Current performance Sample Clauses

Current performance. An employee who has been absent in excess of three months in the year shall have the review delayed
View SourceView Similar (3)
Current performance. The University currently offers a range of bursaries and other types of financial support to students as part our approved Access Agreement. These have been targeted at students with particular financial circumstances or are designed to encourage participation and raise aspirations from low participation neighbourhoods through partnership with schools and colleges. There is evidence that some of our more targeted bursaries such as those for care leavers might be significant, as are the funds which are distributed in response to evidenced circumstances of hardship.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Current performance. The University has a strong national reputation for recruiting students from a broad range of social backgrounds and securing high rates of progression and retention. This is clearly evidenced by the University's performance against HEFCE PI's for non-continuation following year of entry and projected learning outcomes shown in Figures 2 and 3 below.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Current performance. 2003/04 BASCD Survey (v) 1.23 (vi) Performance at the end of the period of the Local PSA: i 31 March ii during the period of the LPSA 1 April 2005 - 31 March 2008 iii 31 March iv during the LPSA period iv during the period of the LPSA 1 April 2005 - 31 March 2008 Overall Rank 2003/4 (top 20 of 103) Estates with Difficulties (Consistently ranked with more difficulties) Change from previous position Comment 3 Year Average Rank
View Source
Current performance. There are no existing ‘hard’ benchmarks for any of the proposed indicators, but an agreed survey and benchmarking exercise will be carried out to provide baseline data for indicators 1-3 in the 2nd Quarter 2003-4, and reported to the relevant LSPs during Qtr3, 2003-4. Performance expected without the Local PSA + 4 percentage points + 6 percentage points + 0 percentage points Performance target with the Local PSA + 9 percentage points + 11 percentage points + 7 percentage points Enhancement in performance with the Local PSA + 5 percentage points + 5 percentage points + 7 percentage points Target Indicator 4 5 6 7 Increase in the no. No. of forums with No. of forums with number of Forums of uses of evidence of evidence of youth giving regular innovative inputing to the participation interaction with opportunities1 for District or LSP level mechanisms providers of local views of citizens/ Community public service local communities Strategies delivery to be heard None Condition of Grant: To receive the Performance Reward Grant allocated to Indicator 6, each of the public spending bodies listed above must attend at least one forum meeting per neighbourhood forum area in 2005/06 financial year. Increase the overall rate of recycling and composting at all civic amenity sites to at least 40% (excluding rubble) by the end of 2005/6 Local PI % of waste recycled and composted from all civic amenity sites x 100 15% Performance expected without the Local PSA 21% Performance target with the Local PSA 40% Enhancement in performance with the Local PSA + 19 percentage points Need to quantify effect on overall recycling rate None ▪ Allow waste collection arrangements and civic amenity sites to be managed under the same contract ▪ Power to charge householders for disposal of mixed waste at Civic Amenity Sites – only to be used after intensive publicity to persuade households to use recycling schemes ▪ Allow the proposed allocation of two-thirds of the Landfill Tax Credit Scheme funding to sustainable waste management to be invested directly by the County Council in promoting recycling and composting at civic amenity sites and by the District Councils and the County Council in promoting the wider recycling/composting and waste minimisation agenda throughout Cumbria ▪ Support for the County Council in developing, with District Councils, the payment of waste minimisation credits or other financial incentives to encourage reductions in the amount of household waste produced. ▪ A...
View Source
Current performance. For incremental progression following a review, refer to clause 10.3.
View Source
Current performance. There are no existing ‘hard’ benchmarks for any of the indicators, but an agreed survey will be carried out to provide baseline data for each indicator in April/May 2003. Performance expected without the Local PSA] + 4 percentage points + 6 percentage points + 0 percentage points Performance target with the Local PSA + 9 percentage points + 11 percentage points + 7 percentage points Enhancement in performance with the Local PSA + 5 percentage points + 5 percentage points + 7 percentage points None ▪ In the event of Cumbria County Council demonstrating that other public spending bodies are not contributing to enhancing local public spending accountability arrangements, the government agrees to mediate between interested parties to maximise collaborative local working.
View Source
Current performance. The University’s first time undergraduate cohort for 2015/16 is expressed in the following tables. We observed a slight decrease in the 2015/16 performance to meet our location adjusted benchmark for students from low participation neighbourhoods, due to changes in student recruitment trends. Our approach continues to be focused on outreach activities in LPNs as detailed previously. The number of students entering Brunel who are eligible for DSA remains high, exceeding our expected benchmark by a considerable margin, no doubt a function of our dedicated Disability and Dyslexia service. However, the review of DSA eligibility criteria will probably affect this benchmark and we will undertake a review of our performance against this indicator by 2017/18 in the light of our own disability data. In common with much of the sector, efforts to increase the number of mature students have not been successful and the percentage has dropped. The appointment of a co-ordinator in 2016 with responsibility for mature learners is helping to redress the situation. HESA Table T1a From low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR3) Year Brunel % Location adjusted Benchmark UK Average HESA Table T7 In Receipt of Disabled Students' Allowance Year % with DSA Benchmark UK Average 2015/16 7.0 6.4 6.8 2014/15 8.2 6.5 7.0 2013/14 8.7 6.5 6.9 2012/13 9.2 6.2 6.5 2011/12 8.0 5.7 5.9 2010/11 7.0 5.2 5.3 2009/10 5.4 4.7 4.9 HESA Table T2a From low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR3) Year Brunel % Location adjusted Benchmark UK Averag e 2014/15 3.9 5.8 12.8 2013/14 4.7 7.5 11.9 2012/13 4.8 6.9 11.6 2011/12 4.5 5.7 10.9 2010/11 4.3 5.7 10.9 2009/10 3.7 5.7 10.6
View Source
Current performance. April 2001 – March 2002 (actuals to Jan 2002 plus estimates for Feb/March) Local 1027 referrals by the Employment Service to Work Based Learning for adults; Local 347 people started a WBLA training programme; National 17people commenced employment following completion of a WBLA training programme
View Source

Related to Current performance

  • Continuing Performance In the event of a dispute, the Owner and the Developer agree to continue their respective performance hereunder to the extent feasible in light of the dispute, including paying ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and such continuation of efforts and payment of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall not be construed as a waiver of any legal right.

  • Past Performance The Government will evaluate the contractor's performance on the NETCENTS-2 Orders provided in Exhibit B, CDRL B001. The PCO will determine the quality of the work performed based on an integrated assessment of data obtained in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS) and information obtained from Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) channels, interviews with customers, program managers and/or contracting officers for NETCENTS-2 task orders. Based on the contractor performance records above, the PCO will determine if there is an expectation that the contractor will successfully perform the required efforts under the unrestricted NetOps and Infrastructure Solutions contract.

  • Contract Performance C19.1 The Contractor shall ensure that: C19.1.1 the Goods conform in all respects with the Specification and, where applicable, with any sample or performance demonstration approved by the Authority; C19.1.2 the Goods operate in accordance with the relevant technical specifications and correspond with the requirements of the Specification and any particulars specified in the Contract; C19.1.3 the Goods conform in all respects with all applicable Laws; and C19.1.4 the Goods are free from defects in design, materials and workmanship and are fit and sufficient for all the purposes for which such Goods are ordinarily used and for any particular purpose made known to the Contractor by the Authority.

  • Product Performance Contractor hereby warrants and represents that the Products acquired by the Authorized User under the terms and conditions of this Contract conform to the specifications, performance standards and documentation in the Authorized User Agreement., and the documentation fully describes the proper procedure for using the Products. Contractor further warrants and represents that if the Products acquired by the Authorized User pursuant to an Authorized User Agreement under this Contract include software application development, software application customization, software programming, software integration or similar items (“Software Deliverables”) then such Software Deliverables shall be free from defects in material and workmanship and conform with all requirements of the Contract and Authorized User Agreement for the warranty period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance of the completed project (“Project warranty period”). Contractor also warrants that the Products, in the form provided to the Authorized User, do not infringe any copyright, trademark, trade secret or other right of any third party.

  • Work Performance ▇▇▇▇▇▇ agrees that all Services performed hereunder shall be performed on a best effort basis by employees, students, faculty, graduate assistants and staff having an appropriate experience and skill level and in compliance with the statement of work.