Adaptive Management Trigger Decision-Making Processes Clause Samples

Adaptive Management Trigger Decision-Making Processes. Regional San will report to the State Water Board as identified in Adaptive Management Plan Section 1.5. Should an Adaptive Management Trigger occur, Regional San will identify limiting factors and implement appropriate Adaptive Management Actions from the actions delineated in Adaptive Management Plan Section 2.5 or other actions mutually agreed to in writing and in accordance with Contract Section 8.6. Regional San may also identify reasons why Adaptive Management Actions are not reasonable or feasible or may not result in the achievement of Performance Thresholds (e.g., extended drought conditions or infrastructure repairs) and will propose a plan in the Annual Report to meet Performance Thresholds in the next Review Report period. If, after review of the Annual Summary Report or Review Report, along with any other relevant monitoring data, the State Water Board concludes that Project Implementation Actions are occurring and Project Implementation Action metrics are below the associated Adaptive Management Triggers, or the State Water Board concludes it was not feasible to meet Performance Thresholds in the reporting period in question, the State Water Board will confirm this status with Regional San in writing, and Regional San will continue to implement its monitoring plan. If, after review of the Annual Summary Report or Review Report, along with any other relevant monitoring data, the State Water Board concludes that Project Implementation Action metrics are below the associated Adaptive Management Trigger and, if relevant, current Adaptive Management Actions being taken will not be sufficient to achieve Performance Thresholds, the State Water Board will initiate the Meet and Confer process. Through the Meet and Confer Process, the Decision-Making Body will identify the limiting factor(s) to achieving conditions at or above the Adaptive Management Triggers. Should Regional San not meet and confer, the State Water Board will independently investigate the limiting factor(s). Through the Meet and Confer Process or the State Water Board’s independent investigation: 1. If the Decision-Making Body determines that an Adaptive Management Trigger has occurred and that Adaptive Management Actions are warranted, the Decision-Making Body will identify limiting factors and recommend reasonable and feasible Adaptive Management Actions from the possible Adaptive Management Actions identified in Adaptive Management Plan Section 2.5 and will also recommend a timelin...
View Source
Adaptive Management Trigger Decision-Making Processes. Should a Project Implementation Action Adaptive Management Trigger occur, the Program will identify limiting factors and implement any appropriate Adaptive Management Actions from the potential actions delineated in Section 2.1.5. Should a Benefit Implementation Action Adaptive Management Trigger occur, the Program will identify limiting factors and implement any appropriate Adaptive Management Actions from the potential actions delineated in Sections 3.1.6, 3.2.6, 3.3.6, 3.4.6, 3.5.6 and 3.
View Source

Related to Adaptive Management Trigger Decision-Making Processes

  • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 5.1 The Employee agrees to participate in the performance management system that the Employer adopted for the employees of the Employer; 5.2 The Employee accepts that the purpose of the performance management system will be to provide a comprehensive system with specific performance standards to assist the employees and service providers to perform to the standards required; 5.3 The Employer must consult the Employee about the specific performance standards and targets that will be included in the performance management system applicable to the Employee; 5.4 The Employee undertakes to actively focus on the promotion and implementation of the key performance indicators (including special projects relevant to the employee’s responsibilities) within the local government framework; 5.5 The criteria upon which the performance of the Employee shall be assessed shall consist of two components, Operational Performance and Competencies both of which shall be contained in the Performance Agreement; 5.6 The Employee’s assessment will be based on his performance in terms of the outputs/outcomes (performance indicators) identified as per attached Performance Plan, which are linked to the KPAs, and will constitute 80% of the overall assessment result as per the weightings agreed to between the Employer and Employee; 5.7 The Competencies will make up the other 20% of the Employee’s assessment score. The Competencies are spilt into two groups, leading competencies (indicated in blue on the graph below) that drive strategic intent and direction and core competencies (indicated in green on the graph below), which drive the execution of the leading competencies. Strategic direc on and leadership People management Program and project management Financial management Change leadership Governance leadersip Moral competence Planning and organising Analysis and innova on Knowledge and informa on management Communica on Results and quality focus

  • Project Management Plan Developer is responsible for all quality assurance and quality control activities necessary to manage the Work, including the Utility Adjustment Work. Developer shall undertake all aspects of quality assurance and quality control for the Project and Work in accordance with the approved Project Management Plan and

  • Construction Management Plan Contractor shall prepare and furnish to the Owner a thorough and complete plan for the management of the Project from issuance of the Proceed Order through the issuance of the Design Professional's Certificate of Material Completion. Such plan shall include, without limitation, an estimate of the manpower requirements for each trade and the anticipated availability of such manpower, a schedule prepared using the critical path method that will amplify and support the schedule required in Article 2.1.5 below, and the Submittal Schedule as required in Article 2.2.3. The Contractor shall include in his plan the names and resumés of the Project Superintendent, Project Manager and the person in charge of Safety.

  • Configuration Management The Contractor shall maintain a configuration management program, which shall provide for the administrative and functional systems necessary for configuration identification, control, status accounting and reporting, to ensure configuration identity with the UCEU and associated cables produced by the Contractor. The Contractor shall maintain a Contractor approved Configuration Management Plan that complies with ANSI/EIA-649 2011. Notwithstanding ANSI/EIA-649 2011, the Contractor’s configuration management program shall comply with the VLS Configuration Management Plans, TL130-AD-PLN-010-VLS, and shall comply with the following:

  • Program Management 1.1.01 Implement and operate an Immunization Program as a Responsible Entity 1.1.02 Identify at least one individual to act as the program contact in the following areas: 1. Immunization Program Manager;