Geotechnical Analysis Sample Clauses

The Geotechnical Analysis clause establishes the requirement for conducting studies and assessments of soil, rock, groundwater, and other subsurface conditions at a project site. Typically, this involves hiring qualified professionals to perform site investigations, laboratory testing, and reporting on factors such as soil stability, bearing capacity, and potential hazards like contamination or groundwater intrusion. By mandating such analysis, the clause ensures that design and construction decisions are based on reliable data, thereby reducing the risk of unforeseen site conditions and associated project delays or cost overruns.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Geotechnical Analysis. The geotechnical analysis shall be based on both the currently available geotechnical site information and the results of the new field investigation. The following items shall be addressed by the geotechnical analysis: 1. Provide seismic design requirements and recommendations based on Los Angeles Building Code criteria and considering the significance of the Palos Verdes Fault.
Geotechnical Analysis. Sampling and analysis of soils and hydrologies, and subsequent reporting and recommendations, upon which architectural and engineering designs may be based. Applicable to Construction Stage observation, testing, and reporting of soils conditions, including testing for types and quality of fill material and its installation, compaction, soil density testing, caisson borings inspections, cut and fill monitoring, etc.
Geotechnical Analysis. The Design-Builder shall select a licensed geotechnical engineer to consult with the Owner and Design Professional and perform geotechnical evaluations of the Site, complete the Stage 1 Statement set forth in the Site Investigations Report and ultimately produce the Stage 2 Statement. The Design Professional shall fully utilize the geotechnical engineer to identify to the extent practicable all adverse site conditions such that the Design Professional has sound information upon which to base the design of the Project and to minimize the risk of unforeseen site conditions upon commencement of construction.
Geotechnical Analysis. Consultant will perform analyses of the field and laboratory test data to develop geotechnical recommendations for retaining wall, foundation design and construction. Consultant will provide the analysis and design for foundations in accordance with current ODOT GDM, FHWA, AASHTO, and City of West Linn design guidelines. Geotechnical analysis must include:  Seismic design parameters including an assessment of liquefaction and lateral spreading potential at the site.  Feasible wall type for each wall type, nominal bearing resistance and bearing strata, estimated settlements, design lateral earth pressure, coefficient of friction, and internal and external stability.
Geotechnical Analysis. The ENGINEER will utilize a subconsultant to perform geotechnical analysis to determine an asphalt pavement recommendation and soil information for the design of headwalls at up to seven (7) culvert crossing locations.
Geotechnical Analysis a. The A-E shall review the geotechnical report(s) and Bridge Type Selection Report (BTSR). If the A-E believes there is missing or outdated information contained in the reports, the A-E shall discuss with OCPW and develop a plan to address the items of concern. The A-E shall have the ability to perform any additional geotechnical site investigations necessary to complete the PS&E package. Draft Updated Geotechnical Report (if needed) Final Updated Geotechnical Report (if needed) Draft Updated Bridge Type Selection Report (if needed) Final Updated Bridge Type Selection Report (if needed) Geotechnical Analysis Anticipated Deliverables
Geotechnical Analysis a. The A-E shall have a Geotech consultant perform appropriate field inspections and evaluation to confirm the most appropriate remediation measures. The A-E will develop a preliminary design and cost analysis for possible measures for the County’s review and provide a recommended approach for approval. The consultant(s) will finalize design drawings and specifications for the recommended mitigation approach in order to provide safe, cost effective, reliable hazard protection. b. Mitigation measures will meet the requirement to provide protection of rockfall debris to people and structures. The consultant will confirm standard and industry-recognized manufacturers and replacement components in the design documents. Items to be considered shall include, but not be limited to, product reliability and performance, manufacturer’s years of service, equipment costs, warranties, guarantees, delivery schedule, etc.
Geotechnical Analysis. Using the aforementioned survey and geotechnical information an analysis of the slope stability will be performed. The analysis will include: • Determine cross section and stratigraphy at one location. • Develop soil parameters at the cross-section location. • Slope stability analysis at the cross-section location.
Geotechnical Analysis. The Department will complete a subsurface investigation in the area. Geotechnical laboratory testing will be performed for soil classification to provide engineering parameters for geotechnical design.
Geotechnical Analysis. Two structural borings as well as a boring near the stream bed will be completed by our subconsultant, Wang Engineering to determine the stream material for the scour critical analysis. A detailed scope of work by ▇▇▇▇ is attached. ▇▇▇▇ anticipates the need to conduct the borings on the O’Brien Road pavement, which will require temporary lane closures and traffic control. The bridge overlay material and bearing pads will be evaluated for asbestos materials. If these cannot be eliminated by review of existing plan details, the HMA overlay material will be sampled and tested for asbestos material. HLR’s work efforts will include coordination of ▇▇▇▇’▇ work with the requirements of the project and review of the results of the borings. HLR will obtain the FEMA Category 6 Flood Insurance Study Data files in digital or printed format (USGS information is not necessary). HLR will conduct a field review of the site and then create an existing (baseline) conditions hydraulic model. This model will be used to evaluate the scour critical evaluation of the existing pile foundations and to model the hydraulics of alternative proposed bridge rehabilitation design. It is anticipated that the proposed deck replacement will not modify the existing hydraulic conditions. HLR will also develop a preliminary plan for the localized drainage on the roadway approaches. Compensatory storage and stormwater detention requirements (if needed) will be developed based on the recommended bridge design alternate and will adhere to the McHenry County Stormwater Ordinance. HLR will develop and prepare the project Hydraulic Report in the IDOT BLR format and will summarize the results in the IDOT Waterway Information Table, coordinating this effort with McHenry County. A Scour Evaluation will be completed for the proposed structure, including recommended riprap countermeasures. HLR will also develop a preliminary plan for the localized drainage along the roadway approaches. HLR will develop and prepare the Preliminary Bridge Design and Hydraulic Report in the IDOT BLR format. Results will be summarized in the IDOT Waterway Information Table, coordinating this effort with McHenry County. HLR will investigate alternate types of superstructures and make recommendations based on the economics, durability, aesthetics and compatibility to the site and stream conditions. It is anticipated that two bridge design alternates will be evaluated, including replacement and rehabilitation options. These in...