Common use of Referral Procedure Clause in Contracts

Referral Procedure. a) When the Plywood Evaluation Committee has decided the outcome of a Request for Job Evaluation, it shall transmit its decision to the appropriate Plant Job Review Committee. b) When an employee’s request for re-evaluation results in no change being made in the job grade, or in a reduction, or when a Management requests results in no change or in an increase, the Plywood Evaluation Committee shall give to the appropriate Review Committee a short statement of the reasons for the decision. The statement should not go into great detail, but should indicate the criteria used in sufficient depth to show the applicant that the request was given adequate attention. Supplement No. 7, Article 12 Continued c) An evaluation done by the Plywood Evaluation Committee shall be final and binding on the parties, but at any time after five (5) years since the last evaluation or re-evaluation of a job, Management or an individual employee may submit a request for re-evaluation of that job and no other reason than the elapsed time shall be necessary. d) If the Plywood Evaluation Committee is unable to reach agreement regarding the disposition of a Request for Job Evaluation or any other matter regarding the job evaluation program which falls within their jurisdiction the matter shall be referred to CONIFER and to IWA-CANADA for settlement. e) All communication between any Plant Review Committee and the Plywood Evaluation Committee referred to above shall be effective by sending one (1) copy to the Union representative or representatives on the Committee and one (1) copy to the Employer representative or representatives. In the case of communications to a Plant Review Committee, the Union representatives will be addressed care of the office of the appropriate Union local and the employer representative care of the Company’s offices at the Plant. In the case of communications to the Plywood Evaluation Committee, the union representative will be addressed care of the offices of IWA-CANADA, Vancouver, and the Employer representative care of the offices of CONIFER.

Referral Procedure. a) When the Plywood Evaluation Committee has decided the outcome of a Request for Job Evaluation, it shall transmit its decision to the appropriate Plant Job Review Committee. b) When an employee’s request for re-evaluation results in no change being made in the job grade, or in a reduction, or when a Management requests results in no change or in an increase, the Plywood Evaluation Committee shall give to the appropriate Review Committee a short statement of the reasons for the decision. The statement should not go into great detail, but should indicate the criteria used in sufficient depth to show the applicant that the request was given adequate attention. Supplement No. 7, Article 12 Continued. c) An evaluation done by the Plywood Evaluation Committee shall be final and binding on the parties, but at any time after five (5) years since the last evaluation or re-evaluation of a job, Management or an individual employee may submit a request for re-evaluation of that job and no other reason than the elapsed time shall be necessary. d) If the Plywood Evaluation Committee is unable to reach agreement regarding the disposition of a Request for Job Evaluation or any other matter regarding the job evaluation program which falls within their jurisdiction the matter shall be referred to CONIFER and to IWA-CANADA the USW for settlement. e) All communication between any Plant Review Committee and the Plywood Evaluation Committee referred to above shall be effective by sending one (1) copy to the Union representative or representatives on the Committee and one (1) copy to the Employer representative or representatives. In the case of communications to a Plant Review Committee, the Union representatives will be addressed care of the office of the appropriate Union local and the employer representative care of the Company’s offices at the Plant. In the case of communications to the Plywood Evaluation Committee, the union representative will be addressed care of the offices of IWA-CANADAthe USW, Vancouver, and the Employer representative care of the offices of CONIFER.

Referral Procedure. a) When the Plywood Sawmill Evaluation Committee has decided the outcome of a Request for Job Evaluation, it shall transmit its decision to the appropriate Plant Job Review Committee. b) When an employee’s 's request for re-evaluation results in no change being made in the job grade, or in a reduction, or when a Management requests request results in no change or in an increase, the Plywood Sawmill Evaluation Committee shall give to the appropriate Review Committee a short statement of the reasons for the decision. The statement should not go into great detail, but should indicate the criteria used in sufficient depth to show the applicant that the request was given adequate attention. Supplement No. 7, Article 12 Continued. c) An evaluation done by the Plywood Sawmill Evaluation Committee shall be final and binding on the parties, but at any time after five (5) years since the last evaluation or re-evaluation of a job, Management or an individual employee may submit a request for re-evaluation of that job and no other reason than the elapsed time shall be necessary. d) If the Plywood Sawmill Evaluation Committee is unable to reach agreement regarding the disposition of a Request for Job Evaluation or any other matter regarding the job evaluation program Job Evaluation Program which falls within their jurisdiction the matter shall be referred to CONIFER and to IWA-CANADA the B. C. Northern Interior Industry Standing Committee for settlement. e) All communication between any Plant Review Committee and the Plywood Sawmill Evaluation Committee referred to above shall be effective by sending one (1) copy to the Union representative or representatives on the Committee and one one (1) copy to the Employer representative or representatives. In the case of communications to a Plant Review Committee, the Union representatives will be addressed care of the office of the appropriate Union local and the employer representative care of the Company’s offices at the PlantLocal. In the case of communications to the Plywood Sawmill Evaluation Committee, the union Union representative will be addressed care of the offices of IWA-CANADA, Vancouver, Regional Council No. 1 of the IWA and the Employer representative care of the offices of CONIFERthe Company. The Employer representative will then designate their evaluator regarding the disposition of any request for job evaluation.

Referral Procedure. (a) When the Plywood Sawmill Evaluation Committee has decided the outcome of a Request for Job Evaluation, it shall transmit its decision to the appropriate Plant Job Review Committee. (b) When an employee’s 's request for re-evaluation results in no change being made in the job grade, or in a reduction, reduction or when a Management requests request results in no change or in an increase, the Plywood Sawmill Evaluation Committee shall give to the appropriate Review Committee a short statement of the reasons for the decision. The statement should not go into great detail, but should indicate the criteria used in sufficient depth to show the applicant that the request was given adequate attention. Supplement No. 7, Article 12 Continued. (c) An evaluation done by the Plywood Sawmill Evaluation Committee shall be final and binding on the parties, but at any time after five (5) years since the last evaluation or re-evaluation of a job, Management or an individual employee may submit a request for re-evaluation of that job and no other reason than the elapsed time shall be necessary. (d) If the Plywood Sawmill Evaluation Committee is unable to reach agreement regarding the disposition of a Request for Job Evaluation or any other matter regarding the job evaluation program which falls within their jurisdiction jurisdiction, the matter shall be referred to CONIFER the Company's Industrial Relations Department and to IWA-CANADA United Steelworkers for settlement. (e) All communication between any Plant Review Committee and the Plywood Sawmill Evaluation Committee referred to above shall be effective effected by sending one (1) copy to the Union representative or representatives on the Committee committee and one (1) copy to the Employer Company representative or representatives. In the case of communications to a Plant Review Committee, the Union representatives will be addressed in care of the office of the appropriate Local Union local and the employer Company representative in care of the Company’s 's offices at the Plant. In the case of communications to the Plywood Sawmill Evaluation Committee, the union Union representative will be addressed in care of the offices office of IWA-CANADAUnited Steelworkers, Vancouver, and the Employer Company representative in care of the offices Industrial Relations Department of CONIFERthe Company.