Performance Evaluation Meeting Sample Clauses
A Performance Evaluation Meeting clause establishes the requirement for periodic meetings to assess the progress and quality of work performed under an agreement. Typically, these meetings involve representatives from both parties who review deliverables, discuss any issues or delays, and set action items for improvement. The core function of this clause is to facilitate ongoing communication and accountability, ensuring that both parties remain aligned and that any performance concerns are addressed promptly.
Performance Evaluation Meeting. As directed by the Contracting Officer, the Contractor may be required to meet with the Government's representative monthly during the first two months of the contract. Thereafter, meetings will be as often as necessary at the discretion of the Contracting Officer. A mutual effort will be made to resolve all problems identified. The written minutes of these meetings, prepared by the Government, shall be signed by the Contractor's representative and the Government's representative. Should the Contractor not concur with the minutes, the Contractor shall state, in writing, to the Contracting Officer any areas of disagreement within five calendar days.
Performance Evaluation Meeting. The Consultant shall be readily available to meet with representatives of the City of San Diego weekly during the first month of the contract and as often as necessary thereafter for the purpose of evaluating Consultant’s performance on the Contract. A mutual effort will be made to resolve any and all performance problems identified at these meetings.
Performance Evaluation Meeting. The supervisor/manager will meet with the employee to discuss the performance evaluation. The employee shall sign the formal performance evaluation to acknowledge its contents and that they have met with their supervisor/manager to discuss the evaluation. The employee’s signature shall not mean that he or she endorses the contents of the evaluation. The employee may comment on the evaluation in a written statement, which will then be placed with the evaluation in the employee’s personnel file. The written statement must be submitted within ten (10) working days after the employee receives the evaluation. A request for reconsideration of the evaluation may be made utilizing steps one and two of the Grievance Procedure in Article 26. Steps three and four of Article 26’s Grievance Procedure shall not be applicable to performance evaluations. An employee does not have the right to appeal. Any employee receiving a “Not Meeting Expectations” rating will be given a time period of ninety (90) days to bring their performance up to a “Meets Expectations” level or they will be subject to further disciplinary action up to and including termination. Any merit increases awarded as part of a performance evaluation will take effect on the first pay period following January 31st, or, if applicable, the date of the completion of their probationary period. Merit Increases shall be as follows: Exceeds Expectations: 2-Step Increase Meets Expectations: 1-Step Increase Not Meeting Expectations: No Increase
Performance Evaluation Meeting. Performance evaluations shall be considered confidential. The 48 evaluator shall not belong to the classified bargaining unit. 49
Performance Evaluation Meeting. Performance evaluations shall be considered confidential. 46 The evaluator shall not belong to the classified bargaining unit.
48 16.02.1 Unit members will be given no less than two (2) working days of notice prior to 49 any scheduled evaluation meeting with the evaluator.
51 16.02.2 Unit members will be provided with a copy of their completed evaluation a 52 minimum of two (2) working days prior to the evaluation meeting. This 53 provides the unit member an opportunity to review the evaluation and identify 54 any areas of concern, which may then be discussed with the evaluator during 1 the performance evaluation meeting.
3 16.02.3 The unit member and evaluator shall sign one (1) copy of the performance 4 evaluation form at the end of their meeting. The unit member’s signature 5 acknowledges receipt of the evaluation. Signing the performance evaluation 6 form does not constitute the unit member’s agreement with the performance 7 evaluation. The evaluator shall provide the unit member with a copy of the 8 evaluation.
10 16.02.4 Evaluators shall forward the completed performance evaluation form to Human 11 Resources within five (5) working days of the evaluation meeting.
Performance Evaluation Meeting. The contract manager shall be required to meet with the Contracting Officer and/or his/her representative on an as required basis. There should be no more than one meeting per month.
Performance Evaluation Meeting a) The issuance of a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) may be cause for the scheduling of a meeting among the Contractor, Contracting Officer, and the Contracting Officer Representative. A mutual effort will be made to resolve all problems identified. The Government will prepare written minutes of the meeting. The Contractor, Contracting Officer, and the Contracting Officer Representative will sign minutes of the meeting (s).
b) Should the Contractor not concur with the minutes, he will state in writing to the Contracting Officer within ten calendar days any areas he does not concur and explain the reasons for non-concurrence. The Contracting Officer will review and consider the reasons submitted for the Contractor's non-concurrence and make a decision. The Contracting Officer will notify the Contractor of the decision in writing within ten calendar days.