QUALIFICATION AND EVALUATION CRITERIA Clause Samples

QUALIFICATION AND EVALUATION CRITERIA. 31.1 Post-qualification will be based on meeting all of the following minimum point scale criteria regarding the Applicant’s general and particular experience, personnel and equipment capabilities as well as financial position. The Employer reserves the right to waive minor deviations, if they do not materially affect the capacity of an applicant to perform the contract. Subcontractor’s experience and resources shall not be taken into account in determining the Applicant’s compliance with qualifying criteria. 31.2 The Employer reserves the right to accept or reject any tender, and to annul the tendering process and reject all tenders, at any time prior to award of Contract, without thereby incurring any liability to the affected tenderers or any obligation to inform the affected tenderers of the grounds for the Employer’s action

QUALIFICATION AND EVALUATION CRITERIA. The following criteria was required to be submitted by each proposer: submit evidence on the ability to treat or to obtain a permit/license/authorization to treat or recycle RCRA, radioactive, or TSCA contaminated wastes; have experience directly associated with the handling of low-level radioactive, mixed or hazardous waste and the transportation of same; submit a process description sufficient to allow ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Company a thorough understanding of the process to be utilized in treating the waste; have a management plan which is sufficient for ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Company to thoroughly understand how the project will be managed and includes an estimated project schedule, a project management system description, and a plan for coordinating with ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Company; because of the likelihood that a bidder may not have in place all permits, recycling exemptions, and licenses, or have the facilities, systems, and equipment needed to treat and process all waste in a category, the bidder was required to complete and submit a Treatment Milestone Schedule and fully describe the actions required to meet this milestone schedule and start First Article Test (FAT) treatment of the awarded waste by the required date; submit a health and safety plan; have a satisfactory record in environmental, health and safety matters; supply requested NEPA documentation. The implementation schedule calls for the completion of an environmental critique process, M&O/M&I audits of each treatment vendor after award, the development of environmental impact statements (EIS) or environmental assessments (EA), the successful completion of a FAT, and adequate characterization of legacy waste to the treatment vendor’s WAC. The NEPA environmental critique process is described in 10 CFR 1021.216 and began prior to issuance of the request for proposal (RFP) with initial stakeholder meetings and the development of environmental checklists and templates. ▇▇▇ will publish the environmental critique synopsis that will briefly describe the results of the NEPA screening and review of the proposed action. Stakeholders will be allowed to comment on the synopsis and a determination will be made on the level of NEPA review. The contracts awarded as a result of this procurement are contingent upon completion of the NEPA process by DOE. A two year limit with respect to completion of NEPA requirements has been placed on the awards. If NEPA requirements have not been completed within this two year time peri...

QUALIFICATION AND EVALUATION CRITERIA. Section A - Qualification Criteria

QUALIFICATION AND EVALUATION CRITERIA. 1. To accept or reject the tender is the responsibility of the Tender Committee, decision of which shall be final. 2. Each tenderer must meet and properly prove the following qualification criteria with relevant documentation  Technical proposal describing proposed methodology for monitoring services according requirements in article I. Scope of tender and listing past experience of the tenderer together with at least two references from past customers from the non-profit sector (with contact details for verification) - From this document, the following elements have to be assessable: - Conducting monitoring - Knowledge of relevant sector / thematic area - Knowledge of geographic area / country / region - Use of participatory methods - Sampling strategy and sample size - Addressing gender (in data collection/ sampling and in monitoring team) - Data analysis - Number of field research and desk research days  Writing example of report published by tenderer covering similar sectors in an emergency context  Financial proposal budget for each type of assignment in USD, including any applicable fees and taxes (unit pricelist)  Sworn eligibility statement (▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇) – filled and signed/stamped  General information on the Tenderer (▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) – filled and signed/stamped  Authorization to engage in business activities in the respective field 3. The tender evaluation committee will evaluate and award the contract on the basis of the following evaluation criteria  Professional expertise and past experience of the tenderer in the relevant field (quality of technical proposal)- 60% - Conducting monitoring - Knowledge of relevant sector / thematic area - Knowledge of geographic area / country / region - Use of participatory methods - Sampling strategy and sample size - Addressing gender (in data collection/ sampling and in monitoring team) - Data analysis - Number of field research and desk research days  Reputation in this context (references) – 10% - Respect for organisational confidentiality - Independence of field enumerators - Experience of analysists - Experience of data collectors  Price for the assignments for whole duration of framework agreement (as per financial proposal, including any applicable taxes and fees) – 30% 4. Evaluation method (performance of evaluation criteria):  Professional expertise and past experience of the tenderer in the relevant field (quality of technical proposal)- 60% PIN expert evaluation committee will assign up to 5 point...