Question Answer Sample Clauses
Question Answer. 1. Who is/are the incumbent consultant(s) and how long have they been in place? The services sought in this procurement are not currently provided as a state term contract for the State of Florida. The Department of Management Services, Division of State Group Insurance has the following current contracts: DMS 13/14-018A with ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ to provide an independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services; DMS 13/14-018B with ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇ to provide an independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services and DMS 13/14-018C with Mercer to provide an independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services. The contract effective dates for the Division of State Group Insurance contracts are: DMS 13/14-018A: 7/23/2014 DMS 13/14-018B: 8/29/2014 DMS 13/14-018C: 7/23/2014 The Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement has the following current contracts: DMS 17/18- 004 with ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇ and DMS 10/11-015 with Milliman to provide actuarial services. The contract effective dates for the Division of Retirement contracts are: DMS 17/18-004: 9/18/2018 DMS 10/11-015: 7/1/2011
2. Why did DMS decide to bid these services at this time? Reference RFP subsection 1.1, Objective.
3. Are the services outlined in RFP comparable to those currently being provided by the incumbent consultant(s)? The services sought in this procurement are not currently provided as a state term contract for the State of Florida. The Department’s current contracts for independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services are specific to the Department’s needs. The three service categories have been broadened for this procurement to accommodate the needs of multiple customers under the awarded state term contract(s).
4. What were the total consulting fees for these services during each of the last three years? What were the fees by Service Category – Benefits Consulting, Actuarial, and Claim Audit? Reference RFP subsection 1.2,
Question Answer. What kind of (personal) data is processed in the service? If you process ‘Sensitive Personal Data’ as mentioned in the GDPR, explicitly mention what type of data exactly. ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.
Question Answer. What devices can I use to access ▇▇▇▇ Parent? ▇▇▇▇ Parent can be accessed via any desktop PC or laptop. The ▇▇▇▇ Parent app can be accessed on Apple or Android devices. ▇▇▇▇ Parent supports Android version 4.4 (kitkat) and above, and IOS version 8 and above.
Question Answer. Who is eligible for this program? Dependent children* of all full time employees following successful completion of the probationary period
Question Answer. What will we do when you tell us about an incorrect or unauthorised payment? We’ll let you know when we’ve received your report of an incorrect or unauthorised payment. Please see clauses 60 (‘Transaction Queries’), 61 (‘Complaints, disputed transactions and investigations’) and 62 (‘Results of our investigations’) for details about how to raise a transaction query, make a complaint (if you are not satisfied with the outcome of our investigation) and how we deal with investigations. Will I always get my money back? No. However, you may get your money back in instances where: • you have informed us immediately for circumstances outlined in clause 7 (‘Reporting a lost or stolen card, cheque or device; suspected unauthorised transaction, breach of access code or PIN, or a mistaken internet payment’); or • you have told us about the transaction within the timeframes set out in clause 61 (‘Complaints, disputed transactions and investigations’) (where applicable); and • a chargeback right exists and was found in your favour; or • a recall of a payment from another bank is successful. There are other circumstances in which we won’t make a refund to you. The ePayments Code provides more information about when you might, or might not, be liable, and on any limits on your or our liability. Can we take back a refund we’ve made? Yes. We can take back refunds after giving you reasonable notice in the following circumstances: • if you gave us the wrong information and we have not been able to recover the payment from the BPAY® ▇▇▇▇▇▇ within 20 Business Days of requesting; or • certain unauthorised payments where the ePayments Code make you responsible; or • if information becomes available to us at a later date and we can prove that you acted fraudulently; or • if a chargeback right that existed is later found to be not in your favour; or • if an unauthorised payment was made because you intentionally or with carelessness failed to keep your payment device safe. For example, if you knowingly gave your card and PIN to someone else. What if it’s clear that you’ve contributed to the loss through fraud or failed to keep your security details safe? You’re responsible for all payments from your account until you’ve reported the event to us. The amount of loss you are responsible for is described in section 11 of the ePayments Code. What if it’s clear you’ve been extremely careless in relation to securing your pass code? You’re responsible for all payments from your account un...
Question Answer. Has the entity obtained, or is it obtaining, +security holder approval for the issue under listing rule 7.1? No
Question Answer. Security description
Question Answer. Question & Answer allows Customer to conduct a Question & Answer session while the participating callers are in Listen Only. This feature is available to Customer at no additional charge.
Question Answer. Identify the competent supervisory authorities (e.g. in accordance with Clause 13 of the EU SCCs) In respect of the EU SCCs, means the competent supervisory authority determined in accordance with Clause 13 of the EU SCCs. In respect of the UK Addendum, means the UK Information Commissioner's Office.
Question Answer. 7 On attachment C: price Proposal, there are limited UNSPSC does and product category descriptions in comparison to the categories defined in the RFP document. Example noted below. Reference Addendum 1, Attachment C: Price Proposal.
2.3.1 Qualification Questions Question 21 requires offerors to agree "to accept all terms and conditions listed in the RFP, draft contract and General Contract Conditions with no exceptions[,]" which appears to indicate that all terms and conditions of these documents are mandatory, and states that proposals will not be considered unless this agreement is indicated. However, RFP § 1.10 provides that the State may accept a deviation of requirements if the Department determines it is in the best interests of the Department or the State to accept the deviation. How should an offeror propose deviations or alternative terms or conditions that the offeror believes will be acceptable to the Department without the Department rejecting the proposal? Reference Addendum 1, Section 2.3.1 Qualification Questions, Question 21. Respondents may propose suggested language to the draft Contract and General Contract Conditions for the Department's consideration, but first must answer yes and agree to all Qualification Questions listed in the RFP.