Measures and Methods Sample Clauses

Measures and Methods. The parties recognize that no single set of measures and methods can be prescribed to evaluate the quality of teaching and advising. Some of the measures and methods, however, include but are not limited to: i. Assessments by members of the candidate’s department and department chair or equivalent, particularly if based on examination of course materials, team teaching experiences, observations of the candidate’s teaching through class visitations, attendance at lectures given by the candidate or on the results of the candidate’s teaching in courses prerequisite to those of other department members. ii. Evaluations of teaching or advising by students, appropriately documented and interpreted, for example through the use of student course evaluations, advising questionnaires, post- graduate surveys, etc. Faculty are required to provide students with a department or other approved evaluation form in their courses. iii. Development by the candidate of new and effective techniques of instruction or assessment and instructional materials, including textbooks, particularly when evidenced by acceptance at other colleges or universities. This may also include the development and assessment of web-based courses and the effective transfer of current courses to a web-based format. iv. Publications by the candidate on the teaching of his or her discipline in respected journals. v. Recognitions and awards for distinguished teaching. vi. Evaluations from service-learning partners. vii. Evaluation of teaching by a co-instructor.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Measures and Methods. The parties recognize that no single set of measures and methods can be prescribed to evaluate the quality of teaching and advising. Some of the measures and methods, however, include but are not limited to: i. Assessments by members of the candidate’s department and department chair or equivalent, particularly if based on examination of course materials, team teaching experiences, observations of the candidate’s teaching through class visitations, attendance at lectures given by the candidate or on the results of the candidate’s teaching in courses prerequisite to those of other department members. ii. Evaluations of teaching or advising by students, appropriately documented and interpreted, for example through the use of student course evaluations, advising questionnaires, post- graduate surveys, etc. Faculty are required to administer a department or other approved student evaluation of teaching form in their courses. iii. Development by the candidate of new and effective techniques of instruction or assessment and instructional materials, including textbooks, particularly when evidenced by acceptance at other colleges or universities. This may also include the development and assessment of web-based courses and the effective transfer of current courses to a web-based format. iv. Publications by the candidate on the teaching of his or her discipline in respected journals. v. Recognitions and awards for distinguished teaching. vi. Evaluations from service-learning partners. vii. Evaluation of teaching by a co-instructor. D. Scholarship/Research/Creative Activity. Substantial and sustained scholarship/research/creative activity of high quality is an essential criterion for reappointment and promotion. Account shall be taken of the type and quality of creative activity normally expected in the candidate’s field. Documented evidence must be provided of genuine scholarship, productivity and creativity in the forms such as published research or recognized artistic production, engineering designs, and the like. In certain fields, such as art, music, literature and theatre, distinguished production may be evidence of scholarship in much the same way as analytical research is in other disciplines. In evaluating artistic creativity, the candidate’s merit should be assessed against criteria such as originality, scope and depth of creative expression. Publication of any research or other creative accomplishment must be evaluated, not merely listed, in reviewing the...
View Source

Related to Measures and Methods

  • Materials and Methods 86 2.1 PARTICIPANTS 87 We used baseline measurements from a convenience sample of participants in previous (3) and 88 ongoing cohort studies investigating the effects of rehabilitation on balance responses (Table 1). PD 89 participants were mild-moderate with bilateral symptoms (▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇ stage 2-3 (13)). All 90 participants provided written informed consent and all study procedures were approved by Institutional 91 Review Boards at the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University.

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Goods and Works International Competitive Bidding. Goods and works shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of International Competitive Bidding.

  • Non-Tariff Measures 1. A Party shall not adopt or maintain any non-tariff measures on the importation of any good of the other Party or on the exportation of any good destined for the territory of the other Party except in accordance with its WTO rights and obligations or in accordance with other provisions of this Agreement. 2. Each Party shall ensure its non-tariff measures permitted in paragraph 1 are not prepared, adopted or applied with a view to, or with the effect of, creating unnecessary obstacles to trade between the Parties.

  • Safeguard Measures Neither Party shall take safeguard action against services and service suppliers of the other Party from the date of entry into force of this Agreement. Neither Party shall initiate or continue any safeguard investigations in respect of services and service suppliers of the other Party.

  • Technical Safeguards 1. USAC and DSS will process the data matched and any data created by the match under the immediate supervision and control of authorized personnel to protect the confidentiality of the data, so unauthorized persons cannot retrieve any data by computer, remote terminal, or other means. 2. USAC and DSS will strictly limit authorization to these electronic data areas necessary for the authorized user to perform their official duties. All data in transit will be encrypted using algorithms that meet the requirements of the Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) Publication 140-2 or 140-3 (when applicable). 3. Authorized system users will be identified by User ID and password, and individually tracked to safeguard against the unauthorized access and use of the system. System logs of all user actions will be saved, tracked and monitored periodically. 4. USAC will transmit data to DSS via encrypted secure file delivery system. For each request, a response will be sent back to USAC to indicate success or failure of transmission.