PAR Process Sample Clauses

PAR Process. APS and ATF will present jointly to principals at a designated time at the beginning of each school year. The presentation will include, but not be limited to:
PAR Process. 1. APS and ATF will present jointly to principals at a designated time at the beginning of each school year. The presentation will include, but not be limited to: a. An overview of the PAR Program. b. Data about the program c. The process for placing teachers on a District Improvement or an Intensive Evaluation Plan including the Principal’s responsibilities in the PAR process prior to placing an employee on an Improvement Plan as follows: 1.) Principal notes the concern(s) in the teacher’s performance to discern if there is a pattern. Concerns regarding the teacher’s performance may come about as a result of classroom observations or other evidence of teaching problems. 2.) Principal confirms the pattern with evidence from observations. 3.) Principal converses with teacher to notify him/her of the concern(s). a.) The principal addresses the specific concern(s) with the teacher verbally and/or in writing if already addressed verbally. b.) The principal advises the teacher that communication about the concern(s) will continue and a follow-up is scheduled in a specified time frame. c.) The principal provides assistance to the teacher. d.) If there is insufficient improvement, the principal and the teacher will meet to review the documentation (meetings, memos, concerns, observations, etc.). Then, a meeting with the teacher, principal, a representative from the Albuquerque Teachers Federation, and a Human Resources Representative is scheduled. e.) The concerns, evidence, expectations, support, improvement plan and a target date for improvement will be reviewed at this meeting. f.) Once the teacher is placed on an improvement or intensive evaluation plan, a Consulting Teacher will be assigned if there is space available in the PAR Program. 2. Implementation of Employee Improvement or Intensive Evaluation plan a. Support provided by the Consulting Teacher through the PAR Program is not optional for employees on District Improvement or Intensive Evaluation Plans. b. The principal will continue to make regular classroom observations and provide summary memorandums (feedback) as to what has been observed. The memos may include suggestions and reminders if the teacher is or isn’t making expected progress. Walk-through visits are not evaluative and thus are not part of the regular classroom observations noted above. c. Prior to meeting with the teacher, the Improvement or Intensive Evaluation Plan will be drafted. Specific concerns will be identified in the plan. d....
PAR Process a. APS and ATF will present jointly to principals at a designated time at the beginning of each school year. The presentation will include, but not be limited to: 1.) Putting teachers on an Improvement Plan 2.) The PAR Program b. Principal’s responsibilities in the PAR process prior to placing an employee on an Improvement Plan are as follows: 1.) Principal notes the concern(s) in the teacher’s performance to discern if there is a pattern. Concerns regarding any of the nine teacher competencies may come about as a result of classroom observations or other evidence of teaching problems. 2.) Principal confirms the pattern with evidence from observations. 3.) Principal converses with teacher to notify him/her of the concern(s). a.) The principal addresses the specific competencies of concern with the teacher verbally and/or in writing if already addressed verbally. b.) The principal advises the teacher that communication about the competencies will continue and a follow-up is scheduled in a specified time frame. c.) The principal provides assistance to the teacher. 4.) If there is no improvement, then the principal will meet with Human Resources to review the documentation (meetings, memos, concerns, observations, etc.) and a meeting with the teacher, principal, a representative from the Albuquerque Teachers Federation, and a Human Resources Representative will be scheduled. a.) The concerns, evidence, expectations, support and a target date for improvement will be reviewed at this meeting. b.) Once the teachers is placed on an improvement plan, if there is space available in the PAR Program, a Consulting Teacher will be assigned.
PAR Process. 1. APS and ATF will present jointly to principals at a designated time at the beginning of each school year. The presentation will include, but not be limited to: a. An overview of the PAR Program. b. Data about the program. c. The process for placing teachers on a District Improvement or an Intensive Evaluation Plan including the Evaluator’s responsibilities in the PAR process prior to placing an employee on an Improvement Plan are as follows: 1.) Evaluator identifies a pattern of concern(s) in the teacher’s performance. Concerns regarding the teacher’s performance may come about as a result of formal observations, walkthroughs, drop –ins, or other evidence of teaching problems. 2.) Evaluator confirms the pattern with evidence from a formal observation. 3.) Evaluator converses with teacher to notify them of the concern(s). a.) The evaluator addresses the specific concern(s) with the teacher verbally or in writing if already addressed verbally. b.) The evaluator advises the teacher that communication about the concern(s) will continue and a follow-up discussion is scheduled in a specified time frame. c.) The evaluator provides targeted assistance to the teacher and documents the assistance provided. d.) If there is insufficient improvement, the evaluator, and the teacher will meet to review the documentation (meetings, memos, concerns, observations, etc.). If appropriate, the evaluator will inform the teacher that a District Improvement Plan will be written. Then, a meeting with the teacher, evaluator, a representative from the Albuquerque Teachers Federation, and a Department of Human Resources Representative is scheduled. e.) The concerns, evidence, expectations, support, improvement plan, and a target date for improvement will be reviewed at this meeting. f.) Once the teacher is placed on an improvement or intensive evaluation plan, a Consulting Teacher will be assigned if there is space available in the PAR Program.
PAR Process a. APS and ATF will present jointly to principals at a designated time at the beginning of each school year. The presentation will include, but not be limited to: 1.) An overview of the PAR Program. 2.) Data about the program. 3.) The process for placing teachers on a District Improvement or an Intensive Evaluation Plan including the Evaluator’s responsibilities in the PAR process prior to placing an employee on an Improvement Plan are is as follows. Prior to placing a teacher on a district plan, the evaluator’s responsibilities are: a.) Evaluator identifies a pattern of concern(s) in the teacher’s performance. Concerns regarding the teacher’s performance may come about as a result because of formal observations, walkthroughs, drop –ins, or other evidence of teaching problems. b.) Evaluator confirms the pattern with evidence from a formal observation. c.) Evaluator converses with teacher to notify them of the concern(s).

Related to PAR Process

  • Order Process When the start of production of your reservation nears, we will ask you to confirm your option selections and to provide full details of the legal purchaser of the Model X. Tesla will create an order for your Model X containing the information provided by you, and a Purchase Agreement indicating the estimated purchase price of your Model X, taking into account the base price of the model and any options included or that you select, plus estimates of any applicable taxes, duties, transport and delivery charges, and any other applicable fees. Tesla will then submit to you the order and the Purchase Agreement for your review. If you wish to proceed and purchase the Model X, you must sign and return the Purchase Agreement together with any amounts that are then required to be paid. Production of your Model X will then be commenced and your deposit payable under the Purchase Agreement will be held by Tesla as a non-refundable deposit (to the extent permitted by applicable law). At the time you enter into the Purchase Agreement, you may, at your sole option, notify us that you would like to take your Reservation Payment and apply it to your deposit. These procedures may be subject to change.

  • Change Order Process 12.2.1 Contractor shall provide Notice to Owner as soon as practicable, but no later than five (5) Business Days, after the time when Contractor knows of the impact of any Force Majeure Event, Owner Caused Delay or any other basis for a Change Order that will impact the Work. Failure to provide such Notice within ten (10) Business Days after the time when Contractor knows of the impact of any Force Majeure Event shall be deemed to be a waiver of the Contractor’s right to receive a Change Order with respect thereto. Such Notice shall, to the extent practicable, specify the estimated impact on the Target Price and/or the Project Schedule, as applicable, the impact upon the various portions of the Work occasioned by reason of such Force Majeure Event, Owner Caused Delay or any other basis for a Change Order, and shall substantiate the foregoing to the satisfaction of Owner. In the event that Contractor does not know or is unable to specify with reasonable certainty the impact upon the Work at the time such Notice is to be delivered, Contractor shall instead provide Owner with a notice of a potential or anticipated impact of any Force Majeure Event, Owner Caused Delay or any other basis for a Change Order that could impact the Work, and shall thereafter provide Owner (and, if requested by Owner, the Independent Engineer) with periodic supplemental Notices during the period that the Force Majeure Event, Owner Caused Delay or any other basis for a Change Order, as applicable, continues, detailing any developments, progress or other relevant information of which Contractor is aware. To the extent Owner (in consultation with the Independent Engineer with respect to a Material Change) agrees with the Contractor’s determination of a Force Majeure Event or Owner Caused Delay or any other basis for a Change Order, as applicable, and the effects thereof, Owner shall notify Contractor of Owner’s acceptance. In the event Owner (in consultation with the Independent Engineer with respect to a Material Change) does not accept the Contractor’s findings, Owner or Contractor shall be permitted to dispute such Change Order in accordance with Article 36, and Contractor shall be paid for any Work performed in respect of such disputed Change Order as provided in Section 12.2.5. 12.2.2 As soon as practicable, and in any event within fifteen (15) Days (or such other period as is mutually agreed by Owner and Contractor) after receipt from Owner of a request for a change or Notice of Owner’s acceptance under Section 12.2.1, Contractor shall submit to Owner a proposal for implementing the change indicating the estimated change to the Target Price and/or the Project Schedule, as applicable. If Owner (having consulted with the Independent Engineer in the case of a Material Change) agrees that the Contractor’s proposal should be implemented, Owner (having consulted with the Independent Engineer in the case of a Material Change) shall issue a Change Order incorporating such proposal. Upon receiving such Change Order, Contractor shall diligently perform the change in accordance with the terms thereof. 12.2.3 Contractor’s proposal required pursuant to Section 12.2.2 shall consist of: (a) a detailed material take-off with supporting calculations in accordance with the pricing structure herein, for pricing the change, (b) revisions, if any, to the Drawings and Specifications, (c) a schedule for the work associated with the proposed change, (d) the effect, if any, to the Target Price and/or the Project Schedule, as applicable, (e) the effect, if any, of the change on the Work, including the Performance Tests and/or Demonstration Tests (or protocol therefor), (f) changes, if any, to any right, liability or obligation of a Party or any other provision hereof and (g) changes, if applicable, to any Applicable Deadline.

  • Governing Law; Service of Process (a) THIS AGREEMENT AND EACH OTHER CREDIT DOCUMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. (b) THE BORROWERS, HOLDINGS, THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND EACH LENDER EACH IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY SUBMITS, FOR ITSELF AND ITS PROPERTY, TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK SITTING IN NEW YORK CITY IN THE BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN AND OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, AND ANY APPELLATE COURT FROM ANY THEREOF, IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY OTHER CREDIT DOCUMENT, OR FOR RECOGNITION OR ENFORCEMENT OF ANY JUDGMENT, AND EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY AGREES THAT ALL CLAIMS IN RESPECT OF ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING MAY BE HEARD AND DETERMINED IN SUCH NEW YORK STATE COURT OR, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN SUCH FEDERAL COURT. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY LAW. EACH PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT THE AGENTS AND LENDERS RETAIN THE RIGHT TO SERVE PROCESS IN ANY OTHER MANNER PERMITTED BY LAW OR TO BRING PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ANY LOAN PARTY IN THE COURTS OF ANY OTHER JURISDICTION IN CONNECTION WITH THE EXERCISE OF ANY RIGHTS UNDER ANY COLLATERAL DOCUMENT OR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ANY JUDGMENT. EACH OF THE SWISS SUBSIDIARY BORROWER AND THE JAPANESE SUBSIDIARY BORROWER HEREBY WAIVES PERSONAL SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS, COMPLAINT AND OTHER PROCESS ISSUED IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR SUIT AND AGREES THAT SERVICE OF SUCH SUMMONS, COMPLAINTS AND OTHER PROCESS MAY BE MADE ON THE PARENT BORROWER AT ITS ADDRESS SET FORTH IN SCHEDULE 10.02 OF THIS AGREEMENT AS ITS APPOINTED AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS. (c) THE BORROWERS, HOLDINGS, THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND EACH LENDER EACH IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY OBJECTION THAT IT MAY NOW OR HEREAFTER HAVE TO THE LAYING OF VENUE OF ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY OTHER CREDIT DOCUMENT IN ANY COURT REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH (b) OF THIS SECTION. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, THE DEFENSE OF AN INCONVENIENT FORUM TO THE MAINTENANCE OF SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN ANY SUCH COURT.

  • Consent to Service of Process (a) The Bank hereby appoints the Fiscal Agent under the Fiscal Agency Agreement as its authorized agent (the “Authorized Agent”) upon whom process may be served in any action arising out of or based upon this Agreement which may be instituted in any State or Federal court in New York City by any Underwriter and expressly accepts the jurisdiction of any such court in respect of such action. Such appointment shall be irrevocable so long as any of the Securities remain outstanding unless and until the appointment of a successor Fiscal Agent as the Bank’s Authorized Agent and such successor Fiscal Agent’s acceptance of such appointment. The Bank will take any and all action, including the filing of any and all documents and instruments, that may be necessary to continue such appointment or appointments in full force and effect as aforesaid. Service of process upon the Authorized Agent and written notice of such service to the Bank (mailed or delivered to the President at the seat of the Bank) shall be deemed, in every respect, effective service of process upon the Bank. (b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, any action arising out of or based upon this Agreement may be instituted by any Underwriter in any competent court of the jurisdiction in which the Bank has its seat. (c) The Bank hereby waives irrevocably (to the extent permitted by law) any immunity from jurisdiction or execution to which it or its property might otherwise be entitled in any action arising out of or based upon this Agreement which may be instituted by any Underwriter in any State or Federal court in New York City or in any competent court of the jurisdiction in which the Bank has its seat. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the property and assets of the Bank within the Member States are not subject to attachment or to seizure by way of execution without the authorization of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Please confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth the agreement between the Bank and the several Underwriters. Very truly yours, EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK By: /s/ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ By: /s/ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ We hereby confirm as of the date hereof that such letter correctly sets forth the agreement between the Bank and the several Underwriters.

  • Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Service of Process (a) THIS AGREEMENT AND EACH OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY PROVIDED THEREIN). (b) EXCEPT AS SET FORTH IN THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH, ANY LEGAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING UNDER ANY LOAN DOCUMENT OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH OR RELATED OR INCIDENTAL TO THE DEALINGS OF THE PARTIES HERETO OR ANY OF THEM WITH RESPECT TO ANY LOAN DOCUMENT, OR THE TRANSACTIONS RELATED THERETO, IN EACH CASE WHETHER NOW EXISTING OR HEREAFTER ARISING, SHALL BE BROUGHT IN ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ SITTING IN NEW YORK CITY OR OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF SUCH STATE (PROVIDED THAT IF NONE OF SUCH COURTS CAN AND WILL EXERCISE SUCH JURISDICTION, SUCH EXCLUSIVITY SHALL NOT APPLY), AND BY EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE PARENT BORROWER, HOLDINGS, EACH AGENT AND EACH LENDER CONSENTS, FOR ITSELF AND IN RESPECT OF ITS PROPERTY, TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THOSE COURTS. THE PARENT BORROWER, HOLDINGS, THE SUBSIDIARY BORROWER, EACH AGENT AND EACH LENDER IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, INCLUDING ANY OBJECTION TO THE LAYING OF VENUE OR BASED ON THE GROUNDS OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS, WHICH IT MAY NOW OR HEREAFTER HAVE TO THE BRINGING OF ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN SUCH JURISDICTION IN RESPECT OF ANY LOAN DOCUMENT OR OTHER DOCUMENT RELATED THERETO. (c) THE PARENT BORROWER HEREBY APPOINTS BURGER KING CORPORATION, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ AS ITS AUTHORIZED AGENT (THE “AUTHORIZED AGENT”) UPON WHOM PROCESS MAY BE SERVED IN ANY SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR BASED UPON THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREIN WHICH MAY BE INSTITUTED IN ANY STATE OR FEDERAL COURT IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK. SERVICE OF PROCESS UPON THE AUTHORIZED AGENT SHALL BE DEEMED, IN EVERY RESPECT, EFFECTIVE SERVICE OF PROCESS UPON THE PARENT BORROWER. NOTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT OR IN ANY OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT SHALL AFFECT ANY RIGHT THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, THE COLLATERAL AGENT OR ANY LENDER MAY OTHERWISE HAVE TO BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT AGAINST ANY LOAN PARTY OR ITS PROPERTIES IN THE COURTS OF ANY JURISDICTION (I) FOR PURPOSES OF ENFORCING A JUDGMENT, (II) IN CONNECTION WITH EXERCISING REMEDIES AGAINST THE COLLATERAL IN A JURISDICTION IN WHICH SUCH COLLATERAL IS LOCATED, (III) IN CONNECTION WITH ANY PENDING BANKRUPTCY, INSOLVENCY OR SIMILAR PROCEEDING IN SUCH JURISDICTION OR (IV) TO THE EXTENT THE COURTS REFERRED TO IN THE PREVIOUS PARAGRAPH DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER SUCH LEGAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING OR THE PARTIES OR PROPERTY SUBJECT THERETO.