Recency Assessment Clause Samples

Recency Assessment. An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.
View SourceView Similar (8)
Recency Assessment. The SSEB will assess offerors’ past performance information to determine if it is recent. Projects will be deemed recent if a project has not concluded more than five (5) years prior to the date of the solicitation. For contracts or TOs that are actively being performed, performance must be substantially complete (minimum 50% complete as of the date of solicitation). Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Recency Assessment. The Government will evaluate whether the project/contract is currently on-going or was completed within the past five years, considering the issue date of the RFP. Projects that are not recent will not be considered further.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Recency Assessment. An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past three years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated. Note: If any part of the performance falls within the past three years, the contract in its entirety may be considered/evaluated for past performance. Past performance within the Department of Defense, and OSD(A&S) in particular, is considered more relevant than performance within other Government or commercial customers. The Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of recent performance information obtained. For each recent past performance reference reviewed, the relevance of the work performed will be assessed. A relevancy determination of the offeror’s past performance will be made based upon similarity in scope and complexity to the requirements outlined in the PWS. The past performance information forms and information obtained from other sources will be used to establish the degree of relevancy of past performance. The Government will use the following degrees of relevancy when assessing recent, relevant contracts. Relevancy will be determined by comparing the work performed to the experience elements.
View Source

Related to Recency Assessment

  • Security Assessment If Accenture reasonably determines, or in good faith believes, that Supplier’s security practices or procedures do not meet Supplier’s obligations under the Agreement, then Accenture will notify Supplier of the deficiencies. Supplier will without unreasonable delay: (i) correct such deficiencies at its own expense; (ii) permit Accenture, or its duly authorized representatives, to assess Supplier’s security-related activities that are relevant to the Agreement; and (iii) timely complete a security questionnaire from Accenture on a periodic basis upon Accenture’s request. Security issues identified by Accenture will be assigned risk ratings and an agreed-to timeframe to remediate. Supplier will remediate all the security issues identified within the agreed to timeframes. Upon Supplier’s failure to remediate any high or medium rated security issues within the stated timeframes, Accenture may terminate the Agreement in accordance with Section 8 above.

  • Joint Assessment If the Premises are not separately assessed, Lessee's liability shall be an equitable proportion of the Real Property Taxes for all of the land and improvements included within the tax parcel assessed, such proportion to be conclusively determined by Lessor from the respective valuations assigned in the assessor's work sheets or such other information as may be reasonably available.

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013). 6.3.2 Teachers shall use their professional judgment to determine which assessment and/or evaluation tool(s) from the Board list of preapproved assessment tools is applicable, for which student(s), as well as the frequency and timing of the tool. In order to inform their instruction, teachers must utilize diagnostic assessment during the school year.

  • No Joint Assessment Borrower shall not, and shall not permit Mortgage Borrower to, suffer, permit or initiate the joint assessment of any Individual Property (a) with any other real property constituting a tax lot separate from such Individual Property, and (b) which constitutes real property with any portion of such Individual Property which may be deemed to constitute personal property, or any other procedure whereby the lien of any taxes which may be levied against such personal property shall be assessed or levied or charged to such real property portion of the Individual Property, except as required by Legal Requirements.