Audits and Evaluations Clause Samples

The "Audits and Evaluations" clause grants one party the right to review and assess the records, operations, or performance of the other party to ensure compliance with contractual obligations or regulatory requirements. Typically, this clause outlines the scope of permissible audits, the notice period required before an audit, and the types of records or processes that may be examined, such as financial documents or data security practices. Its core practical function is to provide transparency and accountability, helping to identify and address any discrepancies or non-compliance issues early in the contractual relationship.
Audits and Evaluations. 5.1 The Service Manager shall prepare and maintain accurate and complete books, records and accounts for payments made in connection with the administration of the Programs. The Service Manager shall make or cause to be made available to the representatives, designates, agents or independent auditors of the Minister, all documents, books, records and accounts pertaining to the administration of the Programs, for the purpose of conducting such financial audits and program evaluations as the Minister may require. The Minister shall keep all personal information confidential and shall not disclose any personal information to third parties, except in accordance with the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.31, and shall use such personal information only for the purposes stated herein. Such financial audits and program evaluations shall take place during ordinary business hours.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Audits and Evaluations. 1. UNESCO shall have the right, at its own expense, to have the Partner’s books and records pertaining to the project bank account and project execution reviewed (and, if desired, copied) upon prior written notice at any reasonable time agreeable to the Partner by the UNESCO’s Internal/External Auditor, auditors as UNESCO may appoint or the partner’s own auditor. 2. UNESCO may conduct, or arrange for, a periodic evaluation of the Partner’s implementation of the [project] [activity]. To this end, the Partner will, upon UNESCO’s request, enable representatives or designees of UNESCO to visit the project site(s) and facilities, inspect property and review books and records related to the project.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Audits and Evaluations. 25 7.15 TANGIBLE NET WORTH........................................25 7.16 LIABILITIES TO TANGIBLE NET WORTH.........................25 7.17 EARNINGS..................................................25
View Source
Audits and Evaluations. KPMG Peat Marwick or such other accountant engaged by the Borrower to prepare its financial statements shall conduct a quarterly review and evaluation, at Borrower's expense, in form acceptable to Lender in its sole discretion, of Borrower's books and records, with respect to the Rights to Receive, and shall provide the results of such review and evaluation to Lender together with the financial statements required by Sections 7.8(a) and 7.8(b).
View Source
Audits and Evaluations. From the Effective Date until six (6) years following the end of the Project Term, the Minister or the Auditor General of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ attend the operations of the Eligible Applicant for the purpose of conducting an audit or evaluation of the Project, the Eligible Applicant’s compliance with this Agreement, or the Program. The Eligible Applicant agrees to make available to the Minister all records, books of account, income tax returns, information, databases, invoices, and audit and evaluation reports that are necessary for these purposes. If the Eligible Applicant fails to provide such access or any required
View Source
Audits and Evaluations. Upon request, Provider shall provide to Regence Patient Identifying Information that Regence deems reasonably necessary to perform evaluations, audits and health care operations, including, but not limited to, utilization review, quality assessment and improvement activities (such as collection of HEDIS data), and reviewing qualifications of health care providers. For purposes of any such request, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ agrees that it will:
View Source
Audits and Evaluations 
View SourceView Similar (7)

Related to Audits and Evaluations

  • AUDITS AND INVESTIGATIONS 27.1 Each invoice paid by UNDP shall be subject to a post-payment audit by auditors, whether internal or external, of UNDP or by other authorized and qualified agents of UNDP at any time during the term of the Contract and for a period of three (3) years following the expiration or prior termination of the Contract. 27.2 UNDP may conduct investigations relating to any aspect of the Contract or the award thereof, the obligations performed under the Contract, and the operations of the Contractor generally relating to performance of the Contract at any time during the term of the Contract and for a period of three 27.3 The Contractor shall provide its full and timely cooperation with any such inspections, post- payment audits or investigations. Such cooperation shall include, but shall not be limited to, the Contractor’s obligation to make available its personnel and any relevant documentation for such purposes at reasonable times and on reasonable conditions and to grant to UNDP access to the Contractor’s premises at reasonable times and on reasonable conditions in connection with such access to the Contractor’s personnel and relevant documentation. The Contractor shall require its agents, including, but not limited to, the Contractor’s attorneys, accountants or other advisers, to reasonably cooperate with any inspections, post-payment audits or investigations carried out by UNDP hereunder. 27.4 UNDP shall be entitled to a refund from the Contractor for any amounts shown by such audits or investigations to have been paid by UNDP other than in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract. The Contractor also agrees that, where applicable, donors to UNDP whose funding is the source of, in whole or in part, the funding for the procurement of Goods and/or Services which are the subject of this Contract, shall have direct recourse to the Contractor for the recovery of any funds determined by UNDP to have been used in violation of or inconsistent with this Contract.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATIONS 6.1 Administrators will meet with new employees to discuss their job description within one (1) month of hire. The Administrator and new employee will sign off on the job description and it will be forwarded to the Human Resources Department for inclusion in the employee‘s personnel file. The Human Resources Department will compile and distribute a list showing each employee‘s evaluator prior to November 1st of each year. Bargaining unit job descriptions will be made available via the District‘s web site. 6.2 Evaluations will transpire as follows for employees that are receiving satisfactory ratings: a. New hires—regular part-time (school year employees) will be evaluated at three (3) and six (6) working months. b. New hires—full time (12 month employees) will be evaluated at three (3), six (6) and twelve (12) months. c. After the initial year of employment, each employee shall be evaluated at least once annually by March 31st. 6.3 Criteria for evaluating bargaining unit members will be based on the performance categories outlined on the evaluation form as related to the job description of their specific position assignment. 6.4 Evaluation reports shall include feedback regarding strengths and weaknesses (if any) demonstrated by the employee. Prior to an employee receiving a rating less than “Meets Expectations,” the employee shall be advised of the performance concern and provided with a clear statement of any deficiency and a statement defining acceptable performance. This shall occur within a reasonable time prior to the final evaluation to allow the employee a chance to demonstrate improvement. 6.5 In the event an employee is evaluated overall as “Does Not Meet Expectations,” the district, in consultation with the employee and the Association, will provide the employee a written plan of improvement (See Employee Plan of Improvement form in Appendix). The plan shall clearly define all areas of deficiency, provide clear and attainable performance goals, and outline supports (if any) to be given, including any necessary training at the District’s expense. The employee will be given a reasonable amount of time, not to exceed sixty (60) working days, to meet job performance expectations. During the improvement period, feedback will be provided through a minimum of three scheduled meetings. Following the completion of the plan, the supervisor shall notify the employee in writing of the outcome. Failure to demonstrate satisfactory improvement may constitute grounds for termination. 6.6 The bargaining unit member shall be given a copy of their evaluation, and any data collection sheets (with the submitters name excluded) used in the evaluation. 6.7 Under the law there is no right to Association Representation at evaluation conferences. 6.8 Any information shared with the evaluating administrator for the evaluation process shall be recorded on Data Collection Sheet(s), with the exception of those unit members that have supervising teachers. Supervising teachers will work directly with the evaluating administrator to share performance information for inclusion in the unit member‘s evaluation. 6.9 Employees shall have the right to respond to evaluations in writing. Such written response shall be attached to the evaluation if received within 5 days. 6.10 No bargaining unit member shall be required to sign a blank or incomplete evaluation form.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?