Leveraging monitoring for actions Sample Clauses

Leveraging monitoring for actions. The Global Partnership Steering Committee also agreed to take a ‘whole of GPEDC approach’, underpinned by the following four ‘foundational elements’ in order to drive coherence across the Work Programme and ensure real impact on the ground: • Anchoring effectiveness efforts at country level • Fostering constituency engagement • Promoting knowledge exchange and mainstreaming learning • Leveraging stakeholder-led political outreach and advocacy Furthermore, the Global Partnership launched country-led Action Dialogues for Effective Development Co-operation at the beginning of 2021. The Action Dialogues aim to draw upon the evidence, learning and data from the monitoring of effective development co-operation (where available) and the four effectiveness principles to build a shared understanding and concrete steps to strengthen effectiveness of co-operation and partnerships at the country level. The initiative is considered a key substantive input to the HLM3, planned to take place in late 2022. UNDP, together with OECD, provides institutional support to the effective functioning of the Global Partnership as the OECD/UNDP Joint Support Team, based on the main responsibilities as defined in the renewed mandate of the Global Partnership (Nairobi Outcome Document: Renewed Mandate §28). The implementation of the 2020-2022 Work Programme, led by the Co-Chairs and Steering Committee, and in line with the ‘whole of GPEDC approach’, requires continuous 1 Principles of effective development cooperation that guide the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation include: country ownership, focus on results, inclusive partnerships, and transparency and accountability. The Addis Ababa Action Agenda welcomes continuous efforts to improve the quality, impact and effectiveness of development cooperation and other international efforts in public finance, including adherence to agreed development cooperation effectiveness principles. It also underscores the centrality of country ownership and alignment, as well as use of programme-based approaches and reduction of fragmentation. Acceleration of the untying of aid, predictability and increasing transparency and mutual accountability are other important commitments made in the AAAA, which remain relevant for effective development cooperation. DocuSign Envelope ID: 8BD72C93-272C-4765-8DE6-EFE5C21BAFE5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 49A9860E-530C-4951-813A-2EF2ABAB6807 institutional support by the OECD-UNDP Joint Support Team in...
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Leveraging monitoring for actions

  • Project Monitoring by the State The State may conduct on-site or off-site monitoring reviews of the Project during the term of this Grant Agreement and for up to ninety (90) days after it expires or is otherwise terminated. The Grantee shall extend its full cooperation and give full access to the Project site and to relevant documentation to the State or its authorized designees for the purpose of determining, among other things: A. whether Project activities are consistent with those set forth in Exhibit A, the Grant Application, and the terms and conditions of the Grant Agreement; B. the actual expenditure of state, local and/or private funds expended to date on the Project is in conformity with the amounts for each Budget line item as set forth in Exhibit B and that unpaid costs have been properly accrued; C. that Grantee is making timely progress with the Project, and that its project management, financial management and control systems, procurement systems and methods, and overall performance are in conformance with the requirements set forth in this Grant Agreement and are fully and accurately reflected in Project reports submitted to the State.

  • Procedures for Actions and Consents of Partners The actions requiring Consent of any Partner or Partners pursuant to this Agreement, including Section 7.3 hereof, or otherwise pursuant to applicable law, are subject to the procedures set forth in this Article 14.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Response/Compliance with Audit or Inspection Findings A. Grantee must act to ensure its and its Subcontractors’ compliance with all corrections necessary to address any finding of noncompliance with any law, regulation, audit requirement, or generally accepted accounting principle, or any other deficiency identified in any audit, review, inspection or investigation of the Grant Agreement and the services and Deliverables provided. Any such correction will be at Grantee’s or its Subcontractor's sole expense. Whether ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s action corrects the noncompliance shall be solely the decision of the System Agency. B. As part of the services, Grantee must provide to HHS upon request a copy of those portions of Grantee's and its Subcontractors' internal audit reports relating to the services and Deliverables provided to the State under the Grant Agreement. C. Grantee shall include the requirement to provide to System Agency (and any of its duly authorized federal, state, or local authorities) internal audit reports related to this Grant Agreement in any Subcontract it awards. Upon request by System Agency, Grantee shall enforce this requirement against its Subcontractor. Further, Grantee shall include in any Subcontract it awards a requirement that all Subcontractor Subcontracts must also include these provisions.

  • Monitoring Services IDT staff shall, using methods that include face-to-face and other contacts with the member, monitor the services a member receives. This monitoring shall ensure that: a. The member receives the services and supports authorized, arranged for and coordinated by the IDT staff; b. The services and supports identified in the MCP as being provided by natural and community supports are being provided; and c. The quality of the services and supports received is adequate and still necessary to continue to meet the needs and preferences of the member and support the member’s outcomes identified in the MCP.