Clarification of Proposals Clause Samples

Clarification of Proposals. To assist in the examination, evaluation and comparison of Proposals, UNDP may, at its discretion, ask any Proposer for a clarification of its Proposal. UNDP’s request for clarification and the response shall be in writing. Notwithstanding the written communication, no change in the prices or substance of the Proposal shall be sought, offered, or permitted, except to provide clarification, and confirm the correction of any arithmetic errors discovered by UNDP in the evaluation of the Proposals, in accordance with RFP Clause 32. Any unsolicited clarification submitted by a Proposer in respect to its Proposal, which is not a response to a request by UNDP, shall not be considered during the review and evaluation of the Proposals.

Clarification of Proposals. To assist in the examination, evaluation and comparison of Proposals, the Purchaser may at its discretion, ask the Offeror for clarification of its Proposal. The request for clarification and the response shall be in writing and no change in price or substance of the Proposal shall be sought, offered or permitted.

Clarification of Proposals. UNAIDS may, at its discretion, ask any bidder for clarification of any part of its proposal to assist in the examination, evaluation and comparison of proposals. The request for clarification and the response shall be in writing. No change in price or substance of the proposal shall be sought, offered or permitted during this exchange.

Clarification of Proposals. WHO may, at its discretion, ask any bidder for clarification of any part of its proposal. The request for clarification and the response shall be in writing. No change in price or substance of the proposal shall be sought, offered or permitted during this exchange.

Clarification of Proposals. The con- tracting committee may elect not to hold any clarifying discussions and rec- ommend awarding the contract to the low responsive bidder. Otherwise, the contracting committee must give at least each of the three apparent lowest evaluated bidders an equal opportunity to participate in discussions for the purpose of resolving questions regard- ing the specification and contract terms and to arrive at a final price. Neither prices of other bids nor rel- ative ranking of any bidder are to be revealed under any circumstances. Such discussions may be held by tele- phone or similar means provided at least each of the three apparent lowest evaluated bidders have an equal oppor- tunity to participate. Upon completion of the clarifying discussions, the con- tracting committee will determine the lowest evaluated responsive bid. If no bids are responsive after the con- tracting committee has completed clarifying discussions, no contract award can be made under the informal bidding procedure.

Clarification of Proposals. To assist in the examination, evaluation and comparison of Proposals, UNDP may at its discretion, ask the Bidder for clarification of its Proposal. The request for clarification and the response shall be in writing and no change in price or substance of the Proposal shall be sought, offered or permitted. UNDP will examine the Proposals to determine whether they are complete, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the Proposals are generally in order. Prior to the detailed evaluation, UNDP will determine the substantial responsiveness of each Proposal to the Request for Proposals (RFP). For purposes of these Clauses, a substantially responsive Proposal is one, which conforms to all the terms and conditions of the RFP without material deviations. UNDP’s determination of a Proposal’s responsiveness is based on the contents of the Proposal itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. In order to assess financial strengths of the Proposers UNDP will check Financial Statements of the Proposers. The liquidity ratio (please see the formula in the Annex III-B) shall be equal or more than 1 for the analyzed periods. A Proposal determined as not substantially responsive will be rejected by UNDP and may not subsequently be made responsive by the Bidder by correction of the non-conformity. A two-stage procedure is utilised in evaluating the proposals, with evaluation of the technical proposal being completed prior to any price proposal being opened and compared. The price Schedules of the Proposals will be opened only for submissions that passed minimum technical score of 70% (490 points) of the maximum obtainable 700 points. The evaluation will be conducted in accordance with the cumulative analysis method, according to which the technical and financial proposals have pre-assigned weights and pre-assigned maximum number of scores: technical proposal -70%, 700 points maximum, financial proposal 30%, 300 points maximum. The winning proposal will be the one with the highest sum of points obtained both for finance and technical evaluation. EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR EVENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES Max. obtainable points Company / Other Entity A B C D E A. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Clarification of Proposals. To assist in the examination, evaluation and comparison of Proposals, UNDP may, at its discretion, ask the Offeror for clarification of its Proposal. The request for clarification and the response shall be in writing and no change in price or substance of the Proposal shall be sought, offered or permitted.

Clarification of Proposals. ‌ While evaluating Proposals, NERA may request additional information about any item in the Proposal. All requests will be made in writing, and the Bidder will be required to respond to the request by the deadline provided with such request or NERA may choose to stop evaluating the Bidder’s Proposal.

Clarification of Proposals. The City reserves the right to obtain clarification of any point in regards to a proposal or to obtain additional information necessary to properly evaluate or particular proposal. Failure of a Proposer to respond to such a request for additional information or clarification could result in rejection of their proposal.