FACULTY PERFORMANCE REVIEWS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Sample Clauses

The "Faculty Performance Reviews and Professional Development" clause establishes the procedures and expectations for evaluating faculty members' job performance and supporting their ongoing professional growth. Typically, this clause outlines the frequency and criteria for performance reviews, such as annual evaluations based on teaching effectiveness, research output, and service contributions. It may also specify opportunities or requirements for faculty to participate in workshops, training, or other development activities. The core function of this clause is to ensure accountability, promote continuous improvement among faculty, and align individual performance with institutional goals.
FACULTY PERFORMANCE REVIEWS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. A. The purpose of faculty performance reviews and professional development is to establish a continuous improvement process focused on improving service and student learning outcomes while supporting professional growth on a systematic basis.
FACULTY PERFORMANCE REVIEWS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. I. Change in Status Reviews 1. [NO CHANGE] 2. [NO CHANGE] 3. [NO CHANGE] 4. [NO CHANGE] 5. No later than June 30, a faculty member intending to apply for Change in Status must submit who currently satisfies the criteria for consideration for Change in Status described in Article XIV or will satisfy those criteria by December 23 may apply for Change in Status by submitting the required application and any materials required to be submitted by that date. a. A full-time faculty member is eligible to apply for Change in Status at the end of their second academic year of work as long as they will have worked for three b. A part-time faculty member is eligible to apply for Change in Status if they currently satisfy or will satisfy by December 23 the criteria for consideration for Change in Status described in Article XIV, J.. 6. Not later than the beginning of Fall semester, the College will determine if the faculty member currently satisfies the requirements for change in status or is on track to satisfy the requirements by the dates listed above in (5) December 23 of the current calendar year and will notify the member of its determination. A member who has applied for Change in Status and is determined to currently satisfy the requirements for Change in Status or to be on track to satisfy the requirements by December 23 will be removed from the periodic performance review schedule for the coming academic year and placed on the Change in Status review schedule. 7. The Change in Status review will involve consideration of the member by the member’s Supervising Administrator and a Peer Review Committee made up of three to five non-probationary bargaining unit members, a majority of whom will be from the member’s academic or professional discipline selected in accordance with standards established by mutual agreement of the College and the Association. Any exceptions to this committee structure will be approved by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ or their designee and the MAHE President or designee. Members participating on a Peer Review Committee must have completed training for the committee service prior to serving on any Change in Status Peer Review. 8. [NO CHANGE] 9. [NO CHANGE] 10. [NO CHANGE] 20.ARTICLE XIV. FACULTY PERFORMANCE REVIEWS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
FACULTY PERFORMANCE REVIEWS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. A. The purpose of faculty performance reviews and professional development is to establish a continuous improvement process focused on improving service and student learning outcomes while supporting professional growth on a systematic basis. B. Periodic Performance Reviews 1. Beginning not later than the 2013-14 academic year, faculty members will be given periodic performance reviews according to the following schedule: Probationary Full-Time Teaching Faculty Annual Probationary Full-Time Academic Professional Annual Probationary Part-Time Teaching Faculty Within first 24 workload hours and each 40 workload hours thereafter Probationary Part-Time Academic Professional Within first 1,000 clock hours and each 1,000 clock hours thereafter Continuing Contract Full-Time Teaching Faculty Every 4th academic year after achieving Continuing Contract status Continuing Contract Full-Time Academic Professional Every 4th academic year after achieving Continuing Contract status Associate Continuing Contract Part-Time Teaching Faculty Every 4th academic year after achieving Associate Continuing Contract status Associate Continuing Contract Part-Time Academic Professional Every 4th academic year after achieving Associate Continuing Contract status The Human Resources Department will establish a rotating schedule for periodic performance reviews of post-probationary bargaining unit members. Members scheduled for a periodic review will be so advised no later than August 30 of the academic year for which the review is scheduled. If a periodic review cannot be completed (e.g., because the member is on leave of absence or layoff, etc.), it will be rescheduled for the following academic year. 2. Periodic performance reviews will address performance of professional responsibilities (as summarized in Article VIII.); adherence to professional standards and codes of ethics if applicable; relationships with peers and students; and other work-related criteria. At a minimum, periodic performance reviews will be based on the following components if they are available. Components that are not available at the time of the periodic performance review will not be considered.

Related to FACULTY PERFORMANCE REVIEWS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

  • Professional Development Program (a) The parties agree to continue a Professional Development Program for the maintenance and development of the faculty members' professional competence and effectiveness. It is agreed that maintenance of currency of subject knowledge, the improvement of performance of faculty duties, and the maintenance and improvement of professional competence, including instructional skills, are the primary professional development activities of faculty members. (b) Information collected as part of this program shall be the sole property of the faculty member. This information or any judgments arising from this program shall not be used to determine non-renewal or termination of a faculty member's contract, suspension or dismissal of a faculty member, denial of advancement on the salary scale, nor affect any other administrative decisions pertaining to the promotion or employment status of the faculty member. (c) A joint advisory committee consisting of three regular faculty members who shall be elected by and are P.D. Committee Chairpersons and three administrators shall make recommendations for the operation, financing and management of the Professional Development Program.

  • Professional Development Plan Professional Development Plan (PDP) refers to plans developed by faculty members addressing the criteria contained in Article 22 and Appendix G.

  • Professional Development Leave A. Policy. Professional development leave shall be made available to employees who meet the requirements set forth below. Such leaves are granted to increase an employee's value to the University through enhanced opportunities for professional renewal, educational travel, study, formal education, research, writing, or other experience of professional value, not as a reward for service.