Peer Input Sample Clauses

Peer Input. The Patient Care Manager will seek peer input in 15 preparing each RN's evaluation. During the evaluation process, the Manager may 16 provide the RN a summary of peer comments regarding his/her performance, which 17 may become part of the evaluation documents. A copy of the summary of peer 18 comments will be providedavailable to the RN on request. Peers participating in the 19 peer review process will complete their evaluations within the time lines arranged by the 20 Patient Care Manager, which shall be established in advance with reasonable regard for 21 the additional work required.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Peer Input. The Nurse Manager may seek peer input in preparing each RN's 11 evaluation. The nurse may also select an equal number of peers for their evaluation.
View Source
Peer Input. The NursePatient Care Manager maywill seek peer input in 12 preparing each RN's evaluation. The nurse may also select an equal number of peers 13 for their evaluation. During the evaluation process, the Nurse Manager may provide the 14 RN a summary of peer comments regarding his/her performance, which may become 15 part of the evaluation documents. A copy of the summary of peer comments will be 16 provided to the RN. Peers participating in the peer review process will complete their 17 evaluations within the time lines arranged by the NursePatient Care Manager, which 18 shall be established in advance with reasonable regard for the additional work required.
View Source
Peer Input. The bargaining unit member and the immediate supervisor or designee may agree to a process whereby a peer is mutually selected by the bargaining unit member and the immediate supervisor or designee to provide input regarding the bargaining unit member’s evaluation.
View Source
Peer Input. 2.4.1 Faculty members work closely with peers, especially those in their department or division. Evaluation of the faculty member's respect for colleagues and the teaching profession must be obtained during contract faculty evaluations. 2.4.2 Anonymous peer-review input about an identified evaluee shall not be utilized as the sole basis for District disciplinary action or formal performance improvement directives. 2.4.3 The PARTIES agree to work collaboratively via a work group to identify a new evaluation mechanism that will ensure anonymity, only survey completion by an AVC faculty member, and prevent duplication. The group will start meeting in February 2025. The group will provide an update regarding findings, recommendations, and suggestions. 8. For the Fall 2024 semester, the fully signed final report and all accompanying documentation with all required signatures (i.e., observation reports, self-evaluation, ▇▇▇▇'▇ report, student and peer survey results) shall be due to the Tenure Coordinator by December 7, 2024; however, faculty and administrators who are chairing more than two committees may contact the Tenure Coordinator to arrange for an alternative, no later than December 31, 2024, if this date is not feasible. 9. Unintended Consequences: Should an unforeseen issue arise, the AVCFT and the Vice President Academic Affairs will consult and come to a mutual agreement to resolve the issue.
View Source
Peer Input. The Patient Care Manager will seek peer input in preparing each
View Source
Peer Input. The Patient Care Manager will seek peer input in preparing each RN's evaluation. During the evaluation process, the Manager may provide the RN a summary of peer comments regarding his/her performance, which may become part of the evaluation documents. A copy of the summary of peer comments will be provided to the RN. Peers participating in the peer review process will complete their evaluations within the time lines arranged by the Patient Care Manager, which shall be established in advance with reasonable regard for the additional work required.
View Source
Peer Input. Faculty members work closely with peers, especially those in their department or division. Evaluation of the faculty member's respect for colleagues and the teaching profession must be obtained during probationary faculty evaluations and may be required during evaluations of tenured and adjunct faculty.
View Source

Related to Peer Input

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Program Objectives Implement a rigorous constructability program following The University of Texas System, Office of Capital Projects Constructability Manual. Identify and document Project cost and schedule savings (targeted costs are 5% of construction costs). Clarification of Project goals, objectives.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.