Scope of Evidence Sample Clauses

Scope of Evidence. Work performed by a faculty member prior to their appointment at the University may be considered in providing context for the faculty member’s pattern of accomplishment in scholarship and creativity. However, for any such work to be included in any retention, tenure, or promotion evaluation, it must be identified in the faculty member’s initial letter of appointment or initial FAP. If it is included in the initial letter of appointment or initial FAP, it may be considered as evidence for retention, promotion, and/or tenure at the University.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Scope of Evidence. 2.1 In my evidence I will I. Describe the structure of the Developer and its arrangements with the Council
View Source
Scope of Evidence. Work performed by a faculty member prior to their appointment at the University may be considered in providing context for the faculty PHPEHU¶V SDWWHUQ RI DFFRPSOLVKPH creativity. However, for any such work to be included in any retention, tenure, or promotion evaluation, it must be identified in the faculty PHPEHU¶V LQLWLDOor inOitiHal WFAWP.HIUf it isRinIclu deDd Sin SRLQWPH the initial letter of appointment or initial FAP, it may be considered as evidence for retention, promotion, and/or tenure at the University.
View Source
Scope of Evidence. The academic units shall consider all written evidence provided by the department chair, personnel committees and other knowledgeable individuals. The minimum list of written evidence shall include letters from the department chair (except that when conflicts of interest are present, a suitable substitute will be found) and the department personnel committee.
View Source

Related to Scope of Evidence

  • Scope of Agreement Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to entitle Executive to continued employment with the Company or its Subsidiaries, and if Executive’s employment with the Company shall terminate prior to a Change in Control, Executive shall have no further rights under this Agreement (except as otherwise provided hereunder); provided, however, that any termination of Executive’s employment during the Termination Period shall be subject to all of the provisions of this Agreement.

  • Scope of Engagement Client hereby engages each of Arete and IndieBrokers to act as co-managers of the proposed Offering on a “Best Efforts” basis. Therefore, Client understands that there is no guarantee that the Co-Managers will be able to successfully complete the Offering or successfully assist Client in raising capital and neither Co-Manager has any obligation to purchase or sell any Securities. In addition, Client will be solely responsible for the following: a. Collection and handling of investor funds in a segregated account maintained at a national banking institution (the Co-Managers will not hold or have control over investor funds or securities); b. With respect to potential investors, who inquire through the Masterworks Platform, allocation of potential investors to be solicited by each Co-Manager; c. Execution of securities subscriptions and purchases through the Masterworks Platform; and d. The issuance of Securities directly to investors in the Offering.

  • PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF AGREEMENT 1.01 The purpose of this Agreement is to maintain harmonious and mutually beneficial relationships between the Employer, the Union and the employees and to set forth herein certain terms and conditions of employment upon which agreement has been reached through collective bargaining. 1.02 The parties to this Agreement share a desire to improve the quality of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency and to promote the well-being and increased efficiency of its employees to the end that the people of Canada will be well and efficiently served. Accordingly, the parties are determined to establish, within the framework provided by law, an effective working relationship at all levels of the Agency in which members of the bargaining units are employed.

  • Scope of Audit Customer shall provide at least sixty days advance notice of any audit unless mandatory Data Protection Law or a competent data protection authority requires shorter notice. The frequency and scope of any audits shall be mutually agreed between the parties acting reasonably and in good faith. Customer audits shall be limited in time to a maximum of three business days. Beyond such restrictions, the parties will use current certifications or other audit reports to avoid or minimize repetitive audits. Customer shall provide the results of any audit to SAP.

  • Scope of Cooperation 1. The Authorities recognise the importance of close communication concerning the Covered CCPs and intend to cooperate regarding: a) general issues, including with respect to regulatory, supervisory, enforcement or other developments concerning the Covered CCPs and Australia; b) issues relevant to the operations, activities and services of the Covered CCPs; c) the coordination of supervisory activities and, where appropriate and consistent with applicable laws and each Authority’s mandate, providing assistance in the implementation of enforcement decisions; d) any other areas of mutual interest. 2. The Authorities recognise in particular the importance of close cooperation in the event that a Covered CCP, particularly one whose failure likely would be systemically important to an Authority, experiences, or is threatened by, a potential financial crisis or other Emergency Situation. One or both of the Local Authorities should provide notification to ESMA, and ESMA should provide notification to the Local Authorities, consistent with Article 3(4) below and each Authority should keep the other Authorities appropriately informed throughout the Emergency Situation. The Local Authorities should coordinate and lead in an Emergency Situation and should consult with and take account of the views of ESMA to the greatest extent practicable. ESMA should coordinate with the relevant CBI(s) regarding an Emergency Situation of a Covered CCP and any emergency measures that the CBI may consider appropriate. 3. Cooperation will be most useful in circumstances where issues of regulatory, supervisory or enforcement concern may arise, including but not limited to: a) the initial application of a Covered CCP for recognition in the European Union pursuant to Article 25 of EMIR and the periodic reviews of its recognition pursuant to Article 25(5) of EMIR; b) ESMA’s assessment of compliance and monitoring of the ongoing compliance by a Covered CCP with the Recognition Conditions; c) the tiering determination of a Covered CCP by ESMA pursuant to Article 25(2a) of EMIR; d) changes in a Covered CCP's internal rules, policies and procedures that could affect the way in which the Covered CCP complies with any Recognition Conditions; e) regulatory, supervisory or enforcement actions or approvals taken by a Local Authority or ESMA in relation to a Covered CCP, including changes to the relevant obligations and requirements to which the Covered CCPs are subject that may impact the Covered CCPs' continued compliance with the Recognition Conditions; and f) changes to regulatory status or requirements that could result in a change in the regulatory status of, relief granted to, or supervisory treatment of a Covered CCP and potentially could disrupt cross-border clearing arrangements.