Current and Forecasted Traffic Clause Samples

The "Current and Forecasted Traffic" clause defines the requirements for reporting and analyzing both present and anticipated levels of data, user, or network traffic relevant to the agreement. Typically, this clause obligates one or both parties to provide accurate information about current usage statistics and to project future traffic volumes over a specified period. This information may be used to plan for capacity, allocate resources, or determine pricing adjustments. The core function of this clause is to ensure that both parties have a clear understanding of usage patterns, enabling better operational planning and reducing the risk of service disruptions or unexpected costs.
Current and Forecasted Traffic. The District 4 Office of Planning developed the traffic forecasts for the 2062 design year on December 4, 2018. The 2022 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on SR 87 from PM 0.0 to PM 6.1 is 208,700 vehicles. The ADT is expected to increase to a projected demand of 268,400 vehicles by 2062. Also, the 2020 percentage of trucks (% trucks) is 2.39%, and it is expected to remain at 2.39% in 2062. Table 4-5 shows the current and forecasted traffic information on SR 87 from PM 0.0 to PM 6.1 for design years 2018, 2022, 2032, 2042, and 2062. ADT 202,800 208,700 223,600 238,500 268,400 DHV — — — 18,400 — % Trucks 2.39 2.39 2.39 2.39 2.39 Median lanes TI — — 9.50 10.00 11.00 Median lanes ESAL — — 1,342,000 2,775,000 5,920,000 Two right lanes TI — — 11.00 12.00 13.00 Two right lanes ESAL — — 5,366,000 11,100,000 23,683,000 Notes: — = not applicable ADT = Average Daily Traffic DHV = Design Hourly Volume ESAL = Equivalent Single Axle Load PM = post mile(s) SR = State Route TI = Traffic Index The District 4 Office of Traffic Safety provided the accident data and analysis on July 22, 2020. A total of 1,048 accidents, with one fatal accident, occurred within the project limits (SR 87 from PM 0.0 to PM 6.1) during the most-recent available 3-year period (October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2019). The actual fatal accident rate is lower than the average fatal accident rate for similar facilities statewide. The fatal accident occurred on the southbound (SB) SR 87 off-ramp to Almaden Expressway on June 16, 2019, at 06:48 hours. Vehicle one (V1) was traveling at 80 miles per hour. Due to an unsafe speed, person 1 (P1) was unable to successfully negotiate the westerly curve in the roadway. This failure allowed the left rear of V1 to collide with a pile of dirt on the east side of the roadway. V1 then lost control and rotated in a counterclockwise direction, causing V1 to leave the west side of the roadway. V1 then collided with the sound wall on the west side of the roadway two times. The force by which V1 collided with the sound wall, caused V1 to overturn three times, colliding with the dirt embankment on the west side of the roadway each time. P1 sustained fatal injuries as a result of this collision. P1 caused the collision by traveling at an unsafe speed for then-current weather/traffic conditions. Table 4-6 compares the actual accident rates within the project limits with the average accident rates for similar facilities statewide during the study period. 1 340 707 1,048 0.001 0.3...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Current and Forecasted Traffic. ‌ The future travel forecasting was based on the assumption that the project location is a rural setting and planned land use in the area growth rate of 2.48% was used for forecasting purposes. Construction Year ADT (2024) 20,500 10,400 Future ADT (2044) 33,500 17,000 Future Year ADT (2064) 54,500 28000 DHV (2044) 2,850 1500 DHV (2064) 4,650 2,400 T (%) (2044, 2064) 6% 5% D (%) (2044, 2064) 60% 100% 20 Year ESAL (2044) 10,120,000 8,320,000 20 Year TI (2044) 12 11.5 40 Year ESAL (2064) 28,150,000 23,210,000 40 Year TI (2064) 13.5 13
View SourceView Similar (2)
Current and Forecasted Traffic. The current and forecasted traffic information for the project limits is shown below by segment. Ala-80 from PM R7.6 to CC-80 at Cutting Boulevard (PM 2.0): • Count Year (2020) average Daily • Construction Year (2022) ADT 238,200 • Design Year (2042) ADT 247,400 • Truck% 4.81% • 20-year Traffic Index (TI) 14.00 • 20-year Equivalent Single Axle Load (ESAL) 50,547,000 CC-80 from Cutting Boulevard (PM 2.0) to Hilltop Drive (PM 6.0): • Count Year (2020) ADT 258,600 • Construction Year (2022) ADT 260,100 • Design Year (2042) ADT 275,000 • Truck% 4.00% • 20-year TI 13.50 • 20-year ESAL) 43,862,000 CC-80 from Hilltop Drive (PM 6.0) to State Route (SR) 4 (PM 10.0) • Count Year (2020) ADT 245,000 • Construction Year (2022) ADT 246,500 • Design Year (2042) ADT 260,900 • Truck% 4.60% • 20-year TI 14.00 • 20-year ESAL 59,168,000 CC-80 from SR 4 (PM 10.0) to ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (PM 13.5): • Count Year (2020) ADT 178,700 • Construction Year (2022) ADT 179,700 • Design Year (2042) ADT 189,900 • Truck% 4.37% 5.18% • 20-year TI 14.00 • 20-year ESAL 47,231,000 As shown in the tables below, the accident information classified as “All” considers all collisions, combining data on collisions that occurred in both the westbound direction and the eastbound direction of the project mainline segments, exclusive of the I-80 ramps, in Alameda County from PM R7.60 to PM 8.036 and in Contra Costa County from PM 0.0 to PM 13.5.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Current and Forecasted Traffic. Table 4-5 lists current and forecasted traffic information for Main Line and Ramps on SR 4 within the project limits. Count Year ADT (2015) 90,800 Construction Year ADT (2026) 102,400 Design Year ADT (2046) 123,500 DHV (2046) 8,600 D% 54.1% Truck% 5.09% Notes: ADT = Average Daily Traffic D% = directional distribution (% of traffic moving in the peak travel direction) DHV = Design Hourly Volume SR = State Route Table 4-6 lists the estimated Traffic Indexes (TIs) and Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESALs) for 20 years and 40 years after the completion of project construction for the mainline.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Current and Forecasted Traffic. Peak hour volumes for both AM and PM and average daily traffic (ADT) volumes for existing conditions and opening year and design year Build Alternative and No Build Alternative within the project limits are summarized in Table 4-2. 2 The TOAR qualitatively analyzed traffic conditions in the event that, due to funding and other constraints, the project opening year is 2026 instead of 2025, and subsequently the project design year is 2046 instead of 2045. See Sections 4.3.3.1 and 4.3.3.2, below. SB I-680: Between Alcosta and I-580 7,702 7,048 107,000 8,365 9,005 119,000 8,425 9,005 119,000 10,085 11,640 151,000 10,260 11,640 151,000 SB I-680: Between I- 580 and Stoneridge 5,080 5,618 81,000 5,900 6,315 89,000 5,950 6,335 89,000 6,795 8,240 112,000 6,995 8,330 112,000 SB I-680: Between Stoneridge and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ 5,099 5,965 76,000 5,535 6,645 84,000 5,585 6,665 84,000 6,310 8,520 105,000 6,510 8,610 105,000 SB I-680: Between Sunol and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 5,530 5,396 77,000 7,045 5,885 83,000 7,070 5,905 83,000 8,025 7,205 100,000 8,140 7,295 100,000 SB I-680: Between ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Calaveras 7,031 5,573 92,000 8,795 6,735 102,000 8,795 6,735 102,000 10,095 8,760 125,000 10,095 8,760 125,000 NB I-680: Between Alcosta and I-580 6,777 6,965 96,000 7,250 7,755 108,000 7,250 7,755 108,000 9,845 9,590 139,000 9,845 9,590 139,000 NB I-680: Between I- 580 and Stoneridge 5,310 6,500 89,000 5,850 7,115 98,000 5,850 7,140 98,000 7,390 8,300 119,000 7,390 8,435 119,000 NB I-680: Between Stoneridge and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ 4,637 4,549 80,000 5,640 5,935 88,000 5,640 5,965 88,000 7,115 6,850 107,000 7,115 7,005 107,000 NB I-680: Between Sunol and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 4,608 4,687 72,000 5,145 5,215 80,000 5,145 5,305 80,000 6,665 6,260 100,000 6,665 6,305 100,000 NB I-680: Between ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Calaveras 4,971 5,650 85,000 5,685 6,750 94,000 5,685 6,750 94,000 7,730 7,955 119,000 7,730 7,955 119,000 Source: ▇▇▇▇ & Peers 2019
View SourceView Similar (2)
Current and Forecasted Traffic. The Design Hourly Volume (DHV) Total and the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is shown below in Table 1. Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) 6,500 7,826 8,190 Design Hour Volume (DHV) 810 933 1,000 Peak Hour Directional Vol % (NB/SB) 47.1/52.9 48.6/51.4 47.7/52.3 Truck Design Hourly Vol % (T) 11 11 11 Traffic Index (TI) 9 10 10.5 Design Speed (NB/SB) (mph) 55/30 55/30 55/30 *Northbound (NB), Southbound (SB), miles per hour (mph) TRUCKS IN ADT: 7.0% 10 YEAR TI: 8.5 DESIGN SPEED (V): 55 / 30 MPH 20 YEAR TI: 9.5 The following Collision Rate Summary Table shown below shows actual and average collision rates within the project location for the three-year period from January 1, 2016 thru December 21, 2018. The ‘actual’ collision rate in this segment is lower than the state ‘average’ for this type of facility. There was 1 reported collision during this three-year period. This collision was a rear end accident near PM 50.5 resulting from an obstruction on the roadway. The data from the 3-year collision history indicate that the nonstandard side slopes did not contribute to any collisions. There is no recognizable or correctable trend when reviewing the 3yr collision history. SB/SLO SR 1 0.00 .31 0.31 0.022 0.51 1.10 * The numbers in the table are units of collisions per million vehicle miles
View SourceView Similar (2)
Current and Forecasted Traffic. The current and forecasted traffic data were obtained from recently conducted traffic counts as well as a Port of Los Angeles/Port of Long Beach traffic model. The existing average daily traffic (ADT) along the intersection of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Boulevard and Fries Avenue north of the existing at-grade rail crossing is approximately 13,440 vehicles per day. South Wilmington Grade Separation 5 January 22, 2007 Project Study Report Equivalent Under current conditions, the at-grade railroad crossing operates at a LOS D during the peak periods when a train is present. Future (2030) traffic volumes have been estimated based on anticipated growth in through-traffic and planned/proposed terminal developments in both Ports. By the year 2030, significant increases in traffic on ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Boulevard and Fries Avenue will also result in LOS F operating conditions at the at-grade rail crossing. Without a railroad grade separation, unit trains accessing the West Basin would continue to cause significant delays to truck and vehicle traffic ingress/egressing West Basin destinations. At-grade railroad crossing (AM) 10,829 B At-grade railroad crossing (PM) 13,440 E At-grade railroad crossing (AM) 18,854 D At-grade railroad crossing (PM) 23,399 F
View Source
Current and Forecasted Traffic. The District 3 Office of Traffic Forecasting and Modeling, provided the project limits' current and forecasted traffic data. See the traffic data shown in the tables below. Highway Post Mile SOL 080 40.7/R44.7 YOL 080 0.00/R11.72 YOL 050 0.00/3.12 SAC 050 0.00/L0.617 SAC 080 M0.00/M1.36 2019 140,000 150,795 149,198 198,012 123,530 2023 148,400 160,411 158,162 208,927 130,838 2029 161,000 174,834 171,608 225,300 141,800 2039 182,000 182,613 178,363 240,800 153,700 2049 203,000 190,391 185,117 256,300 165,600 2069 AADTT 245,000 205,948 198,626 287,300 189,400 2019 9,408 11,731 11,358 13,968 9,203 2023 9,972 12,479 12,043 14,736 9,751 2029 10,819 13,601 13,071 15,889 10,574 2039 12,230 14,205 13,591 16,986 11,465 2049 13,642 14,808 14,111 18,083 12,356 2069 DHV 16,464 16,015 15,151 20,277 14,138 2019 11,100 9,871 10,230 13,844 9,666 2023 11,700 10,679 10,972 14,470 10,388 2029 12,700 11,890 12085 15,410 11,470 2039 14,400 12,347 12,855 16,545 12,350 2049 16,000 12,803 13,625 17,680 13,230 2069 19,400 13,716 15,165 19,950 14,990 Directional % 55.0 53.0 54.0 54.0 67.0 DH Truck % 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 AADT=Average Annual Daily Traffic AADTT=Annual Average Daily Truck Traffic DHV=Design Hourly Volume ESALs & TIs SOL 080 40.7/R44.7 YOL 080 0.00/R11.72 YOL 050 0.00/3.12 Lane 1 Lane 2, 3,4 Lane 1 Lane 2,3 Lane 1 Lane 2, 3,4 2019 406,000 1,625,000 603,700 2,415,000 455,700 1,822,700 2023 430,000 1,722,000 613,800 2,455,000 463,300 1,853,000 2029 467,000 1,868,000 628,900 2,515,600 474,700 1,898,700 10-year 4,671,000 18,687,000 6,289,000 25,155,900 4,746,700 18,986,800 20-year 9,343,000 37,375,000 12,577,900 50,311,800 9,493,400 37,973,500 40-year 18,687,000 74,750,000 25,155,900 100,623,700 18,986,800 75,947,000 2019 8.0 9.5 8.5 10.0 8.0 9.5 2023 8.0 9.5 8.5 10.0 8.0 9.5 2029 8.0 9.5 8.5 10.0 8.0 9.5 10-year 11.0 12.5 11.0 13.0 11.0 13.0 20-year 11.5 14.0 12.0 14.5 12.0 14.0 40-year 12.5 15.0 13.0 15.5 13.0 15.0 2019 6.0 6.5 6.0 2023 6.0 6.5 6.0 2029 6.0 6.5 6.0 8.0 8.5 8.0 10-year 8.5 9.0 8.5 20-year 40-year 9.0 9.0 9.0 ESAL= Equivalent single axle load TI=Traffic Index ESALs & TIs SAC 050 0.00/L0.617 SAC 080 M0.00/M1.36 Lane 1 Lane 2,3,4 Lane 1 Lane 2,3,4 2019 538,700 2,154,600 279,600 1,118,200 2023 554,900 2,219,500 289,200 1,156,900 2029 579,200 2,316,700 303,800 1,215,400 10-year 5,548,900 22,195,400 2,892,300 11,569,300 20-year 11,097,700 44,390,900 5,784,600 23,138,500 40-year 22,195,400 88,781,700 11,569,300 46,277,000 2019 8.5 9.0 7.5 9.0 2023 8.5 9.0 8.0 9.0...
View Source
Current and Forecasted Traffic 
View SourceView Similar (3)

Related to Current and Forecasted Traffic

  • TRUNK FORECASTING 57.1. CLEC shall provide forecasts for traffic utilization over trunk groups. Orders for trunks that exceed forecasted quantities for forecasted locations will be accommodated as facilities and/or equipment are available. Sprint shall make all reasonable efforts and cooperate in good faith to develop alternative solutions to accommodate orders when facilities are not available. Company forecast information must be provided by CLEC to Sprint twice a year. The initial trunk forecast meeting should take place soon after the first implementation meeting. A forecast should be provided at or prior to the first implementation meeting. The semi-annual forecasts shall project trunk gain/loss on a monthly basis for the forecast period, and shall include: 57.1.1. Semi-annual forecasted trunk quantities (which include baseline data that reflect actual Tandem and end office Local Interconnection and meet point trunks and Tandem-subtending Local Interconnection end office equivalent trunk requirements) for no more than two years (current plus one year); 57.1.2. The use of Common Language Location Identifier (CLLI-MSG), which are described in Telcordia documents BR ▇▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ and BR ▇▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇; 57.1.3. Description of major network projects that affect the other Party will be provided in the semi-annual forecasts. Major network projects include but are not limited to trunking or network rearrangements, shifts in anticipated traffic patterns, or other activities by CLEC that are reflected by a significant increase or decrease in trunking demand for the following forecasting period. 57.1.4. Parties shall meet to review and reconcile the forecasts if forecasts vary significantly.

  • Required Vendor Sales Reporting By responding to this Solicitation, you agree to report to TIPS all sales made under any awarded Agreement with TIPS. Vendor is required to report all sales under the TIPS contract to TIPS. If the TIPS Member entity requesting a price from the awarded Vendor requests the TIPS contract, Vendor must include the TIPS Contract number on any communications with the TIPS Member entity. If awarded, you will be provided access to the Vendor Portal. To report sales, login to the TIPS Vendor Portal and click on the PO’s and Payments tab. Pages 3-7 of the Vendor Portal User Guide will walk you through the process of reporting sales to TIPS. Please refer to the TIPS Accounting FAQ’s for more information about reporting sales and if you have further questions, contact the Accounting Team at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇. The Vendor or vendor assigned dealers are responsible for keeping record of all sales that go through the TIPS Agreement and submitting same to TIPS.

  • Year 2000 Compliance Each Party warrants that it has implemented a program the goal of which is to ensure that all software, hardware and related materials (collectively called “Systems”) delivered, connected with BellSouth or supplied in the furtherance of the terms and conditions specified in this Agreement: (i) will record, store, process and display calendar dates falling on or after January 1, 2000, in the same manner, and with the same functionality as such software records, stores, processes and calendar dates falling on or before December 31, 1999; and (ii) shall include without limitation date data century recognition, calculations that accommodate same century and multicentury formulas and date values, and date data interface values that reflect the century.

  • Contractor Sales Reporting Vendor Management Fee Contractor Reports Contract Sales Reporting. Contractor shall report total Contract sales quarterly for this Cooperative Purchasing Agreement to Enterprise Services, as set forth below. Contract Sales Reporting System. Contractor shall report quarterly Contract sales in Enterprise Services’ Contract Sales Reporting System. Enterprise Services shall provide Contractor with a login password and a vendor number. The password and vendor number shall be provided to the Sales Reporting Representative(s) listed on Contractor’s Bidder Profile. Data. Each sales report must identify every authorized Purchaser by name as it is known to Enterprise Services and its total combined sales amount invoiced during the reporting period (i.e., sales of an entire agency or political subdivision, not its individual subsections). The “Miscellaneous” option may be used only with prior approval by Enterprise Services. Upon request, Contractor shall provide contact information for all authorized Purchasers specified herein during the term of the Contract. If there are no Contract sales during the reporting period, Contractor must report zero sales. Due dates for Contract Sales Reporting. Quarterly Contract Sales Reports must be submitted electronically by the following deadlines for all Contract sales invoiced during the applicable calendar quarter: Vendor Management Fee. Contractor shall pay to Enterprise Services a vendor management fee (“VMF”) of 1.25 percent on the purchase price for all Cooperative Purchasing Agreement sales (the purchase price is the total invoice price less applicable sales tax) under this Cooperative Purchasing Agreement. The sum owed by Contractor to Enterprise Services as a result of the VMF is calculated as follows: Amount owed to Enterprise Services = Total Contract sales invoiced (not including sales tax) x .0125. The VMF must be rolled into Contractor’s current pricing. The VMF must not be shown as a separate line item on any invoice unless specifically requested and approved by Enterprise Services. Enterprise Services shall invoice Contractor quarterly based on Contract sales reported by Contractor. Contractor is not to remit payment until Contractor receives an invoice from Enterprise Services. Payments must be received within thirty (30) calendar days of the invoice issue date from Enterprise Services. Contractor’s VMF payment to Enterprise Services must reference the invoice number. Contractor’s VMF payment to Enterprise Services must reference this Contract number, the year and quarter for which the VMF is being remitted, and Contractor’s name as set forth in this Contract, if not already included on the face of the check. Contractor’s failure to report accurate total net Contract sales, to submit a timely Contract sales report, or to remit timely payment of the VMF to Enterprise Services, shall be cause for Enterprise Services, at its discretion, to suspend Contractor or terminate this Contract or exercise remedies provided by law. Without limiting any other available remedies, the parties agree that Contractor’s failure to remit to Enterprise Services timely payment of the VMF shall obligate Contractor to pay to Enterprise Services, to offset the administrative and transaction costs incurred by the State to identify, process, and collect such sums, the sum of $200.00 or twenty-five percent (25%) of the outstanding amount, whichever is greater, or the maximum allowed by law, if less. Enterprise Services reserves the right, upon thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice, to increase, reduce, or eliminate the VMF for subsequent purchases, and reserves the right to renegotiate Contract pricing with Contractor when any subsequent adjustment of the VMF might justify a change in pricing. Annual Contract Sales Report. Contractor shall provide to Enterprise Services a detailed annual Contract sales report. Such report shall include, at a minimum, the following: The Goods and/or Services sold and provided (including, as applicable, category or another identifier); Services purchased by Purchaser; and Contract price. This report must be provided in an electronic format that can be read by Microsoft (MS) Excel. Such report is due within thirty (30) calendar days of the annual anniversary of the effective date of this Contract.

  • Minimum Vendor License Requirements Vendor shall maintain, in current status, all federal, state, and local licenses, bonds and permits required for the operation of the business conducted by Vendor. Vendor shall remain fully informed of and in compliance with all ordinances and regulations pertaining to the lawful provision of goods or services under the TIPS Agreement. TIPS and TIPS Members reserve the right to stop work and/or cancel a TIPS Sale or terminate this or any TIPS Sale Supplemental Agreement involving Vendor if Vendor’s license(s) required to perform under this Agreement or under the specific TIPS Sale have expired, lapsed, are suspended or terminated subject to a 30‐day cure period unless prohibited by applicable statue or regulation.