UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS Sample Clauses

The Unanticipated Discovery Protocols clause establishes procedures to follow when parties encounter unexpected findings or information during the course of a project or legal process. Typically, this clause outlines steps for promptly notifying relevant parties, securing the discovery site or materials, and determining how to proceed with further investigation or disclosure. Its core function is to ensure that unforeseen discoveries are managed in an orderly and transparent manner, minimizing disputes and ensuring compliance with legal or contractual obligations.
UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS. At a minimum, unanticipated discovery protocols for subgrants or contracts shall require the sub- grantee or contractor to immediately stop construction in the vicinity of the affected historic resource and take reasonable measures to avoid and minimize harm to the resource until the SHPO or THPO, sub- grantee or contractor, and Indian Tribes, as appropriate, have determined a suitable course of action within 15 calendar days. With the express permission of the SHPO and/or THPO, the sub-grantee or contractor may perform additional measures to secure the jobsite if the sub-grantee or contractor determines that unfinished work in the vicinity of the affected historic property would cause safety or security concerns.
View SourceView Similar (5)
UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS. At a minimum, unanticipated discovery protocols for subgrants or contracts shall require Subgrantee and any subcontractors to immediately stop construction in the vicinity of the affected historic resource and take reasonable measures to avoid and minimize harm to the resource until the NPS or THC, as appropriate, has determined a suitable course of action within 15 calendar days. With the express permission of THC, Subgrantee may perform additional measures to secure the jobsite if THC and Subgrantee determine that unfinished work in the vicinity of the affected historic property would cause safety or security concerns.
View SourceView Similar (3)
UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS. At a minimum, unanticipated discovery protocols for subgrants or contracts shall require the sub-grantee or contractor to immediately stop construction in the vicinity of the affected historic resource and take reasonable measures to avoid and minimize harm to the resource until the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and/or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO), sub-grantee or contractor, and Indian Tribes, as appropriate, have determined a suitable course of action within 15 calendar days. With the express permission of the SHPO and/or THPO, the sub-grantee or contractor may perform additional measures to secure the jobsite if the sub-grantee or contractor determines that unfinished work in the vicinity of the affected historic property would cause safety or security concerns
View Source
UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS. If project work includes ground disturbance and cultural resources are discovered in the course of project work, Recipient agrees that at a minimum, its contractors will immediately stop construction in the vicinity of the affected historic resource and take reasonable measures to avoid and minimize harm to the resources until the State Historic Preservation Officer and/or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO), sub-Recipient or contractor, and Indian Tribes, as appropriate, have determined a suitable course of action within 15 calendar days. With the express permission of the Ohio History Connection, the Recipient or contractor may perform additional measures to secure the jobsite if the Recipient or contractor determines that unfinished work in the vicinity of the affected historic property would cause safety or security concerns.
View Source
UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS. ‌ 1620 At a minimum, unanticipated discovery protocols for subgrants or contracts shall require the sub- 1621 grantee or contractor to immediately stop construction in the vicinity of the affected historic resource 1622 and take reasonable measures to avoid and minimize harm to the resource until the ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ sub-grantee or contractor, and Indian Tribes, as appropriate, have determined a suitable course of 1624 action within 15 calendar days. With the express permission of the SHPO and/or THPO, the sub- 1625 grantee or contractor may perform additional measures to secure the jobsite if the sub-grantee or 1626 contractor determines that unfinished work in the vicinity of the affected historic property would 1627 cause safety or security concerns. 1628 12. EASEMENT/COVENANT REQUIREMENT‌ 1629 Section 54 USC 302902 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires that HPF grantees agree to 1630 assume, after the completion of the project, the total cost of continued maintenance, repair and 1631 administration of the grant-assisted property in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary of the Interior. 1632 Accordingly, recipients awarded funds for the physical preservation of a historic site shall sign a 1633 Preservation Covenant/Easement with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) in which the 1634 site is located or to a nonprofit preservation organization acceptable to the NPS. NPS approval of a 1635 covenant/easement holder other than the SHPO must be in writing. The term of the 1636 covenant/easement must follow the guidance in the HPF Manual - Chapter 6 from the end date of this 1637 agreement. The covenant/easement must be executed by registering it with the deed of the property. 1638 A photocopy of the executed covenant/easement, stamped registered with the deed, must be submitted 1639 to the NPS ATR prior to the end of the award period of performance and final drawdown of funding. 1640 A draft copy of the covenant/easement must be submitted to the NPS ATR within one year for review 1641 and comment. Baseline documentation of the character defining features of the site must be 1642 documented prior to construction through photographs. Following the completion of all work, the 1643 preservation covenant/easement must document the grant assisted condition of the site and the 1644 character defining features included as part of the document registered with the deed. 1645 13. EQUIPMENT PURCHASES‌ 1646 Each item of equipment purchased under t...
View Source

Related to UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS

  • Corrective Measures If the Participating Generator fails to meet or maintain the requirements set forth in this Agreement and/or the CAISO Tariff, the CAISO shall be permitted to take any of the measures, contained or referenced in the CAISO Tariff, which the CAISO deems to be necessary to correct the situation.

  • Project Specific Milestones In addition to the milestones stated in Section 212.5 of the Tariff, as applicable, during the term of this ISA, Interconnection Customer shall ensure that it meets each of the following development milestones: 6.1 Substantial Site work completed. On or before July 1, 2021, Interconnection Customer must demonstrate completion of at least 20% of project site construction. At this time, Interconnection Customer must submit to Interconnected Transmission Owner and Transmission Provider initial drawings, certified by a professional engineer, of the Customer Interconnection Facilities. 6.2 Delivery of major electrical equipment. On or before July 15, 2021, Interconnection Customer must demonstrate that all generating units have been delivered to Interconnection Customer’s project site.

  • Reasonable Suspicion Testing All Employees Performing Safety-Sensitive Functions A. Reasonable suspicion testing for alcohol or controlled substances may be directed by the Employer for any employee performing safety-sensitive functions when there is reason to suspect that alcohol or controlled substance use may be adversely affecting the employee’s job performance or that the employee may present a danger to the physical safety of the employee or another. B. Specific objective grounds must be stated in writing that support the reasonable suspicion. Examples of specific objective grounds include but are not limited to: 1. Physical symptoms consistent with alcohol and/or controlled substance use; 2. Evidence or observation of alcohol or controlled substance use, possession, sale, or delivery; or 3. The occurrence of an accident(s) where a trained manager, supervisor or lead worker suspects alcohol or other controlled substance use may have been a factor.

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Telepak Networks will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Telepak Networks must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non-designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Telepak Networks will be required to provide the results of the Telepak Networks test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop. 2.1.6.2 Once Telepak Networks has isolated a trouble to the BellSouth provided Loop, and had issued a trouble report to BellSouth on the Loop, BellSouth will take the actions necessary to repair the Loop if a trouble actually exists. BellSouth will repair these Loops in the same time frames that BellSouth repairs similarly situated Loops to its End Users. 2.1.6.3 If Telepak Networks reports a trouble on a non-designed or designed Loop and no trouble actually exists, BellSouth will charge Telepak Networks for any dispatching and testing (both inside and outside the CO) required by BellSouth in order to confirm the Loop’s working status. 2.1.6.4 In the event BellSouth must dispatch to the end-user’s location more than once due to incorrect or incomplete information provided by Telepak Networks (e.g., incomplete address, incorrect contact name/number, etc.), BellSouth will ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Networks for each additional dispatch required to repair the circuit due to the incorrect/incomplete information provided. BellSouth will assess the applicable Trouble Determination rates from BellSouth’s FCC or state tariffs.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.