Mediator Selection Sample Clauses

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Mediator Selection. Unless the parties agree otherwise, the parties will select the mediator(s) from the roster of attorney mediators trained under the Alternative Dispute Resolution Program of the Coconino County Superior Court. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator within ten (10) business days of the confirmation of receipt of Mediation Notice, each party will independently inform the Director of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Program of the Coconino County Superior Court (the “Director”) of three attorney mediators from that roster that are acceptable to the party, and further, inform the Director of any preference as to matters such as whether co-mediation is preferable, mediation style, subject matter expertise, or other factors pertinent to the case. The Director will then select one or more attorney mediators from the parties’ lists or such other attorney mediator(s) from the above noted roster as the Director may deem, in the Director’s sole discretion, appropriate under the circumstances.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Mediator Selection. The Authorized Individuals will have five business days from the date they cease direct negotiations to submit to each other a written list of acceptable qualified attorney-mediators not affiliated with any Member. Within five days from the date the list is received, the Authorized Individuals will rank the mediators in numerical order of preference and exchange the rankings. If one or more names are on both lists, the highest-ranking person will be designated as the mediator. If no mediator has been selected under this procedure, the Disputing Members agree jointly to request a State or Federal District Judge of their choosing to supply within ten business days a list of potential qualified attorney-mediators. If they cannot agree upon a State or Federal Judge, the Local Administrative Judge for the county in which the Partnership’s principal office is located may supply the list. Within five business days from the date the list is received, the Authorized Individuals will again rank the proposed mediators in numerical order of preference and will simultaneously exchange the list and will select as the mediator the individual receiving the highest combined ranking. If the mediator is not available to serve, they will proceed to contact the mediator who was next highest in ranking until they are able to select a mediator.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Mediator Selection. Subject to the provisions relating to mediators in Section 8.1, a mediator will be selected by the participants not later than one hundred eighty (180) days after the opening of the New Restaurant from a panel of three (3) candidates selected by the Dispute Resolution Entity from the region where the Target Site is located. If the participants cannot agree on the selection of a mediator from such panel, then the Dispute Resolution Entity will select a mediator from its other panel members (but not from such panel of three candidates) residing in the region where the Target Site is located.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Mediator Selection. In States without a USDA Certified State Mediation Program, the participant may request that a qualified mediator be added to the current NRCS list. If the mediator meets the requirements established by 7 CFR Section 614.2, the State Conservationist may add the mediator to the list.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Mediator Selection. 29 Section 18.5 Mediation Time and Place...............................................29 Section 18.6
View Source
Mediator Selection a. The employee will initially select which group (source) of mediators to be used in mediation, i.e., either the Shared Neutrals Program (SNP) or the Contracted Service Provider (CSP). Accordingly, the ADR Program Manager (PM) will provide the employee with the names and biographical information of at least three (3) lead mediators and two (2) co-mediators from the SNP; or five (5) mediators from at least three (3) CSP’s as per the employee’s source of mediator selection. The ADR PM will indicate her/his first choice for the employee’s consideration. b. The employee will be given up to six (6) workdays from the date he/she receives the mediators’ names and biographical information to either: select the mediator from the list of mediators from the CSP, or select the mediator and co-mediator from the list of mediators and co-mediators from the SNP. The employee may delegate selection of the mediator(s) to her/his GESTA representative. c. If the mediator selected is not reasonably available, then the employee may select another mediator(s) from the list provided, or the employee may request and will be provided with a new list of mediators as per the procedure above, and a new mediator selection will be made within four (4) workdays. In the interest of expediting the process, the employee is encouraged to pick both a 1st and 2nd choice for mediator during the initial six (6) workday review. The employee will not be required to reveal his/her 2nd choice unless the 1st choice mediator is not reasonably available. d. The selection of a mediator for the Informal EO Complaint Process will be made by the ADR Program Manager from the source elected by the complainant (i.e., SNP or CSP).
View Source
Mediator Selection. The Authorized Individuals will have five (5) business days from the date they cease direct negotiations to submit to each other a written list of acceptable certified attorney‑mediators who do not have any professional, business, or familial relationship with any Member. Within five (5) days from the date the list is received, the Authorized Individuals will rank the mediators in numerical order of preference and exchange the rankings. If one or more names are on both lists, the highest ranking person will be designated as the mediator. If no mediator has been selected under this procedure, the Disputing Members agree jointly to request the Clerk of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Indiana, or the Clerk of a Circuit Court of another Indiana county of their choosing, to supply a list of potential certified attorney‑mediators. Within five (5) business days from the date the list is received, the Authorized Individuals will again rank the proposed mediators in numerical order of preference and will simultaneously exchange the list and will select as the mediator the individual receiving the highest combined ranking. If the mediator is not available to serve, they will proceed to contact the mediator who was next highest in ranking until they are able to select a mediator. “Certified” means a mediator who has been certified pursuant to Indiana's Rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution.
View Source
Mediator Selection. The Parties must mediate the dispute using a mutually accepted mediator whom the Parties must choose within ten days after that demand. No Party is entitled unreasonably to withhold consent to any mediator’s selection.
View Source
Mediator Selection. Unless the Members agree otherwise, the Members will select the one or more mutually acceptable trained mediator(s) within fourteen 14 days of the confirmation of receipt of Mediation Notice.
View Source

Related to Mediator Selection

  • Arbitrator Selection The arbitrator will be appointed by the Administrator in accordance with the rules of the Administrator. However, unless the parties agree otherwise, the arbitrator must be a retired or former judge or a lawyer with at least ten (10) years of experience.

  • Contractor Selection In this section, please describe the selection process, including other sources considered and the rationale for selecting the contractor. Please answer all questions: a. What specific skill set does this contractor bring to the project? Please attach a copy of the contractor’s resume if an individual or link to contractor website if a company: Little to Great Scientists is an international leader in early childhood, elementary, middle and high school science education. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/ b. How was the Contractor selected? Quotes, RFP/RFQ, Sealed Bid or Sole Source designation from the City of New Haven Purchasing Department? This contractor was selected because of their continued commitment to NHPS. They possess the knowledge base, resources, and motivation to support hands-on science education in New Haven. No other contractors were considered for this partnership. c. Is the contractor the lowest bidder? N/A If no, why? Why was this contractor selected? This contractor was selected because of their unique expertise in hands-on science learning and their continued commitment to New Haven Public Schools. They possess the knowledge and resources to support science learning at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ School. d. Who were the members of the selection committee that scored bid applications? N/A e. If the contractor is Sole Source, please attach a copy of the Sole Source designation letter from the City of New Haven Purchasing Department. N/A

  • Mediator 15.4.1 If the parties cannot resolve the Dispute under clause 15.3 within that period, they must refer the Dispute to a mediator. 15.4.2 If, within a further twenty (20) Business Days, the parties to the Dispute do not agree on a mediator, a party to the Dispute may ask the chairman of the Resolving Body to appoint a mediator. 15.4.3 The mediator assists in negotiating a resolution of the Dispute. A mediator may not bind a party unless the party agrees in writing. 15.4.4 The mediation ends if the Dispute is not resolved within twenty

  • Selection of Mediator A single mediator that is acceptable to both parties shall be used to mediate the dispute. The mediator will be knowledgeable in the subject matter of this Contract, if possible.

  • Panel Selection 1. The Parties shall apply the following procedures in selecting a Panel: (a) the Panel shall comprise 3 members; (b) within 15 days following the date of the establishment of the Panel, each Party shall nominate a Panelist; (c) the Parties shall endeavor 2. If a Panelist appointed under this Article resigns or becomes unable to act, a successor Panelist shall be appointed within 30 days in accordance with the selection procedure as prescribed for the appointment of the original Panelist and the successor shall have all the powers and duties of the original Panelist. The work of the Panel shall be suspended during the appointment of the successor Panelist.