Period of Validity of Proposals Sample Clauses

The 'Period of Validity of Proposals' clause defines the length of time during which submitted proposals remain binding and open for acceptance by the recipient. Typically, this period is specified in the solicitation documents, requiring bidders to honor their offers for a set number of days after submission, such as 60 or 90 days. This clause ensures that the recipient has sufficient time to evaluate all proposals and make a decision without the risk of offers being withdrawn or altered, thereby promoting fairness and stability in the procurement process.
Period of Validity of Proposals. The offer outlined in the proposal must be valid for a minimum period of 90 calendar days after the closing date. A proposal valid for a shorter period may be rejected by UNAIDS. In exceptional circumstances, UNAIDS may solicit the bidder’s consent to an extension of the period of validity. The request and the responses thereto shall be made in writing. Any bidder granting the request will not be required nor permitted to modify its proposal.
View SourceView Similar (8)
Period of Validity of Proposals. Any offer made by PROSIM is only valid for a period specified in the PROPOSAL, by default 30 days. Beyond this deadline PROSIM will no longer be required to comply with the various provisions of the PROPOSAL and will in particular be free to reassess the price in the event of a new consultation. As part of an ONLINE SALE, the products are offered for sale as long as it is possible to add them to the "CART".
View SourceView Similar (3)
Period of Validity of Proposals. Proposals shall remain valid for sixty (60) days after the date of Proposal submission prescribed by UNDP, pursuant to the deadline clause. A Proposal valid for a shorter period may be rejected by UNDP on the grounds that it is non-responsive. In exceptional circumstances, UNDP may solicit the Offeror’s consent to an extension of the period of validity. The request and the responses thereto shall be made in writing. An Offeror granting the request will not be required nor permitted to modify its Proposal.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Period of Validity of Proposals. The offer outlined in the proposal must be valid for a minimum period of 120 calendar days after the closing date. A proposal valid for a shorter period may be rejected by WHO. In exceptional circumstances, WHO may solicit the bidder’s consent to an extension of the period of validity. The request and the responses thereto shall be made in writing. Any bidder granting such an extension will not, however, be permitted to otherwise modify its proposal. Proposals must be received at WHO at the e-mail address: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇▇ (use subject: WHO Bid Ref. Scoping review on the ethical review of health policy and systems research) no later than 31 August 2016 23:59 GMT. WHO may, at its own discretion, extend this closing date for the submission of proposals by notifying all bidders thereof in writing. Any proposal received by WHO after the closing date for submission of proposals may be rejected. WHO may, at any time before the closing date, for any reason, whether on its own initiative or in response to a clarification requested by a (prospective) bidder, modify the call by written amendment. Amendments could, inter alia, include modification of the project scope or requirements, the project timeline expectations and/or extension of the closing date for submission. All prospective bidders that have submitted a proposal with regard to the call will be notified in writing of all amendments to the call and will, where applicable, be invited to amend their proposal accordingly.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Period of Validity of Proposals. Proposals shall remain valid for a period of ninety (90) days from the date fixed for opening of proposals in the Request for Proposal. A proposal valid for a shorter period may be rejected by UNDP on the grounds that it is non-responsive.
View Source
Period of Validity of Proposals. Proposals shall remain valid for 60 days after the date of Proposal submission indicated in the table above. Submission Deadline: 29 April 2024 Proposal: The proposal to be submitted shall include but not limited to the below information: The audit firm is familiar with International Auditing Standards (ISA 800/805), ISRS 4400 Experience in auditing ODA projects/Public funds Understanding of the audit requirements Understanding the deliverable of the requirements Approach and methodology to be used. Initiatives (if any) for improving audit implementation plan. Implementation plan (starting time and total time needed) Human resources arrangement: Team leader should be qualified independent auditors.
View Source

Related to Period of Validity of Proposals

  • Period of Validity of Bids a) Bids submitted by the bidders shall remain valid during the period specified in the NIB/ bidding document. A Bid valid for a shorter period shall be rejected by the procuring entity as non-responsive Bid. b) Prior to the expiry of the period of validity of Bids, the procuring entity, in exceptional circumstances, may request the bidders to extend the bid validity period for an additional specified period of time. A bidder may refuse the request and such refusal shall be treated as withdrawal of Bid and in such circumstances bid security shall not be forfeited. c) Bidders that agree to an extension of the period of validity of their Bids shall extend or get extended the period of validity of bid securities submitted by them or submit new bid securities to cover the extended period of validity of their bids. A bidder whose bid security is not extended, or that has not submitted a new bid security, is considered to have refused the request to extend the period of validity of its Bid.

  • Period of Validity of Tenders 17.1 Tenders shall remain valid for the Tender Validity period specified in the TDS. The Tender Validity period starts from the date fixed for the Tender submission deadline (as prescribed by the Procuring Entity in accordance with ITT 21.1). A Tender valid for a shorter period shall be rejected by the Procuring Entity as non-responsive. 17.2 In exceptional circumstances, prior to the expiration of the Tender validity period, the Procuring Entity may request Tenderers to extend the period of validity of their Tenders. The request and the responses shall be made in writing. If a Tender Security is requested in accordance with ITT 18, it shall also be extended for a corresponding period. A Tenderer may refuse the request without forfeiting its Tender Security. A Tenderer granting the request shall not be required or permitted to modify its Tender, except as provided in ITT 17.3. 17.3 If the award is delayed by a period exceeding the number of days to be specified in the TDS days beyond the expiry of the initial tender validity period, the Contract price shall be determined as follows: a) in the case of fixed price contracts, the Contract price shall be the tender price adjusted by the factor specified in the TDS; b) in the case of adjustable price contracts, no adjustment shall be made; or in any case, tender evaluation shall be based on the tender price without taking into consideration the applicable correction from those indicated above.

  • SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals will be submitted to the attention of ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ at ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern, April 8, 2025.

  • Period of validity The Rate Contract will be valid for period of two year from the date of issue date of Rate Contract. It may be further extended after approval of competent authority till the finalization of new rate contract, if required.

  • Evaluation of Proposals All proposals received shall be reviewed to determine whether they meet the format requirements and the standards specified in the request for sealed proposals. The district shall evaluate the qualifications of the proposers based solely upon the criteria and evaluation methodology set forth in the request for sealed proposals, and shall assign a best value score to each proposal. Once the evaluation is complete, all responsive proposals shall be ranked from the highest best value to the lowest best value to the district.