Local Stakeholders Sample Clauses

Local Stakeholders. The XL Participants also identified groups of local stakeholders as part of the Laboratory XL process. In a decentralized, publicly accessible organization such as an academic institution, a local stakeholder process constitutes a formidable task. Efforts to involve local stakeholders at each institution have included the following. • University Faculty and Staff have been involved in the development of the Laboratory Proposal. • The Laboratory XL Proposal has been reviewed at each XL Participant by the Safety Committee (or equivalent), relevant academic or administrative bodies, Chemistry Departments, legal counsel and relevant student environmental organizations. For example, at UVM, the Environmental Council, which is comprised of faculty, administrators, researchers, alumni and students, has reviewed the XL Proposal. • University students have been informed of, or had access to, the Laboratory XL process through the campus newspaper, campus Web Site and the Laboratory XL Home Page. Students, and other interested parties, have been invited to comment on the Laboratory XL Proposal or participate in the Laboratory XL process. • Each XL Participant has identified community environmental stakeholders, including neighborhood organizations, standing committees (e.g., solid waste) for the county or city, or other local environmental organizations. Each XL Participant has publicized and hosted local meetings or spoken at local neighborhood association meetings. • Regulators with jurisdiction over laboratories have been involved in reviewing the Laboratory XL Proposal. Agencies involved include the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Burlington, (VT) Local Emergency Planning Committee, Boston, (MA) Local Emergency Planning Committee, Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Burlington (VT) Board of Health, and Boston, (MA) Fire Departments.
Local Stakeholders. The involvement of local stakeholders (institutional and not institutional) has three main objectives: ­ the sharing of poverty indicators (Delphi Metod); ­ the development of the “Observation System to monitor poverty, vulnerability and social ex­ clusion”; ­ the analysis of their information systems. With the collaboration of Health Societies and Caritas UROPS has selected 573 stakeholders using this method: ­ Extraction from the Provincial Register of third sector organisations. The regional law of so­ cial policies previews that all third sector organisations have to be registered in a Provincial Register. In our Register there are 602 organisations. ­ Selection (with the aid of the head of Provincial third sector) of the organisations that realise actions against poverty in a multidimensional concept or that have a particular point of view about living conditions of local population. Exclusion of the other organisations. ­ Sharing of the list with Health Societies and Caritas. ­ Selection of local associations or key persons (not included in Provincial Register) like self help associations, parish priests, medicals, etc.
Local Stakeholders. In all four countries the most important local stakeholders are the healthcare professionals together with the patients and their loved ones, who will be the core users of BOUNCE tool and eventually benefit from the project results. User cases and requirements should be identified and defined from the perspectives of these three stakeholder categories. For the purpose of the Bounce project, the key stakeholders are the clinics and the professionals working in the clinics participating in the project (e.g. oncologists, nurses, and psychologists). For the dissemination of the BOUNCE results, the partners in these four countries identified also other hospitals and oncology clinics together with other stakeholders regarded as supporters or contributors in the course of improving patient’s resilience. However, these non-core stakeholders and their importance vary across countries. For example, in some countries there are many cancer-related charities whereas in Finland charities are uncommon.
Local Stakeholders. The XL Participants also identified groups of local stakeholders as part of the Laboratory XL process. In a decentralized, publicly accessible organization such as an academic institution, a local stakeholder process constitutes a formidable task. Efforts to involve local stakeholders at each institution have included the following.
Local Stakeholders. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, NWAB; ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇&PF: ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇; ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇; ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Remote Solutions: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇; ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇

Related to Local Stakeholders

  • Stakeholders The following Service Provider(s) and Customer(s) will be used as the basis of the Agreement and represent the primary stakeholders associated with this SLA:

  • Copyees If Schedule 1 specifies any person to whom copies of notices shall also be sent: (a) the party giving a notice in the manner required by this Clause 18.4 shall send a copy of the notice to such person at the address for sending copies as specified in Schedule 1, or to such other person or address as may, from time to time, have been notified by the party to be notified to the notifying party under this Clause 18.4; and (b) such copy notice shall be sent immediately after the original notice.

  • Supervisors Supervisors may continue to perform bargaining unit work which is incidental to their jobs. They may also perform bargaining unit work in emergency situations and where such work is necessary to train a covered member. Such work by supervisors may result from but shall not cause any layoffs of covered members.

  • ARTISTES AND SPORTSPERSONS 1. Notwithstanding the provisions of Articles 7 and 14, income derived by a resident of a Contracting State as an entertainer, such as a theatre, motion picture, radio or television artiste, or a musician, or as a sportsperson, from his personal activities as such exercised in the other Contracting State, may be taxed in that other State. 2. Where income in respect of personal activities exercised by an entertainer or a sportsperson in his capacity as such accrues not to the entertainer or sportsperson himself but to another person, that income may, notwithstanding the provisions of Articles 7 and 14, be taxed in the Contracting State in which the activities of the entertainer or sportsperson are exercised.

  • Vendors Any vendors engaged by Tenant to perform services in or to the Premises including, without limitation, janitorial contractors and moving contractors shall be coordinated with any work being performed by or for Landlord and in such manner as to maintain harmonious labor relations and not to damage the Building or the Property or interfere with Building construction or operation and shall be performed by vendors first approved by Landlord.