Air Quality Monitoring Sample Clauses

Air Quality Monitoring. The purpose of air-quality monitoring pursuant to this Agreement is to maintain compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) increment ceilings established under Section 109 and Section 163 respectively, of the Clean Air Act. The Parties agree that the preferred approach for achieving this goal is through the implementation of appropriate monitoring and management response actions in conjunction with SNWA’s groundwater development. An air quality monitoring station shall be located within the Utah portion of the Tier I Monitoring Area at a site deemed representative of the Snake Valley airshed. Data from this station will be used to substantiate potential air quality impacts local to proposed groundwater withdrawals. In addition, the data from this monitor will be used, in conjunction with data collected from existing air quality stations along the Wasatch Front, to substantiate potential regional transport of pollutants generated local to proposed groundwater withdrawals. The air quality monitoring equipment deployed at the site should be capable of sampling particulate matter smaller than 10 micrometers in aerodynamic diameter (PM10) and verifying compliance with the NAAQS and PSD increment ceilings for this air pollutant. Meteorological monitoring equipment will also be deployed at the site to provide data to support the air quality measurements. The monitoring equipment will collect air quality and meteorological data on a continuous basis. The cost of equipment and installation, in addition to the on-going maintenance, data collection and reporting, shall be borne by the SNWA. SNWA shall perform, or fund a mutually agreed upon third party to perform, the installation, maintenance and reporting. The Utah Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) will be able to provide monitoring recommendations and expertise to support data collection and interpretation.

Air Quality Monitoring. (i) Operator shall establish and maintain a system approved by Agreement Administrator to monitor air quality on a monthly basis in the vicinity of DMH for the duration of the Term; (ii) Operator will hire an unbiased industry consultant with relevant expertise to review and evaluate current air quality at the Site including but not limited to implementing air quality tracking, analysis, and reporting, as approved by Agreement Administrator; and (iii) all expenses associated with such monitoring system are to be borne by the Operator. The Operator shall deliver monthly readings to the City Council as outlined in Exhibit G with a copy to Agreement Administrator at the following addresses: (1) to the City Council at New York City Council, City Hall, New York, NY 10007, Attn.: Chief of Staff; (2) to Agreement Administrator at NYCEDC, ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, Attn.: Senior Director of Aviation.

Air Quality Monitoring. 3.1.1 In accordance with the Project Specific EM&A Manual, impact 1-hour Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) monitoring was conducted for at least three times every 6 days, while impact 24-hour TSP monitoring was carried out for at least once every 6 days at the 4 monitoring stations (AMS2, AMS3B, AMS6 and AMS7). 3.1.2 The monitoring locations for impact air quality monitoring are depicted in Figure 2. However, for AMS6 (Dragonair/CNAC (Group) Building), permission on setting up and carrying out impact monitoring works was sought, however, access to the premise has not been granted yet on this report issuing date. 3.1.3 The weather was mostly sunny, with occasional cloudy and occasional rainy in the reporting quarter. The major dust source in the reporting quarter included construction activities from the Project, as well as nearby traffic emissions. 3.1.4 The number of monitoring events and exceedances recorded in each month of the reporting quarter are presented in Table 3.1 and Table 3.2 respectively. June 14 July 14 August 14 1-hr TSP AMS2 15 18 15 AMS3B 15 18 15 AMS7 15 18 15 24-hr TSP AMS2 5 6 5 AMS7 5 6 5 June 14 July 14 August 14 1-hr TSP AMS2 Action 0 0 0 Limit 0 0 0 AMS3B Action 0 0 0 Limit 0 0 0 AMS7 Action 0 0 0 Limit 0 0 0 AMS3B Action 0 0 0 AMS7 Action 0 0 0 3.1.5 All 1-Hour TSP and 24Hr TSP results were below the Action and Limit Level in the reporting month. 3.1.6 The event action plan is annexed in Appendix K. 3.1.7 Meteorological information collected from the wind station during the monitoring periods on the monitoring dates, as shown in Figure 2, including wind speed and wind direction, is annexed in Appendix H of monthly EM&A report June, July and August 2014 respectively.

Air Quality Monitoring. In accordance with Section 2.02(a)(xi), Operator, at its own expense, will hire an unbiased industry consultant with relevant expertise to review and evaluate current air quality at the site including but not limited to implementing air quality tracking, analysis, and reporting, as approved by Agreement Administrator.

Air Quality Monitoring. Upgrading and maintaining air quality monitoring equipment in the locality of the development ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ REGULATORY SERVICES CT0050 - - - - - A200295 ES1218 - Code to be closed at year end Enfield Energy Centre Ltd Brancroft Way, Brimsdown EL/93/0001 Construction of a combined cycle gas turbine electricity generating station. 16.02.▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ 40,000.00 Within 12 yrs of payment 01.05.12 Street Lighting ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ T&T CT0049 - - - - - - Complete Enfield Energy Centre Ltd Brancroft Way, Brimsdown EL/93/0001 Construction of a combined cycle gas turbine electricity generating station. 16.02.▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ 240,000.00 Within 12 yrs of payment 01.05.12 Economic Regeneration ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ BED TBC - - - - - - Complete Enfield Energy Centre Ltd Brancroft Way, Brimsdown EL/93/0001 Construction of a combined cycle gas turbine electricity generating station. 16.02.▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ 180,000.00 Within 12 yrs of payment 01.

Air Quality Monitoring. Construction shall not cause air quality levels to exceed 100 ppb for nitrogen oxides (NO2) over a one (1) hour period and 50 μg/m3 for particulate matter smaller than or equal to 10 microns (PM10) and 2.5 microns (PM2.5) in size over a five (5) hour period (collectively, the “Threshold Levels”). If a Threshold Level is exceeded, then the LACMTA and the Contractor shall immediately stop Construction and promptly implement additional mitigation measures, possibly including reduction of Construction activities, to reduce air quality levels below the Threshold Levels before Construction may resume. DRAFT Alert levels will be set at eighty (80) percent of the Threshold Levels (“Alert Levels”). If an Alert Level is exceeded, then the LACMTA and the Contractor shall promptly implement additional mitigation measures to prevent an exceedance of the Threshold Levels. The LACMTA shall identify at least three locations (one upwind and two downwind) at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Hills High School where the LACMTA will place monitors to verify compliance with such air quality levels. Separate monitors will be used for PM10, PM2.5 and NO2. The monitors shall be positioned to monitor the Project’s contribution to ambient PM2.5, PM10, and NO2, and in secure locations with access to power and limited public access. The monitors will meet the requirements set forth by the federal Environmental Protection Agency and SCAQMD. Monitoring shall be continuous during all Construction activities in Century City. An anemometer shall also be used to measure wind speeds and directions. Monitoring data shall be made available to the Independent Compliance Monitor, the City, the LACMTA, and the Contractor. Monthly reports shall also be provided to the City and made available to interested persons. The Compliance Monitor shall provide immediate notification (via visual alarm and email notification) to the LACMTA, the Contractor, and the Independent Compliance Monitor when the Alert Levels or Threshold Levels are exceeded. The LACMTA shall also comply with the air quality requirements established under Article

Air Quality Monitoring. The RI directly reflects the objective of the proposed interventions; compliance with the air quality acquis. The indicator is clear, measurable and reflects the result and specific objectives and is in accord with the proposed actions. Measuring achievement will be based on the data collection and reporting methodology established and required under community legislation. MSs are required to report air quality data annually to the EC. The data are also required to be made publicly available. In order to ensure compliance with the air quality acquis additional investment is required fir monitoring and reporting – particulate matter and heavy metals. The indicator is a simple assessment of the current baseline where the air quality monitoring and reporting network does not entirely meet the required standards and the target of meeting those standards. Validation of the result will be in the data collection and reporting. The RI is entirely relevant and reflects the objective of the proposed interventions; reducing the number of historically contaminated sites. It is clear, measurable and reflects the results and specific objectives and accord with the proposed actions. The baseline and target values derive from The National Strategy and National Action Plan for the management of contaminated sites. A total of 1393 contaminated sites have been identified from which investigations to date have revealed that 210 have historical contamination. The baseline is the number of polluted sites that have been identified as historically contaminated. The expectation is that 8 sites will be decontaminated under the LIOP and a further 2 sites will be decontaminated through other non – ESIF interventions. Validation of the result will be enabled by the physical evidence. The table below provides a synthesis of the analysis covering Priority Axis 4 result indicators: Code Indicator Relevance Clarity Robustness Statistically validated

Air Quality Monitoring. 3.1.1 In accordance with the Project Specific EM&A Manual, impact 1-hour Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) monitoring was conducted for at least three times every 6 days, while impact 24-hour TSP monitoring was carried out for at least once every 6 days at the 4 monitoring stations (AMS2, AMS3A, AMS6 and AMS7). 3.1.2 The monitoring locations for impact air quality monitoring are depicted in Figure 2. However, for AMS6 (Dragonair/CNAC (Group) Building), permission on setting up and carrying out impact monitoring works was sought, however, access to the premise has not been granted yet on this report issuing date. 3.1.3 The weather was mostly sunny, with occasional cloudy and occasional rainy in the reporting quarter. The major dust source in the reporting quarter included construction activities from the Project, as well as nearby traffic emissions. 3.1.4 The number of monitoring events and exceedances recorded in each month of the reporting quarter are presented in Table 3.1 and Table 3.2 respectively. Dec 12 Jan 13 Feb 13 1-hr TSP AMS2 18 15 15 AMS7 18 15 15 24-hr TSP AMS2 6 5 5 3.1.5 All impact 1-hour TSP monitoring results at all monitoring locations were below the Action and Limit Levels in the reporting quarter. 3.1.6 However, one (1) Action Level and Two (2) Limit Level exceedance of 24-hour TSP results were recorded at monitoring location AMS3A in the reporting quarter. Investigation results show that both the Action and Limit Level exceedance of 24-hour TSP results were not project-related. 3.1.7 One (1) 24-hour TSP result exceeded the Limit Level on 13 Dec 2012 at monitoring station AMS3A in the reporting quarter. 3.1.7.1 According to information provided by the Contractor and on-site observations, installing sand bags and stitching geotextile were the major land-based construction activity being undertaken at Works Area WA2 during the monitoring period. 3.1.7.2 Similar construction activities were carried out on 12 &13 Dec 2012 and 18 & 19 Dec 12 but no exceedance was recorded on 18 & 19 Dec 12. 3.1.7.3 Functional checking on HVS at AMS3A was done. Air flow of the HVS was checked and the flow was steady during the 24-hr TSP sampling at AMS3A. The filter paper was re-weighted by the assigned HOKLAS laboratory and the result was reconfirmed. 3.1.7.4 Construction activities, like sheet piling and percussive piling, were carrying out by nearby private development project during the course of monitoring, which are close to the monitoring station AMS3...

Air Quality Monitoring. Upgrading and maintaining air quality monitoring equipment in the locality of the development ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ REGULATORY SERVICES CT0048 - - - - - A200306 - Air Monitoring Allocated to A200306/A200235. Complete. Code to be closed at year end Enfield Energy Centre Ltd Brancroft Way, Brimsdown EL/93/0001 Construction of a combined cycle gas turbine electricity generating station. 16.02.97 Enfield Highway Enfield North Within 12 yrs of payment 01.