Design Parameters Sample Clauses

Design Parameters. For the railway case study, two kinds of parameters can be di erentiated. The rst group of parameters correspond to real numbers (or function of real numbers) such as Kinetic energy, communication or physical movement delay, track length, track slope (function of position) or traction acceleration (function of speed), or breaking force. The other group of parameters is rather a choice of decomposition of a whole track map into several distributed one, and the corresponding distributed interlocking. Thus, such parameters are a set of subsets of the track map database tuples. One can also consider a varying number of trains. The parameters may be related, such as minimal and maximal kinetic energy, or minimal or maximal slope, or traction acceleration.

Design Parameters. (i) The design storm shall be a 100-year return period, for a 1-day, 2-day or 5-day duration storm event whichever generates critical hydraulic conditions in the impacted drainage system that is within the watershed either upstream or downstream of the Concession Highway (an “Impacted Drainage System”); and (ii) The design boundary condition for each of the storm events referred to in Section 7.2(b)(i) of this Part is a tidal surge event when the highest water surface elevations at the outfalls coincide with the peak of the design storm event.

Design Parameters. The political agreement from 22.05.2023 states that ministerial approval of a hydrogen infrastructure construction project depends on Energinet’s ability to demonstrate concrete, long-term demand and willingness-to-pay from future users of the hydrogen infrastructure. Another political agreement about financing, which may specify this requirement further, is currently underway.

Design Parameters. For the automotive case study, two categories of parameters can be differ- entiated: The first group of design parameters that can be varied during an DSE experiment defines the vehicle: vehicle mass, aerodynamic drag coeffi- cient cw, rolling friction coefficient crr, battery capacity C, and the full load curve, defined by the maximum engine speed nmax and the maximum torque Mmax. The second set of parameters defines the route the vehicle takes to get from the start position to its destination. These parameters can be de- scribed as a set of coordinates. For a typical DSE experiment in the context of INTO-CPS, the first set of parameters, defining the vehicle, is most likely the more relevant group. The vehicle design parameters can depend on each other, e.g. the battery capacity has an influence on the total mass.

Design Parameters. DSE is used in building automation to: (a) identify the optimal equipment and control settings for an existing building; (b) study the equipment scal- ability over different building thermal characteristics. In the following we highlight the key design parameters used in the building automation case study: 1. Maximum water flow rate: m·water ∈ [0.08 : 0.12] 2. Maximum air flow rate: m·air ∈ [0.4 : 0.6] 3. Water coil efficiency: ϵcoil ∈ [ 0.1 : 1 Control Design Parameters: tuning these parameters lead to identify the optimal PID control response to the building thermal load. 1. Proportional set-point weighting: Kp ∈ [0 : 1] 2. Derivative set-point weighting: Kd ∈ [0 : 1] 1. Wall density: ρwall ∈ [960 : 1600] 2. Wall thermal conductivity: λwall ∈ [0.0865 : 0.1298] Considering that these parameters are independent, then the search space for optimizing equipment setting is m·water × ▇▇▇▇ × ϵcoil × Kp × Kd . Whereas, the search space for equipment scalability study is ρwall × λwall.

Design Parameters. (a) The parties acknowledge that the conceptual design set forth on Exhibit “F” attached hereto and made a part hereof is consistent with their expectations as of the date of this Agreement. Without limiting the Township’s ability to approve the plans and specifications for the land development approvals consistent with the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Lower Merion Township Zoning Code and all other Laws (none of which shall be deemed to occur under this Agreement but rather in the ordinary course according to the Township’s practice and procedure), the Township shall have the right to approve final plans for the Project (the “Approved Plans”); provided, however, that the Township shall not unreasonably withhold, delay or condition its consent under this subsection (a) so long as the design reflected in the plans is consistent with the conceptual design attached hereto as Exhibit “F.” No approval of the design, construction documents or any other aspect of the Private Project shall be deemed to impose any liability upon the Township, it being understood that such review is for the Township’s own purposes and not to be construed as a representation or warranty that the Private Project has been designed or constructed in conformance with applicable Laws. Dranoff shall remain solely responsible to review and approve, or cause qualified professionals to review and approve, the design and construction of the Private Project. Further, no approvals under this Section 1.4(a) or otherwise under this Agreement shall in any way be construed to constitute an approval of the plans and specifications for purposes of land development, zoning, building codes, the Municipalities Planning Code, or any other Laws for any other purpose whatsoever except for compliance with this Agreement. (b) In addition to all other Township approvals, the Township shall have the right to approve, in its reasonable discretion, (i) the design of any material elements of the Private Project visible from the exterior of the Private Project, including, but not limited to, building exteriors, landscaping, pedestrian walkways, and public spaces, and, until completion of the Project, (ii) (A) joint venture partners, members or shareholders (provided, however, that to the extent that Dranoff retains Control of the Project, the Township shall not have such right; provided, further, that if such partners, members or shareholders have the right to obtain Control

Design Parameters. Developer shall ensure that bridges crossing over waterways withstand a 100-year frequency event with no loss of structural integrity. Bridges crossing over the Project shall, at a minimum, be designed to accommodate the Ultimate Configuration and all planned expansions or updates of each facility by its respective owner as designated in the owner’s current transportation master plan. Alignments shall meet the requirements indicated in Book 2, Section 11 for the functional classification of each roadway. Developer shall design bridge structures required for the Interim Configuration, if applicable, to the total length and span arrangement required for the Ultimate Configuration, including spanning future lanes that will be constructed below the structure as a part of the Ultimate Configuration. Unless otherwise noted, the design of all roadway and pedestrian structural elements shall be based on the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) methodology included in TxDOT’s LRFD Bridge Design Manual. Developer shall design bridge structures to accommodate the Ultimate Configuration and construct bridge structures to the width required for the interim configuration. Developer shall ensure that bridges constructed for the interim configuration can be widened to the Ultimate Configuration width at a later date with minimal or no impact to aesthetics and traffic. Direct-connect structures shall be constructed to satisfy the Ultimate Configuration. In locations where the interim configuration does not call for the construction of the direct-connect structures, Developer shall make provisions to accommodate the future construction.

Design Parameters. 1 Design parameters for the system shall be as defined in the Specifications and/or the operating descriptions.

Design Parameters. In the agricultural case study, we have two categories of parameters. The first category defines the robot and its operation conditions. The second category defines the parameters of the surrounding environments. The first category has internal dependencies, like total weight, wheel size/operation speed, sensors and control software. But there are also dependencies between the two categories, the wheel slip will affect the operating speed and the surface type will affect the wheel slip. Crop type will affect the width of the robot because the robot needs to fit the row distance for the current crop. Current placement of the robot in the environment has a significant impact on how the controller should operate in terms of movement and operational strategy.