Summary and Conclusion Clause Samples

Summary and Conclusion a) Restate project description and nature of project. b) Restate brief sentence of negative field survey results. c) Closing statements should be “No historic properties will be impacted by the project. No further work recommended.” d) Standard paragraph for discovery situation following the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department’s Standard Specifications for Highway Construction.

Summary and Conclusion. All workers have a responsibility to act respectfully toward each other and have a responsibility to cooperate with any efforts to investigate and resolve matters pertaining to this policy. Butcher Enterprises will take every effort practicable to prevent harassment, discrimination and violence in the workplace and will work diligently to resolve any reported issue to ensure a safe and comfortable working environment.

Summary and Conclusion. The conceptual models of information flow were designed to illustrate the flow of environmental information between local and central governments and local stakeholders in the decision making process. Decision making within the environmental sector is a highly complex process that relies on complex patterns of data exchange between stakeholders and local, regional and central levels of government. Understanding and quantifying these relationships is key to designing an effective decision support system to enable informed decisions. The largest number of environmental issues overall involved habitat issues, on average 36% of issues identified by stakeholder groups and 49% of issues identified by local government. Although information was supplied for these decisions from all sources, for local governments these tended to be skewed towards government sources. Foresters and nature watcher stakeholders both made use of their own internal management plans or records for these decisions (26% and 28%, respectively), but also relied on government agencies, scientific studies and consultants for information for these decisions. Socio-economic issues were more important for the stakeholder groups (32% of issues) compared to the local government levels (23%). In particular nature watchers, farmers and recreational access stakeholder groups identified relatively more issues (an average of 42%). They used a variety of information sources for these decisions with particularly consultants (24%), scientific studies (19%) and the internet (14%) important for nature watchers, while farmers relied more on government sources (55% in total) instead of scientific studies and the internet, with consultants still quite important (27%). Recreational access stakeholders used all of the information sources for socio-economic decisions fairly evenly, as did the two levels of government. Decisions involving species were more important overall for stakeholder groups (average of 19% versus 6% for local government) and figured highly for hunters and fisheries stakeholders (average of 29% of decisions). These two stakeholder groups used a variety of information sources to make these decisions, consultants (17% for hunters and 18% for fisheries) and government agencies (19% for hunters, fisheries 27%) figuring highly. Interestingly farmers were the group that made the most use of scientific surveys for these types of decisions (29%). Hazard issues were relatively more important for the loc...

Summary and Conclusion. 151 BCNU's Section 19 applications raised a number of issues and objections which I have considered and decided for the reasons given above. My conclusions can be summarized as follows:

Summary and Conclusion. This chapter detailed the Christian dimensions of the CRM, thereby advancing the

Summary and Conclusion. Based upon the guidance criteria of NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Revision 1, licensees are to be able to conduct an evacuation of onsite non-essential personnel in the event of a SAE or GE. In addition, it is the staff’s position that licensees should have the capability to account for all individuals onsite during any emergency condition and determine the names of missing individuals within 30 minutes of the decision to conduct a site accountability. The capability to perform a site accountability should not be linked to a site evacuation because there are situations where it may not be advisable for safety reasons to evacuate the site but it may be necessary to perform an accounting of site personnel. By having this capability, licensees can perform an accountability at any time during an emergency as the situation warrants. Once a decision has been made to initiate an accountability, the objective should be to complete the accountability of all individuals onsite within the protected area within 30 minutes.

Summary and Conclusion. This deliverable D2.4 outlines the six simulation scenarios. Although they are artificial, the four scenarios in Berlin have been derived based on a statistical analysis of the real network data provided by the mobile network operators Deutsche Telekom. The scenarios in Hannover and Shinjuku are completely artificial. These well-defined scenarios provides reliable simulation and demonstration environments allowing comparison of various - simulation approaches by the consortium members as well as by external parties. With respect to the designed scenarios, the planned and ongoing ThoR tasks for the simulation and demonstration of 300 GHz wireless front/backhaul links will be conducted. Furthermore, this deliverable provides also the overview of foreseen experimental demonstrations.

Summary and Conclusion. The aforementioned research and case studies show how principles that guided the Court’s First Amendment religious freedom jurisprudence from the 1930s through the 1960s had important implications for the CRM. First, the Jehovah’s Witnesses resisted laws mandating the flag salute because their faith provided that such ceremonial practices were prohibited. In resisting laws nonviolently and pursuing litigation, the group tied the quest for religious rights with efforts to expand civil rights. In addition, in challenging Sunday blue laws that prohibited Saturday Sabbatarians from discriminating against Jews and others religious minorities, these religious minorities claimed that laws that interfered with their religious practices and gave Christian Sunday Sabbath observers an economic advantage abridged their First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Further examination of the principles and tactics of the CRM will show how Free Exercise and civil rights are two sides of the same coin. The view that God’s law is higher than the law of the State is a central ▇▇▇▇▇ of nonviolent civil disobedience powerfully expressed in the CRM. Like the Witnesses, civil rights activists were seeking to overturn discriminatory laws and politics that infringed constitutional rights. Because groups like the Witnesses proselytized their faith, solicited support for their cause, appealed to divine law to justify civil disobedience and finally prevailed, they helped to establish a climate of religious freedom. This climate prepared the way for civil rights protestors over a decade later who similarly appealed to divine law, engaged in civil disobedience and worked for the expansion of rights for the benefit of other groups. support even during the school day. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 343 US 306, 314 (1952). Nevertheless, the Court struggled to maintain this important balance. Students can voluntarily pray but the State must not “prescribe by law any particular form of prayer which is to be used as an official prayer in carrying on any program of governmentally sponsored religious activity.” ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, 370 US 421, 422, 430 (1962). The dominant concern for promoting national unity as the prerequisite for keeping America safe showed the limits of judicial tolerance for religious freedom. Perceived threats to national security loomed large in the face of increasing religious pluralism during the 1950s and 1960s. National unity was an important concern of the Court and, thus, th...

Summary and Conclusion a) Statement should be “No historic properties will be affected by the proposed project. No further work is recommended.” DRAFT The SHPO letter is submitted to the Section Head, or if absent, to the Lead for review. Documentation will then be sent to SHPO through the administrative assistant. The documentation will be submitted to SHPO after it has been reviewed and signed by the Division Head or Assistant Division Head. If comments need to be addressed, then the document will be sent back for corrections, and the staff will resubmit the corrected version to the Section Head, who will submit as described above. If time constraints prevent further review and editing, the Section Head may deem it appropriate to proceed with sending it to SHPO.