PEER COMPONENT Clause Samples

PEER COMPONENT. In our architecture, the component of the di erent types of peers are as follows: an ontology engineering tool used to develop and maintain the common ontology. a book keeping component for managing the member peers of the community. a collection of local data. an XML wrapper to convert between local data and higher level model. an export schema tool to help the administrator in developing the subset of the local schema that is shared with other peers. Query response is a function for handling query, negotiation and for constructing and sending respons. a knowledge discover/concept adjustment tool used to related the peer concepts to common ontology. a query management which is a block used to write, re-write, send, re-send, and negotiate. a respond management which is a block used to receive and inte- grate the answer of query.

PEER COMPONENT. 5.6.2.1. For purposes of evaluation, a "peer" is defined as the Department Chair/Coordinator or full‑time designee consistent with the definition stipulated in Subsection 5.3. 5.6.2.2. For purposes of evaluation, a "review" is defined in Subsection 5. 3.1.2. The evaluator will summarize observations on the Evaluation Form and will give the evaluee a single summary rating on a five-point scale.

PEER COMPONENT. 5.5.2.1. The selection of the Peer Reviewer shall be made by the appropriate administrator in consultation with the Department Chair/Coordinator from a list of two (2) peers, as defined in section 5.3.1.1, chosen by the evaluee. 5.5.2.2. The Peer Review of a tenured faculty member shall be: (1) a standard "review" as defined in subsection 5.3.1.2., employing the Evaluation Form appropriate to the position title (see Appendix H). The evaluator will summarize observations on the Evaluation Form and will give the evaluee a single summary rating on a five-point scale. or (2) a review based on an assessment of a present or proposed special project, initiated by the evaluee and agreed upon by the Department and appropriate administrator. Such a project will aim to strengthen the evaluee’s teaching skills/resources or other activities that also further the vision and mission of departments, colleges, and District. Examples include, but are not limited to: (a) development of discussion-leading skills; (b) development of lecturing skills; (c) incorporation of non-print media presentations; (d) development of multimedia resources; (e) authoring a text; (f) curriculum development--developing new courses, significantly restructuring old ones; (g) development of alternative delivery systems. In case of an evaluation based on the above, the Peer Review will include (1) a brief description of the project, written by the evaluee, and (2) the peer assessment of the project or activity.

PEER COMPONENT. In accordance with Section 87663 of the California Education Code, a "peer review" of faculty performance shall be included in every evaluation. 5.3.1.1. For purposes of evaluation, a "peer" is defined as a tenured faculty member who teaches in the subject area in the C:\Documents and Settings\▇▇▇▇▇▇\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\3987C4KN\uf contract 2004-06.doc evaluee’s department. When this requirement cannot be met, then the peer shall be drawn from a related discipline at either college. 5.3.1.2. For purposes of evaluation, a "review" is defined as an observation of a teaching situation (laboratory, lecture) or other student contact situation (counseling, library orientation, etc.) for at least fifty (50) minutes and an assessment of compliance with the evaluee's responsibilities as stated in the job description or, in the case of tenured faculty, options for "review" are defined in 5.5.2.2.

PEER COMPONENT. CONTRACTOR shall ensure that service provisions at all levels shall 13 engage program Participants.

PEER COMPONENT. In accordance with Section 87663 of the California Education Code, a "peer review" of faculty performance shall be included in every evaluation. 5.3.1.1. For purposes of evaluation, a "peer" is defined as a tenured faculty member who teaches in the subject area in the evaluee’s department. When this requirement cannot be met, then the peer shall be drawn from a related discipline at either college. 5.3.1.2. For purposes of evaluation, a "review" is defined as an observation of a teaching situation (laboratory, lecture) or other student contact situation (counseling, library orientation, etc.) for at least fifty (50) minutes and an assessment of compliance with the evaluee's responsibilities as stated in the job description or, in the case of tenured faculty, options for "review" are defined in 5.5.2.2.