Tier One LRE Monitoring Clause Samples

Tier One LRE Monitoring. (1) By no later than December 31, 2005, and by no later than December 31 of each subsequent year, school districts will be identified for Tier One LRE Monitoring on the basis of the data analysis described in Section IV.4(C) of the Settlement Agreement. With respect to the initial identification of school districts in calendar year 2005, however, the parties may, by mutual agreement, identify and substitute particular school districts for Tier One LRE Monitoring in lieu of districts that would otherwise be identified on the basis of the data analysis described in Section IV.4(C) of the Settlement Agreement. (2) Monitoring visits will be conducted by a team consisting of a minimum of three members, with larger teams for larger school districts as appropriate. Team members will be appointed by the Bureau Director. Parents and advocates will be included as team members. (3) The process will involve an analysis of information similar to that used in regular cyclical monitoring with the following additional elements: (a) Analysis of data to determine if there is a legitimate basis for identification of the school district for Tier One LRE Monitoring; (b) A determination of whether the school district is identified for Tier One LRE Monitoring due to a refusal to comply with IDEA; (c) A determination of factors resulting in the school district’s identification; (d) Selection of appropriate intervention(s) to remedy deficiencies; (e) Continued oversight by PDE to determine whether intervention is effective; and (f) Other additions recommended by the Advisory Panel and approved by the (4) Visits will last a minimum of two days on-site, with adequate pre-visit preparation and post-visit follow-up. The process will start with facilitated self- assessment and validation of data. There will be on-site review of student files; interviews; and review of outcome data. (5) The team will conduct an exit conference with school district representatives. Team members will use the exit conference to discuss the elements of a CAP to remedy any deficiencies found to exist. (6) If deficiencies are found to exist, then the Bureau will follow up by submitting a written CAP no later than six weeks following the on-site visit. The school district will be required to complete the CAP. The CAP may require one, two, or more years to complete, with interim reporting and monitoring obligations. Required training will be identified to address specific areas in the CAP.
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Tier One LRE Monitoring

  • Program Monitoring The Contractor will make all records and documents required under this Agreement as outlined here, in OEC Policies and NHECC Policies available to the SRO or its designee, the SR Fiscal Officer or their designee and the OEC. Scheduled monitoring visits will take place twice a year. The SRO and OEC reserve the right to make unannounced visits.

  • Compliance Monitoring Grantee must be subject to compliance monitoring during the period of performance in which funds are Expended and up to three years following the closeout of all funds. In order to assure that the program can be adequately monitored, the following is required of Grantee: a. Grantee must maintain a financial tracking system provided by Florida Housing that ensures that CRF funds are Expended in accordance with the requirements in this Agreement. b. Grantee must maintain records on all awards to Eligible Persons or Households. These records must include, but are not limited to: i. Proof of income compliance (documentation from submission month, including but not limited to paystub, Florida unemployment statement, social security and/or disability statement, etc.); ii. Lease; and iii. Documentation of rental assistance payments made.

  • Performance Monitoring ‌ A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives. B. County shall periodically evaluate Subrecipient’s progress in complying with the terms of this Contract. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully during such monitoring. County shall report the findings of each monitoring to Subrecipient. C. County shall monitor the performance of Subrecipient against the goals, outcomes, milestones and performance standards required herein. Substandard performance, as determined by County, will constitute non-compliance with this Contract for which County may immediately terminate the Contract. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by Subrecipient within the time period specified by County, payment(s) will be denied in accordance with the provisions contained in this Paragraph 47 of this Contract. D. HUD in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart O, 570.902, will annually review the performance of County to determine whether County has carried out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assisted activities in a timely manner and has significantly disbursed CDBG funds and met the mandated “1.5 ratio” threshold. Subrecipient is responsible to ensure timely drawdown of funds.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Project Monitoring The Developer shall provide regular status reports to the NYISO in accordance with the monitoring requirements set forth in the Development Schedule, the Public Policy Transmission Planning Process Manual and Attachment Y of the OATT.