Final Results Sample Clauses
The "Final Results" clause defines how and when the outcomes or deliverables of a project, service, or transaction are considered complete and accepted by the parties involved. Typically, this clause outlines the criteria for completion, the process for review or approval, and any obligations for providing documentation or evidence of completion. Its core practical function is to establish a clear endpoint for obligations, reducing ambiguity and potential disputes about whether the agreed-upon work has been satisfactorily finished.
Final Results. In the performance of the Services, the Consultant has the authority to control and direct the performance of the details of the Services, the Company being interested only in the results obtained. However, the Services contemplated by this Agreement must meet the Company’s standards and approval and shall be subject to the Company’s general right of inspection and supervision to secure their satisfactory completion.
Final Results. The Recipient, through organizing, planning and project development, will (1) implement the Project, and (2) submit a report of the Project aspects accomplished to the City prior to payment on the contract.
Final Results. In the performance of the Services, Contractor has the authority to control and direct the performance of the details of the Services, A123 being interested only in the results obtained. However, the Services contemplated herein must meet A123’s standards and approval and shall be subject to the Company’s general right of inspection and supervision to secure their satisfactory completion.
Final Results. In the performance of the Services, Independent Contractor has the authority to control and direct the performance of the details of the Services, the Company being interested only in the results obtained. However, the Services contemplated herein must meet the Company’s standards and approval.
Final Results. Finding sufficient record evidence existed to quantify the impact of the PMS on production costs, Commerce calculated the amount of the upward adjustment using the beta coefficient for uneconomic capacity from an ordinary least squares fixed-effects regression model origi- ▇▇▇▇▇ submitted by the Domestic Interested Parties as part of the PMS Allegation with certain modifications by Commerce. Final De- cision Memo. at 32–44; PMS Allegation at Exs. 56, 62. Commerce determined the normal value of NEXTEEL’s subject merchandise using constructed value, based on data submitted by NEXTEEL, with adjustments to NEXTEEL’s reported costs for HRC to account for the PMS, non-prime WLP products, costs of goods sold (“COGS”), and general and administrative expenses. [WLP from Ko- rea] 85 Fed. Reg. 7,269 (Dep’t Commerce Feb. 7, 2020) (prelim. admin. review) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memo. at 19–20. Issues and Decision Memo. at 19–20, A-580–876, Jan. 31, 2020 (“Prelim. Decision Memo.”); Final Decision Memo. at 3; NEXTEEL’s Prelim. Calculation Memo., CD 459 bar code 3938526–01 (Jan. 31, 2020); NEXTEEL’s Final Calculation Memo., CD 480 bar code 4056576–01 (Nov. 20, 2020). Commerce determined the normal value of SeAH’s subject merchandise using SeAH’s home market sales, with adjustments to SeAH’s reported HRC cost to account for the PMS for the purpose of the sales-below-cost test; and constructed value where there were no identical home market sales in the ordinary course of trade, with an adjustment to SeAH’s reported cost for HRC to account for the PMS. Prelim. Decision Memo. at 21–22; Final Decision Memo. at 3; SeAH’s Prelim. Calculation Memo., CD 461 bar code 3938891–01 (Jan. 31, 2020) (“SeAH’s Prelim. Calc.”); SeAH’s Final Calculation Memo., CD 484 bar code 4056688–01 (Nov. 20, 2020). Between September 22, 2021, and October 20, 2021, parties fully briefed the issues. Def.’s Resp. Pls.’ Mots. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇., ▇▇▇▇. ▇▇, ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ No. 69 (“Def. Br.”); Resp. Br. Def.-Intervenors Maverick Tube Corporation and IPSCO Tubulars Inc., Sept. 22, 2021, ECF No. 70 (“Maverick’s and IPSCO’s Br.”); Def.-Intervenors’ Resp. Br., Sept. 22, 2021, ECF No. 71 (“Def.-Intervenors’ Br.”); Pl.-Intervenor [Husteel]’s Reply Br. Supp. Mot. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇., ▇▇▇. ▇▇, ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ No. 74; Reply Br. [SeAH], Oct. 20, 2021, ECF No. 75; Reply Br. Supp. [NEXTEEL]’s Mot. for ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇., ▇▇▇. ▇▇, ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ No. 76; Reply Br. of Consol. Pl. and Pl.-Intervenor [Hyundai], Oct. 20, 2021, ECF No. 77. On Januar...
Final Results. The North Miami Police Department may provide seniority points (if applicable) for each candidate eligible to participate in the promotional process. The Assessment Center will calculate final results by way of combining standard scores for all components of the promotional process including seniority and provide a final rank ordered list to the Department as well as individual candidate reports with performance comparison date to each candidate. The Assessment Center will utilize the weights of each component of the promotional as outlined in Department Policy, Bargaining Agreements, and/or Civil Service Rules. In the absence of such stipulations, the Assessment Center will make recommendations to the North Miami Police Department regarding the weights to be applied to the components of the promotional process based on literature support and best practices in the industry. RESULTS & TECHNICAL REPORTS Once all exercises are scored, consultant will aggregate written and assessment scores for each candidate taking into account the designated weights for each component and seniority points may be added provided if in accordance with applicable Departmental contractual requirements. Candidates will be ranked in descending order based on the composite score on the promotional process. Consultant will provide a technical report describing all aspects of the process within thirty working (30) days from the submission of the results. Job Analysis Review No Charge Development and preparation of Reading List including meetings with Subject Matter Experts (SME) and review of related materials $500.00 Development of Written Examination $2,000.00 Preparation of Candidate Test Notification Letters & Candidate Orientation Guide $250.00 Execution of 1 comprehensive candidate orientation $350.00 Administration Venue, Set Up, & Tear Down No Charge 1 Assessment Analyst (1 day) $250.00 Oversee Item Challenge Review $500.00 Conduct Statistical Item Analysis $500.00 Prepare Written Response to Item Challenges $500.00 Preparation of Final Results & Technical Report $500.00 Meeting Rooms No Charge Job Analysis Review & Report No Charge Assessment Center Exercise (Including development of all assessors checklists and training materials) $7,000.00 Orientation & Test Administration Venue No Charge Orientation & Materials $250.00 Assessment Center Administrations (BADGE, Interactive, In-Basket, Evaluation Coordination, Proctoring & Oversight (Max 50 Candidates in 2 Day) $1,500.00 Med...
Final Results. The Landlord shall let the office premises according to the Terms of Reference for rent to the Tenant within the period specified in the rent agreement but not later than 01/02/2019; and ensure unconditional compliance with the agreement provisions. The premises are to be let for rent for 24 months from the date of the acceptance certificate.
Final Results. All results will be completed by prior to the September 22 Joint PAC and TAC Meeting. We will present information to a WAMPO staff meeting, in order to determine how to show the results and develop content for the September 22nd meeting.