Program for Improvement Clause Samples

Program for Improvement. A program for improvement will be developed and will include the specific evaluative criteria which must be met and the measures and benchmarks which will be used to determine the teacher’s success or failure. The program will include a system for periodic feedback during the term of probation, supports provided and funded by the District, and the dates those supports will be put in place.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Program for Improvement. 9.10.1 Any Member who receives a “Does Not Meet Standards/Unsatisfactory or a Partially Meets Standards for three consecutive years per Article 9.8.1” rating on any element of the written Summative Evaluation, or as an overall rating on the written Summative Evaluation shall be required to participate in a formal Program for Improvement (“PFI”) designed to improve the appropriate areas of the Member’s substandard performance. 9.10.2 The PFI may be initiated at any time following receipt by the Member of the written Summative Evaluation and shall last at least eighty (80) of the Member’s school days (work days if 12-month employee). The Member shall be notified of the designated length of the initial PFI period. 9.10.3 The PFI shall include the following: 9.10.3.1 Notification to the Member shall be required to participate in a PFI as described in Article 9.9. 9.10.3.2 A meeting is held between the evaluator and the Member at which the PFI is presented to and reviewed with the Member. 9.10.3.3 A specific program to improve substandard areas of the Member’s performance designed by a committee consisting of the evaluator, Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources, and resource persons designated by the evaluator and/or the Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources. Members may be used as a resource, but they will not serve on the committee and are specifically excluded from participation in any evaluation of another Member or in making recommendations for dismissal procedures. 9.10.4 As part of the PFI, the Member will be formally observed by the evaluator at least once every twenty (20) school days. Each formal observation shall be preceded by a Pre-Observation Conference (Article 9. 7.2.1) and followed by a Post-Observation Conference, held as soon as possible after the observation. These observations will occur for at least a period of eighty (80) of the Member’s school/work days. In the Post-Observation conference, the evaluator will present specific details regarding areas in which improvement has been demonstrated by the Member and areas in which improvement is necessary. Suggestions for improvement will be given to the Member. 9.10.5 Whenever necessary, a memorandum documenting the evaluator’s specific concerns regarding the Member’s performance and specific suggestions for improvement will be given to the Member while the Member is participating in the PFI. 9.10.6 During this period of no less than eighty (80) school/work days, the Assistant Sup...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Program for Improvement. The program for improvement shall include a description of what performance standards of the employee will be acceptable to remediate the deficiencies, suggestions for achieving the performance standards, and such other matters as the evaluator deems appropriate.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Program for Improvement. At any time after October 15, a certificated classroom teacher whose work is not judged satisfactory based on district evaluation criteria on the Summative Evaluation of Practice document (Form F) will be given a written notice of deficiency that lists specific areas of deficiencies and provides a reasonable program for improvement. For certificated classroom teachers who have been transitioned to the revised evaluation system, the following summative performance ratings mean that his/her work is not judged satisfactory: 1. Level 1: (Unsatisfactory) – Receiving a summative score of 1 is not considered satisfactory performance for all teachers. 2. Level 2: (Basic) - if the classroom teacher is a continuing contract employee under RCW 28A.405.210 with more than five years of teaching experience and if the Level 2 rating has been received for two consecutive years or for two years with in a consecutive three year time period.
View Source

Related to Program for Improvement

  • Payment for Improvements If payment is made directly to contractors, Tenant shall (i) comply with Landlord's requirements for final lien releases and waivers in connection with Tenant's payment for work to contractors, and (ii) sign Landlord's standard contractor's rules and regulations. If Tenant orders any work directly from Landlord, Tenant shall pay to Landlord an amount equal to five percent of the cost of such work to compensate Landlord for all overhead, general conditions, fees and other costs and expenses arising from Landlord's involvement with such work. If Tenant does not order any work directly from Landlord, Tenant shall reimburse Landlord for Landlord's reasonable, actual, out-of-pocket costs and expenses actually incurred in connection with Landlord's review of such work.

  • School Improvement The parties do hereby mutually agree that the school improvement process currently in effect will continue. Any plan developed by the committees shall not be in conflict with the master agreement or board policy.

  • Needs Improvement the Educator’s performance on a standard or overall is below the requirements of a standard or overall, but is not considered to be unsatisfactory at this time. Improvement is necessary and expected.

  • Improvement Plan A detailed, written plan initiated by the evaluator. The teacher may provide input at the meeting to review the plan. Improvement plans are utilized when a teacher receives an Evaluation Rating of Ineffective or when an administrator utilizes discretion to place any teacher on an improvement plan at any time based on any individual deficiency in the evaluation system. The approved form for the Improvement Plan is attached to this agreement as Appendix A-9.

  • Public Improvements To the best knowledge of the Transferor Partnership, there are no written or proposed plans to widen, modify, or realign any street or highway or any existing or proposed eminent domain proceedings which would affect the Property in any way whatsoever. To the best knowledge of the Transferor Partnership, there are no presently planned public improvements which would result in the creation of a special improvement or similar lien upon the Property.