Selection of Evaluators Sample Clauses

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Selection of Evaluators. 1) The evaluation of Unit Members will be performed by the Principal, the Assistant Principal or their administrative designee. The assignment of evaluators shall be the responsibility of the Principal. The Superintendent reserves the right to assign evaluators. 2) The Unit Member to be evaluated may request that a second person from the District certificated staff of their choosing be involved in the evaluation process. 3) Moreover, if in the process of the evaluation procedure, or at the conclusion thereof, the Unit Member being evaluated should have a significant disagreement with the evaluator(s), they may request a new evaluation by a professional team. The professional team of three
View SourceView Similar (6)
Selection of Evaluators a) The Department Head shall select a full-time faculty member to be the evaluator if the Department Head is not conducting the evaluation. b) No one involved in the direct evaluation of the evaluee shall be a close relative of the evaluee (e.g., spouse/partner, son, son-in-law, daughter, daughter-in-law, mother, mother-in-law, father, father-in-law, brother, brother-in-law, sister, sister-in-law, grandmother, grandmother-in-law, grandfather, grandfather-in-law, grandchild of the employee, or any person living in the immediate household of the employee). c) If the Department Head is a close relative of the evaluee, the appropriate ▇▇▇▇ will assume the Department Head’s role in the evaluation process. If the ▇▇▇▇ is a close relative of the evaluee, the appropriate vice president will name another administrator to assume the ▇▇▇▇’▇ role.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Selection of Evaluators. 1) The evaluation of unit members will be performed by the Principal, the Assistant Principal or their administrative designee. The assignment of evaluators shall be the responsibility of the Principal. The Superintendent reserves the right to assign evaluators. 2) The unit member to be evaluated may request that a second person from the District certificated staff of his/her choosing be involved in the evaluation process. 3) Moreover, if in the process of the evaluation procedure, or at the conclusion thereof, the unit member being evaluated should have a significant disagreement with the evaluator(s), he/she may request a new evaluation by a professional team. The professional team of three (3) shall consist of (1) the principal or his administrative designee, (2) a member selected from the District administrative staff by the unit member to be evaluated, and (3) the appropriate Subject Area Coordinator or a unit member mutually agreed upon by the principal and the unit member being evaluated.
View Source
Selection of Evaluators. This was part of the call as well. The proposals have not been evaluated by the FINODEX partners at any point. An open call was opened and published in our typical channels (website, newsletter and twitter account), in order to get a good number of experts for the evaluation. The selection of those experts was done among the partners within FINODEX consortium following a very easy approach. • The evaluators could not be employees from FINODEX partners, nor EC workers, nor proposers or having a conflict of interest. • An automatic questionnaire was completed by the potential evaluators and an automatic score was calculated considering their expertise on open data, venture capital and acceleration of companies. • We followed the principle of no more than two evaluators from the same country to avoid conflicts of interest. • Some evaluators were used only in one or two phases of the acceleration according to the volume of proposals that were to be evaluated on each phase. • Some changes were introduced in the panels, from phase 3 onwards, towards a more expertise on venture capital and start-ups as indicated by the European Commission.
View Source

Related to Selection of Evaluators

  • Selection of Subcontractors Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment: The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age, or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract. a. The contractor shall notify all potential subcontractors, suppliers, and lessors of their EEO obligations under this contract. b. The contractor will use good faith efforts to ensure subcontractor compliance with their EEO obligations.

  • Selection of Mediator A single mediator that is acceptable to both parties shall be used to mediate the dispute. The mediator will be knowledgeable in the subject matter of this Contract, if possible.

  • Selection of Sub-Adviser(s) The Adviser shall have the authority hereunder to select and retain sub-advisers, including an affiliated person (as defined under the ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) of the Adviser (each a “Sub-Adviser”), for each of the Funds referenced in Schedule A to perform some or all of the services for which the Adviser is responsible pursuant to this Agreement. The Adviser shall supervise the activities of the sub-adviser(s), and the retention of a sub-adviser by the Adviser shall not relieve the Adviser of its responsibilities under this Agreement. Any such sub-adviser shall be registered and in good standing with the Commission and capable of performing its sub- advisory duties pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees and, except as otherwise permitted by the 1940 Act or by rule or regulation, a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the applicable Fund. The Adviser will compensate the sub-adviser for its services to the Funds.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Benchmarking The Parties shall comply with the provisions of Framework Schedule 12 (Continuous Improvement and Benchmarking) in relation to the benchmarking of any or all of the Goods and/or Services.