farmers Human Welfare 3 3 Justice 1 1 Privacy 2 5 Accountability 3 Informed Consent 1 2 Solidarity 1 Control 8 1 Dignity 3 Trust 7 Sustainability 3 1 Autonomy 2 3 Others: Farming Advisors Human Welfare 1 Justice Privacy 1 Accountability 7 1 Informed Consent 1 Solidarity Control 1 6 Dignity Trust 7 1 Sustainability 4 1 Autonomy 1 2 Others: Farmers Associations Human Welfare 1 4 Justice 2 Privacy 3 Accountability 1 2 Informed Consent 1 Solidarity 8 Control 2 5 Dignity Trust 4 1 Sustainability 2 Autonomy 2 2 Others: Technology providers and intermediaries Human Welfare 1 4 Justice 1 1 Privacy 1 5 Accountability 4 1 Informed Consent 3 1 Solidarity 4 Control 4 6 Dignity 3 Trust 5 Sustainability 5 1 Autonomy 1 6 Others: Public and regulatory bodies Human Welfare 4 Justice 5 Privacy 1 1 Accountability 6 Informed Consent Solidarity 1 Control 4 2 Dignity Trust 9 Sustainability 6 Autonomy 2 1 Others: Society Human Welfare 1 Justice 5 Privacy 1 6 Accountability 2 1 Informed Consent 3 Solidarity 1 1 Control 4 Dignity 1 Trust 4 Sustainability 9 Autonomy 3 Others: Overall, there was a positive reaction among the participants about th...
View Source
Iterative Design. EUDAT uses an incremental and iterative approach for service development (generically known as Rapid Application Development). The iterative approach in general consists of requirements gathering, design, implementation and re-assessment of a service, as depicted in Figure 2. The user communities are actively involved during all these processes from the definition of requirements to the evaluation. This builds a sense of mutual trust, as well as developing a shared (technical) vocabulary and understanding of the relevant constraints and opportunities. This leads to the technology and service providers having a better understanding of the users’ (or stakeholders’) requirements. It ensures that EUDAT will provide services that fulfil the needs of the research communities and that will actually be used by the users from the different communities.
View Source

Related to Iterative Design

  • Schematic Design See Section 2, Part 1, Article 2.1.4, Paragraph 2.1.4.2.

  • Project Design Applicants must design a project that provides access to health services to enable eligible women and men experiencing health needs to secure and maintain safe and accessible quality screening and diagnostic services, comprehensive family planning, and/ or other women’s health services. A. Applicants are encouraged to emphasize the following components in the design of their projects. Projects must: 1. Use a collaborative approach to maximize existing community resources and avoid duplication of effort; 2. Enhance systems and local processes to make it easier for people to transition to, from, and between services; 3. Address barriers to ensure services are accessible to people regardless of setting or location; and 4. Promote improvement and positively impact health and well-being through coordinated service delivery. B. To be effective, services and activities provided or made available as part of the Proposed Project should have policies and procedures in place and include with the application as an attachment that: 1. Delineate the timely provision of services; 2. Deem Client eligibility and service provision as soon as possible and no later than 30 calendar days from initial request; 3. Require staff to assess and prioritize Client needs; 4. Implement with model fidelity to an evidence-based program or based upon best available research; 5. Plan in partnership with the person and are inclusive; 6. Provide in an environment that is most appropriate and based on a person’s preference including reasonable clinic/reception wait times that are not a barrier to care; 7. Provide referral sources for Clients that cannot be served or receive a specific service; 8. Are culturally and linguistically sensitive; 9. Tailor services to a person’s unique strengths and needs; 10. Manage funds to ensure established Clients continuity of care throughout budget year; 11. Continue to provide services to established Clients after allocated funds are expended; 12. Have processes to identify and eliminate possible barriers to care; 13. Do not deny services due to inability to pay; 14. Have appropriate key personnel and required staff to meet the medical and health needs of Clients; 15. Bill services appropriately and timely through TMHP; 16. Effectively communicate and document information related to health care needs with next steps available to Client; 17. Establish outreach and education plan for the community; and 18. Outline successful delivery of direct clinical services to Clients By submitting an Application under this RFA, the Applicant certifies that Applicant has or will have at time of grant award services, policies, or procedures that conform with the requirements in this section as applicable. HHSC, in its sole discretion, may request to review relevant documentation during the project period as necessary to ensure program fidelity.

  • Study Design This includes a discussion of the evaluation design employed including research questions and hypotheses; type of study design; impacted populations and stakeholders; data sources; and data collection; analysis techniques, including controls or adjustments for differences in comparison groups, controls for other interventions in the State and any sensitivity analyses, and limitations of the study.

  • Program Design The County Human Resources Department will operate a Catastrophic Leave Bank which is designed to assist any County employee who has exhausted all paid accruals due to a serious or catastrophic illness, injury, or condition of the employee or family member. The program establishes and maintains a Countywide bank wherein any employee who wishes to contribute may authorize that a portion of his/her accrued vacation, compensatory time, holiday compensatory time or floating holiday be deducted from those account(s) and credited to the Catastrophic Leave Bank. Employees may donate hours either to a specific eligible employee or to the bank. Upon approval, credits from the Catastrophic Leave Bank may be transferred to a requesting employee's sick leave account so that employee may remain in paid status for a longer period of time, thus partially ameliorating the financial impact of the illness, injury, or condition. Catastrophic illness or injury is defined as a critical medical condition, a long-term major physical impairment or disability which manifests itself during employment.

  • Alternative Work Schedule An alternate forty (40) hour work schedule (other than five (5) uniform and consecutive eight (8) hour days in a seven (7) day period), or for hospital personnel an eighty (80) hour workweek in a fourteen (14) day period and other mutually agreed upon schedules that comply with applicable federal and state law. Employee work schedules normally include two (2) consecutive days off.