Performance Evaluation Criteria Clause Samples

The Performance Evaluation Criteria clause defines the standards and metrics by which a party’s performance under the contract will be measured. Typically, this clause outlines specific benchmarks, deliverables, timelines, or quality requirements that must be met, and may include methods for monitoring and reporting progress. By clearly establishing how performance will be assessed, this clause helps ensure accountability and provides a basis for addressing underperformance or disputes related to contract fulfillment.
Performance Evaluation Criteria. The Government will evaluate Contractor’s performance by assessing the key project deliverables described in the Performance Requirements Summary (Attachment 1).
View SourceView Similar (4)
Performance Evaluation Criteria. 14.4.1 In collaboration with the Executive Committee of each Faculty or School Council, or a committee of Librarians elected by a majority ballot of the Librarians, the ▇▇▇▇ will prepare in writing the criteria for the evaluation of performance. Criteria, and any subsequent changes, will be approved by a vote of Faculty or School Council. Criteria in the University Library will be approved by a vote of the Librarians. 14.4.2 For units that do not have a Council, such as Student Affairs, a committee consisting of the ▇▇▇▇ and three (3) Members will develop the criteria for evaluation. Criteria, and any subsequent changes, will be approved by a vote of the Members within their unit. 14.4.3 For the Faculty Development Coordinator, criteria will be developed by three (3) Tenured Members selected from three (3) Faculty or School Executive Committees, the Faculty Development Coordinator, and the Faculty Development Coordinator’s ▇▇▇▇. 14.4.4 Each year, the ▇▇▇▇ will provide all Members with a copy of the current performance evaluation criteria.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Performance Evaluation Criteria. 14.4.1 In conjunction with the ▇▇▇▇, the Faculty or School Executive Committee will prepare in writing the criteria for the assessment of performance relating to completion of assigned workload. Criteria for the assessment of performance, including any subsequent modifications, are subject to review by the respective Faculty or School Council. 14.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ will provide all Members with a copy of the current appropriate performance evaluation criteria for their respective Faculty, School or professional Academic Unit prior to the commencement of the year under review.
View Source

Related to Performance Evaluation Criteria

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Performance Evaluations Employee performance shall be evaluated and communicated on a yearly basis as required under County policy. Performance evaluations are used to demonstrate to employees that they are valued; record how an employee’s performance meet the requirements of the job; create a job history record; identify employee strengths and areas for enhancement; assist the employee and supervisor in an effort to attain the highest level of performance; and reinforce performance standards. Every effort will be made to include substantiated information within an employee’s performance evaluation. Non-recurring discipline history which is more than two (2) years old will not be referenced in performance evaluations. The County shall ensure employee performance evaluations are conducted in accordance with County and departmental policy. Performance evaluations and disciplinary matters shall only be conducted by County employees. When an employee who does not agree with the overall rating he/she receives on his/her written performance evaluation, he/she shall discuss and attempt to resolve the differences with his/her immediate supervisor. If discussion with his/her immediate supervisor does not result in resolution of the differences, the employee may file a written request to meet with the next level of management. Said request shall state the unresolved issues and the specific changes in the written performance evaluation the employee is seeking. The appropriate manager shall meet with the employee to discuss the unresolved issues. If the issues are not resolved to the employee’s satisfaction following discussion with the appropriate manager, the employee may within thirty (30) working days file a written request for a meeting with the department head. Within fourteen (14) working days of receipt of a written request stating the unresolved issues and the desired changes in the written performance evaluation, the department head shall meet with the employee to discuss the issues. Within ten (10) working days of said meeting, the department head shall respond in writing to the employee. The decision of the Department Head shall be final and not subject to the grievance procedure. An employee may submit a written response to his/her evaluation that shall be placed in his/her personnel file.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ at TIPS at ▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇@t ▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇