Performance Evaluation Appeal Procedure Sample Clauses

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 2 times
Performance Evaluation Appeal Procedure. Step 1. If an employee receives a needs improvement or unsatisfactory evaluation and such employee disagrees with such evaluation, the employee will meet with their immediate supervisor and/or division head within five (5) calendar days after receipt by the employee of the performance evaluation report and will be given an answer within five (5) calendar days after said meeting. When the immediate supervisor and division head are the same person, this step will be omitted. Step 2. If an employee received a needs improvement or unsatisfactory evaluation and the division head and the immediate supervisor are the same person or if there is no satisfactory resolution at Step 1, then the employee within five (5) calendar days after either receipt by the employee of the performance evaluation report or the answer in Step 1, as the case may be, will so advise the University Librarian or designee who will review the performance evaluation report with the employee's immediate supervisor and division head and then with the employee and will give the employee an answer within five (5) calendar days after said review with the employee. Step 3. If the matter is not resolved at Step 2, the employee within five (5) calendar days after the answer in Step 2 will so advise the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. The ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ will review the performance evaluation report with the University Librarian or designee and then with the employee and will give the employee an answer within five (5) calendar days after said review with the employee. The determination of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall be the final step in the performance evaluation review procedure. The performance evaluation shall not be subject to the grievance and arbitration procedure of this Agreement.
Performance Evaluation Appeal Procedure. In disputes concerning instances where an employee has received a less than acceptable evaluation, the following appeal procedures shall apply.
Performance Evaluation Appeal Procedure. Since probationary employees are “at will” until successfully completing their probationary period, only permanent (non-probationary) employees may appeal their performance evaluation. However, a probationary employee may attach a response to his/her performance evaluation, with the response to be filed in his/her personnel file.
Performance Evaluation Appeal Procedure. Permanent, non-probationary employees may appeal their performance evaluation. A probationary employee may attach a response to his/her performance evaluation, with the response to be filed in his/her personnel file.
Performance Evaluation Appeal Procedure. In disputes concerning instances where an employee has received a less than acceptable evaluation, the following appeal procedures shall apply. Within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the final evaluation, the employee must appeal in writing setting forth the reasons the employee disagrees with the evaluation. The appeal shall be submitted to the Executive Director. Within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt, the Executive Director may meet with the employee and an employee representative. The Executive Director shall respond in writing, modifying the evaluation and/or setting forth their reason not to modify the evaluation. The Executive Director’s decision is final. If the evaluation is modified to the employee’s satisfaction, only the modified evaluation shall be placed in the employee’s personnel file. If the evaluation is not modified to the employee’s satisfaction, the employee may submit their comments to be included in their personnel file.
Performance Evaluation Appeal Procedure. An appeal may be made for a performance evaluation where the rating average falls below a score of satisfactory. Such appeal shall be submitted in writing to the Department Director within five (5) working days after the final appraisal interview is conducted. The appeal shall include the areas of disagreement and the employee’s justification for seeking the appeal. When an employee appeals a performance evaluation resulting in no modification at the department level, the employee may file for a review of the evaluation with the Human Resources Director. Performance evaluations are not subject to Article 28 Grievance and Arbitration Procedures.

Related to Performance Evaluation Appeal Procedure

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Performance Evaluations Employee performance shall be evaluated and communicated on a yearly basis as required under County policy. Performance evaluations are used to demonstrate to employees that they are valued; record how an employee’s performance meet the requirements of the job; create a job history record; identify employee strengths and areas for enhancement; assist the employee and supervisor in an effort to attain the highest level of performance; and reinforce performance standards. Every effort will be made to include substantiated information within an employee’s performance evaluation. Non-recurring discipline history which is more than two (2) years old will not be referenced in performance evaluations. The County shall ensure employee performance evaluations are conducted in accordance with County and departmental policy. Performance evaluations and disciplinary matters shall only be conducted by County employees. When an employee who does not agree with the overall rating he/she receives on his/her written performance evaluation, he/she shall discuss and attempt to resolve the differences with his/her immediate supervisor. If discussion with his/her immediate supervisor does not result in resolution of the differences, the employee may file a written request to meet with the next level of management. Said request shall state the unresolved issues and the specific changes in the written performance evaluation the employee is seeking. The appropriate manager shall meet with the employee to discuss the unresolved issues. If the issues are not resolved to the employee’s satisfaction following discussion with the appropriate manager, the employee may within thirty (30) working days file a written request for a meeting with the department head. Within fourteen (14) working days of receipt of a written request stating the unresolved issues and the desired changes in the written performance evaluation, the department head shall meet with the employee to discuss the issues. Within ten (10) working days of said meeting, the department head shall respond in writing to the employee. The decision of the Department Head shall be final and not subject to the grievance procedure. An employee may submit a written response to his/her evaluation that shall be placed in his/her personnel file.

  • Evaluation Procedure 6.1.1 The established evaluation form is to be prepared by the immediate supervisor under whom the bargaining unit member has served for sixty (60) working days or more. (See evaluation form attached as Appendix B.) The immediate supervisor is to present a draft of an evaluation report to the bargaining unit member in private and discuss the report with the bargaining unit member being evaluated. The evaluation shall be based upon direct observation by the immediate supervisor or verified facts. Evaluation reports reflecting “Needs Improvement” or “Does not meet standards” ratings shall include statements of deficiencies and recommendations for improvements, in writing, by the evaluator. The signature by the bargaining unit member does not indicate the employee’s agreement with the ratings; it indicates that the employee has received a copy. 6.1.1.1 Permanent employees shall be evaluated annually. 6.1.1.2 Probationary employees shall be evaluated at least once during the probationary period, prior to the end of the fourth month. 6.1.2 Evaluation reports reflecting “Needs Improvement” or “Does Not Meet Standards” ratings shall be placed in the bargaining unit member’s personnel file only after written notification by the supervisor that the bargaining unit member has been given an opportunity to prepare a written response to such evaluation. Prior to evaluation reports reflecting any “Needs Improvement” or “Does Not Meet Standards” ratings the evaluator is encouraged to implement a Performance Improvement Plan. (See Performance Improvement Plan form attached as Appendix C.) 6.1.3 A bargaining unit member has the right to attach a response to the employee’s evaluation provided that such written response is submitted to the employee's supervisor within fifteen (15) days of the employee's receipt of the evaluation. Any timely received response shall be attached to, and become a permanent part of, the employee's evaluation. 6.1.4 Evaluatees may, within ten (10) working days, present the employee’s objections to the evaluation decision to the Director Personnel Services. Grounds for the objections shall be based on one or more of the following: (1) the evaluation was not based on fact; (2) the evaluation was based on discriminatory standards; (3) the evaluation was not conducted in conformance with this Article. Within ten (10) working days of receipt of such objection the Director Personnel Services shall hear the objections and render a decision whether to uphold the evaluation or rescind the evaluation. 6.1.5 The bargaining unit member's supervisor may, at any time, prepare a notice of commendation. The completed form is to be signed by the bargaining unit member to indicate receipt and the bargaining unit member shall be given a signed copy. The original notice is to be forwarded to the Personnel Services Office for filing. 6.1.6 Contents of evaluations are not subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement, Article VII, but procedural violations are subject to the grievance procedure. 6.1.7 The probation period shall be defined as the initial six (6) month employment period. 6.1.8 In the event a permanent bargaining unit member is hired for a new position, and is subsequently released from probation under section 6.1.7, the employee will be returned to the employee’s previous classification. 6.1.9 The District, CSEA and the bargaining unit member may mutually agree to extend the probationary period of a bargaining unit member on an individual basis provided the extension is no longer than four (4) months.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.