The Solution Clause Samples

The Solution. The Solution is integrated with the Application and includes services related to: - Fraud prevention; - Card pre-authorisation; - Payment;

The Solution. How did you find a solution? ● What CCS framework was used and how did it work? ● How did the CCS service/product help you to get over the challenge and solve the problem? ● How did you find the process? With CCS? With the supplier?

The Solution. 4.1 Eploy shall provide and maintain the Solution from the Go-Live Date. 4.2 If there is a delay of more than 30 days to the Go-Live Date caused by the Customer or any third party engaged at the Customer’s request, Eploy may invoice and require payment of Fees from the projected Go-Live Date before the delay intervened. 4.3 During the Term, Eploy shall provide the Customer with Eploy’s standard support services in accordance with the SLA.

The Solution. McGraw Hill has developed a web-based solution (the "Solution") that enables users to access certain online products and services ("Services") and related courses, content and information (together with the Services, the "McGraw Hill Content") offered by McGraw Hill through our website (the "Website") by purchasing a subscription. McGraw Hill hereby grants Subscriber a non-exclusive, non-transferable license to access and use the Solution, and allow each administrator, faculty member, and student enrolled by Subscriber (each a designated "End User") to access and use the Solution, through the Website, solely for educational purposes. End Users may access the Solution and the McGraw Hill Content in accordance with an access method offered by McGraw Hill and selected by Subscriber. All End Users other than K-12 students will be required to agree to the Terms of Use in order to access the Solution and the McGraw Hill Content. Payments of applicable fees to McGraw Hill are due within thirty (30) days of the date of invoice unless otherwise agreed to in writing.

The Solution. It is my belief that an appropriate private dispute resolution mechanism, that I have named “Settlement Consultation,” can be interjected when the parties themselves have reached an impasse in their settle- ment negotiations, but before litigation is started. It envisions the parties agreeing to bring in an impartial, experienced, knowledgeable and trusted person ( the “Settlement Consultant”). The Settlement Consultant’s role is to assist the parties to move past the stumbling block and to move forward in their negotiations to a mutually satisfactory settlement. The negotiations continue to be confidential. The Set- tlement Consultant would bring a fresh perspective to the negotiations, while the negotiations continue to be the property of the parties. The parties continue to have all the power and control to craft a settlement, or to decline to do so…but with a little help from a trusted friend. Hopefully the parties will see Settle- ment Consultation as merely a useful extension or continuation of their inter-party negotiation, and not as a hostile action by either party against the other.

The Solution. The highlight of the CCID partnership was the development of a continuous crystallization process for a Pfizer API, using an ▇▇▇- L i l l y lab scale 2 - pot MSMPR crystallization r ig, and subsequent scale up of the crystallization to 2 20 L crystallizers and i solation on a high frequency f i l ter ( HFF) in the Pfizer KTL facility in Ringaskiddy, with a successful 95 - hour

The Solution. The resource estimates provided in this Scope of Work (SOW) are based……. Resource levels may be adjusted by iLAB at a later date, upon approval of the “State Customer”, should additional testing efforts become known.

The Solution. Specific features and functionality provided as part of the Solution include: • collection of Solutions Data1, including Customer’s system logs, from Customer’s systems using Equipment, • analysis by Arctic Wolf Security Services of both Equipment and log data through the correlation of Solutions Data with threat and vulnerability information, • scanning of Customer’s internal and external systems, • escalation of Security Incidents (as defined below) in need of attention by Customer as set forth herein, • advisory recommendations intended to improve Customer’s security robustness, • calculation of Customer’s Security Score, as more fully described below, • Data Exploration module, if licensed by Customer as reflected on an Order Form (as more fully described below)2. • Host Containment functionality (as more fully described below), and • regular summary Executive Dashboard reports, as described herein and the Documentation.

The Solution. The issues mentioned above could be resolved by the use of standardised templates. Since APIC is committed to improve the relationship between the different stakeholders in the production process of safe API, APIC has developed this Quality Agreement Guideline including the corresponding templates. The APIC Task Force that did the work consisted of members from both specialised API/intermediate manufacturers and companies primarily making finished drug products. Hence APIC believes that the result represents best industry practice considering the needs and requirements that enter into such a Quality Agreement.