Monitoring Stations Clause Samples

Monitoring Stations. Water quality data is collected via water samples at river and stream monitoring stations. The list below shows monitoring stations within the relevant WRIAs (i.e., that contain Enrolled Lands). However, not all of the monitoring stations listed below are actually on the Enrolled Lands.

Monitoring Stations. KJUC will operate and maintain the equipment discussed in the Monitoring Stations section above.

Monitoring Stations. Monitoring stations will be put in place to measure the amount of water corning into the ditches and the amount of water going into the streams below the diversions on a continuous real­ time basis. KIUC, assuming that it receives the understandings called for in the Permits and Approvals section of this agreement, will install and maintain monitoring equipment at the existing flow gauging location immediately above the Puu Lua Reservoir and for the following streams: Waiakoali Kawaikoi Kauaikinana Kokee ADC (either itself or through its licensee KAA), if the Commission approves this agreement, will install and maintain monitoring equipment for the following streams: Waiahulu Koaie Waimea at the Mauka hydroelectric plant The information gathered by these stations shall be made available to all parties at the same The Commission and the U.S. Geological Survey may install and maintain its own monitoring equipment along the streams and/or ditches in the watershed. If the KIUC project does not receive the understandings called for in the Permits and Approvals section, the monitoring equipment will be installed and maintained by ADC (either itself or through its licensee KAA). If the KIUC project ultimately does not proceed, ADC (either itselfor through its licensee KAA) will assume responsibility for the monitoring equipment.'

Monitoring Stations monoxide was achieved (no readings greater than the standard more than once per year) in l997. The standards for ozone have been exceeded every year since the standard was adopted. Now there are two new standards fine particulate matter and ozone-8-hour. Those standards may be exceeded in some parts of the state — the location and extent of these possible violations will be determined over the next 2-S years. In the effort to clean up the air, the easiest portion of the job is already done. As the remaining portion of emissions are controlled, the expense per ton of pollutant controlled will increase, but the goal of clean air will be a little closer. It creates four million tons of unecessary waste It fills 3% of American landfills The average person receives 700 pieces of it or unsolicted mail each year 44% of it is thrown in the trash, unopened and unread by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ The Water Quality Financing Administration is announcing a reduction in the cost of borrowing from the Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund (WQRLF) effective July l, l998. The interest rate being offered to all borrowers has been reduced from 60% of the Bond Buyer Revenue Bond Index to 45%. For loans closing in July, the interest rate is just 2.4% for a term not to exceed 20 years. The only fees charged to RLF borrowers are a $S,000 out of pocket origination fee and an administrative fee equal to 5% of total debt service which is annual- ized over the life of the loan. The origination and administrative fee add 0.50% to the cost of the loan for a True Interest Cost of borrowing of only 2.9%. This new rate will apply only to Water Quality RLF. The Drinking Water RLF interest rates will remain unchanged at 60% of the Revenue Index. This is tremendous news for WQRLF borrowers who can achieve significant savings over more traditional financ- ing mechanisms. For an "AAA” rated issuer, the debt service savings on borrowing from the WQRLF exceeds $2.S million over a typical €eneral Obligation bond issue on a $l0 million loan for a term of 20 years. "AA” jurisdictions can achieve even higher savings of approximately $2.5 million. This rate reduction is part of an overall Revolving Loan Fund en- hancement program that includes many streamlined administrative and engineering requirements. For example, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Wage rates, costs of issuance, and pre-approval of A/E agreements and change orders have been eliminated. For informa- tion on the Water Quality or Drinking Water Revolving Loan Funds, con...

Monitoring Stations. The monitoring station locations have been established to identify potential impacts to water quality sensitive receivers which are shown in Figure 5. 1. Prior to, during and after the dredging and sandfilling works, water quality sampling will be undertaken at stations situated around the dredging area and at the sensitive receivers. The monitoring at those stations is to ensure the dredging and sandfilling works of the Project will not cause deterioration in water quality outside the impact (mixing) zone, in particularly at the nearby sensitive areas (shown in Figure 5.1). • R1 is a Reference Station located to the south of the dredging/sandfilling area, which is not supposed to be impacted by the dredging/sandfilling wo rks. R1 is a representative station for the background water quality for Tolo Harbour as it is at the channel where the water exchange between the enclosed Plover Cove and Tolo Harbour take place; • R2 is a Reference Station located to the southwest of the dredging/sandfilling area, which is not supposed to be impacted by the dredging/sandfilling works. R2 is a representative station for the background water quality in the Plover Cove region; • I1, I2 and I3 are the Impact Stations just outside the mixing zo ne, which is unlikely to be impacted by the dredging/sandfilling works; • FCZ1 represents the Sensitive Receiver located at the ▇▇▇ Tin ▇▇▇▇ East Fish Culture Zone, which is about 1.5 km to the southwest of the dredging/sandfilling area. Deterioration of water quality at this station is not anticipated; • M1 represents the Sensitive Receiver located at the ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ SSSI, which is about 800 m to the west of the dredging/sandfilling area. Deterioration of water quality at this station is not anticipated; • W1 represents the Sensitive Receiver located at the Water Sport Centre, which is about 250 m to the southeast of the dredging/sandfilling area, which is unlikely to be impacted by the dredging/sandfilling works. • G1 is the Gradient Station to assist in the identification of the source of any impact. 1. The monitoring stations will be sampled during Baseline Monitoring (prior to the dredging works), Impact Monitoring (during dredging and sandfilling works) and Post Construction Monitoring (after completion of sandfilling work).

Monitoring Stations. 5.3.1.1 The proposed water quality monitoring stations are listed in Table 5.1 and shown in Figure 5.1. The monitoring stations proposed in this section are indicative subject to further review before commencement of the water quality monitoring works. The status and locations of water quality monitoring stations and the works activities may change after issuing this Manual. For such occasion, the ET Leader shall propose with justification for changes to monitoring locations or other requirements of the EM&A programme, taking into account the following considerations and seek approval from the IEC and EPD: a) at locations close to and preferably at the boundary of the mixing zone of the major site activities as indicated in the EIA Report, which are likely to have water quality impacts; b) close to the sensitive receivers which are directly or likely to be affected; c) for monitoring locations located in the vicinity of the sensitive receivers, care shall be taken to cause minimal disturbance during monitoring; and d) two or more control stations which shall be at locations representative of the project site in its undisturbed condition. Control stations shall be located, as far as is practicable, both upstream and downstream of the works area. Table 5.1 Proposed Marine Water Quality Stations for Baseline and Impact Monitoring Monitoring Station ID in EIA Report Description Easting Northing