Recommended Alternative Sample Clauses

The "Recommended Alternative" clause identifies and specifies an alternative product, service, or method that is suggested in place of the originally proposed option. In practice, this clause is used when the original item is unavailable, unsuitable, or does not meet certain requirements, and it provides a clear substitute that has been vetted or approved by the recommending party. Its core function is to streamline decision-making and maintain project momentum by offering a pre-approved backup, thereby reducing delays and ensuring that all parties are aligned on acceptable alternatives.
Recommended Alternative. The ultimate goal of the Collaborative Effort is to build agreement, to the extent possible, around a “recommended alternative” that identifies modes of travel, transportation improvements and mechanisms to protect or mitigate impacts to environmental, community and economic health and prosperity. The lead agencies of the I-70 Mountain Corridor PEIS are responsible for identifying and selecting a “preferred alternative”. Ideally, the recommended alternative and the preferred alternative will be identical. Lead agencies cannot delegate their responsibilities regarding decision making and selecting a preferred alternative. However, as equal and participating members of the Collaborative Effort, lead agencies are committed to crafting with all stakeholders a recommended alternative that can be supportive and consistent with a recommended alternative.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Recommended Alternative. The Collaborative Effort’s agreement on a recommended alternative shall provide the basis for ongoing discussions of the Collaborative Effort Lead agencies cannot delegate their responsibilities regarding decision making. However, as equal and participating members of the Collaborative Effort, lead agencies are committed to crafting with all stakeholders decisions that can be supportive and consistent with the recommended alternative.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Recommended Alternative. No reasonable action alternatives to the proposed project have been identified for assessment (see section III.B). Based on our independent review and evaluation of the proposed project, the proposed project with our enhancement measures, and the no- action alternatives, we have selected the proposed project, with our recommended enhancement measures, as the preferred option. We recommend this option because the net benefits of the project outweigh the consequences associated with taking no action.
View Source
Recommended Alternative. The recommended alternative is the Riprap Alternative. The repair of damages will be a total of 400 linear feet. The repair will require re- grading the eroded bank to a more stable slope, placing a wedge of class IV riprap on a 2H:1 V slope in the eroded section of the embankment. The entire slope will be covered with a 3 FT thick blanket of class IV riprap and the riprap will be covered with a 1FT lift of soil above the OHWL and hydroseeded. This alternative offers the least expensive repair and the best solution to the repair of levee damage, while considering the pre -flood condition. The levee repair will be tied into the levee upstream and downstream at the same slope grade. All bank protection material will consist of clean, non - contaminated material. ADDITIONAL WORK TO BE COMPLETED In addition to the recommended alternatives for site A and site B, work will also include removal of trees within 12 feet of floodwalls within the project area to comply with recent Corps of Engineers guidance. There are 112 trees to be removed, all on the left bank between the South Boeing Bridge and the ▇▇▇▇▇ Avenue Bridge. This work is a Corps requirement pursuant to review of the floodwall performance at New Orleans, and will be funded at 100% Federal cost.
View Source
Recommended Alternative. Describe the recommended alternative, including the types of improvements, project limits, and project benefits. Develop a work schedule for completing the design phase and estimate the duration of the construction phase.
View Source

Related to Recommended Alternative

  • Alternative Proposals Prior to the Effective Date, the Company agrees (a) that neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries shall, and it and they shall direct and use its and their best efforts to cause its and their respective officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives (including, without limitation, any investment banker, attorney or accountant retained by it or any of its Subsidiaries) not to, initiate, solicit or encourage, directly or indirectly, any inquiries or the making or implementation of any proposal or offer (including, without limitation, any proposal or offer to its stockholders) with respect to a merger, acquisition, consolidation or similar transaction involving, or any purchase of all or any significant portion of the assets or any equity securities of, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (any such proposal or offer made prior to the termination of this Agreement (and any subsequent amended proposal or offer made by the same or an affiliated party) being hereinafter referred to as an "Alternative Proposal") or engage in any negotiations concerning, or provide any confidential information or data to, or have any discussions with, any person relating to an Alternative Proposal, or release any third party from any obligations under any existing standstill agreement or arrangement relating to any Alternative Proposal, or otherwise facilitate any effort or attempt to make or implement an Alternative Proposal; (b) that it will immediately cease and cause to be terminated any existing activities, discussions or negotiations with any parties conducted heretofore with respect to any of the foregoing, and it will take the necessary steps to inform the individuals or entities referred to above of the obligations undertaken in this Section 8.9; and (c) that it will notify Parent immediately if any such inquiries or proposals are received by, any such information is requested from, or any such negotiations or discussions are sought to be initiated or continued with, it; provided, however, that nothing contained in this Section 8.9 shall prohibit the Board of Directors of the Company from (i) furnishing information to or entering into discussions or negotiations with, any person or entity that makes or proposes to make an unsolicited bona fide proposal to acquire the Company pursuant to a merger, consolidation, share exchange, purchase of a substantial portion of assets, business combination or other similar transaction, if, and only to the extent that, (A) the Board of Directors of the Company determines in good faith that such action is required for the Board of Directors to comply with its fiduciary duties to stockholders imposed by law, (B) prior to furnishing such information to, or entering into discussions or negotiations with, such person or entity, the Company provides written 37 43 notice to Parent to the effect that it is furnishing information to, or entering into discussions or negotiations with, such person or entity and (C) the Company keeps Parent promptly informed of the status and all material terms and conditions of any such discussions or negotiations (including identities of parties); and (ii) to the extent applicable, complying with Rule 14e-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act with regard to an Alternative Proposal. Nothing in this Section 8.9 shall (x) permit the Company to terminate this Agreement (except as specifically provided in Article X hereof), (y) permit the Company to enter into any agreement with respect to an Alternative Proposal during the term of this Agreement (it being agreed that during the term of this Agreement, the Company shall not enter into any agreement with any person that provides for, or in any way facilitates, an Alternative Proposal), or (z) affect any other obligation of the Company under this Agreement.

  • Leasing or Alternative Financing Methods The procurement and other applicable laws of some Purchasing Entities may permit the use of leasing or alternative financing methods for the acquisition of Products under this Master Agreement. Where the terms and conditions are not otherwise prescribed in an applicable Participating Addendum, the terms and conditions for leasing or alternative financing methods are subject to negotiation between the Contractor and Purchasing Entity.

  • Alternative The provisions of Paragraph 5 will apply.

  • Loss Mitigation and Consideration of Alternatives (i) For each Single Family Shared-Loss Loan in default or for which a default is reasonably foreseeable, the Assuming Institution shall undertake reasonable and customary loss mitigation efforts, in accordance with any of the following programs selected by Assuming Institution in its sole discretion, Exhibit 5 (FDIC Mortgage Loan Modification Program), the United States Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program Guidelines or any other modification program approved by the United States Treasury Department, the Corporation, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any other governmental agency (it being understood that the Assuming Institution can select different programs for the various Single Family Shared-Loss Loans) (such program chosen, the “Modification Guidelines”). After selecting the applicable Modification Guideline for each such Single Family Shared-Loss Loan, the Assuming Institution shall document its consideration of foreclosure, loan restructuring under the applicable Modification Guideline chosen, and short-sale (if short-sale is a viable option) alternatives and shall select the alternative the Assuming Institution believes, based on its estimated calculations, will result in the least Loss. If unemployment or underemployment is the primary cause for default or for which a default is reasonably foreseeable, the Assuming Institution may consider the borrower for a temporary forbearance plan which reduces the loan payment to an affordable level for at least six (6) months. (ii) Losses on Home Equity Loans shall be shared under the charge-off policies of the Assuming Institution’s Examination Criteria as if they were Single Family Shared-Loss Loans. (iii) Losses on Investor-Owned Residential Loans shall be treated as Restructured Loans, and with the consent of the Receiver can be restructured under terms separate from the Exhibit 5 standards. Please refer to Exhibits 2(a)(1)-(2) for guidance in Calculation of Loss for Restructured Loans. Losses on Investor-Owned Residential Loans will be treated as if they were Single Family Shared-Loss Loans. (iv) The Assuming Institution shall retain its loss calculations for the Shared Loss Loans and such calculations shall be provided to the Receiver upon request. For the avoidance of doubt and notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (x) the Assuming Institution is not required to modify or restructure any Shared-Loss Loan on more than one occasion and (y) the Assuming Institution is not required to consider any alternatives with respect to any Shared-Loss Loan in the process of foreclosure as of the Bank Closing if the Assuming Institution can document that a loan modification is not cost effective and shall be entitled to continue such foreclosure measures and recover the Foreclosure Loss as provided herein, and (z) the Assuming Institution shall have a transition period of up to 90 days after Bank Closing to implement the Modification Guidelines, during which time, the Assuming Institution may submit claims under such guidelines as may be in place at the Failed Bank.

  • RECOMMENDED ACTION It is respectfully requested that the Procurement Committee approve an Addendum to the Continuing Program and Project Management Services Agreement with AECOM Technical Services, Inc. for the services contained herein and the amount as shown below: AAC – Compliance Review Date 7/26/23 AAC – Funding Eligibility Review Date 7/26/23 Attachment A: Finance Form Attachment B: OSBD Memo FINANCE FORM Date: Requestor’s Name: Preparer’s Name: Requestor’s Department: Description: Vendor: 7/12/2023 ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Construction Sustainable Mgt Plan AECOM Requestor’s Extension: Preparer’s Extension: Solicitation #: Contract # / Name: Procurement Committee Date: Agenda Item #: 2465 4159 Continuing Program and Management 08.01.2023 NON-PROJECT FUNDS: O&M 301.713.170.5310009.000.000000 $31,022.00 Total Requisition: $31,022.00 Requisition Number: 94653 To: Members of the Procurement Committee From: ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇. Small Business Administrator Date: August 01, 2023 Re: Request for Approval of an Addendum to the Continuing Program and Project Management Services Agreement with AECOM Technical Services, Inc. for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Development of the GOAA Sustainability Management and Resiliency Plan at the Orlando International Airport We have reviewed the qualifications of the subject contract's MWBE/LDB/VBE specifications and determined that AECOM Technical Services, Inc. proposes 99% MWBE participation on this addendum. Our analysis indicates that AECOM Technical Services, Inc. is eligible for award of the subject addendum. Name of Airport: Orlando International Airport Telephone No: (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Address: ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Boulevard, Orlando, FL 32827 Project Name & Number: