STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Clause Samples

The Statewide Contract Management System clause establishes the requirement for using a centralized, standardized system to manage contracts across all state agencies. This clause typically mandates that all contracts, amendments, and related documents be entered and tracked within the designated system, ensuring consistency and transparency in contract administration. By centralizing contract management, the clause helps streamline oversight, reduce administrative errors, and promote accountability throughout the contract lifecycle.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Contractor under this Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this section shall apply. Contractor agrees to be governed by and comply with the provisions of §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, and ▇▇- ▇▇▇-▇▇▇, C.R.S. regarding the monitoring of vendor performance and the reporting of contract information in the State’s contract management system (“Contract Management System” or “CMS”). Contractor’s performance shall be subject to evaluation and review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, Colorado statutes governing CMS, and State Fiscal Rules and State Controller policies.
STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Local Agency under this Agreement is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 shall apply. Local Agency agrees to be governed by and comply with the provisions of §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ C.R.S. regarding the monitoring of vendor performance and the reporting of contract performance information in the State’s contract management system (“Contract Management System” or “CMS”). Local Agency’s performance shall be subject to evaluation and review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Colorado statutes governing CMS, and State Fiscal Rules and State Controller policies.
STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and prohibit Grantee from bidding on future Grants. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.
STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder is $100,000 or higher]
STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Agreement is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this section shall apply. Grantee agrees to be governed by and comply with the provisions of §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, and ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇,
STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Contractor under this Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this §Statewide Contract Management System applies. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Contractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Department of Transportation and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation or (b) by exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201, 202, or 204, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, ...
STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Construction Manager under this Contract is $500,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this section shall apply. Construction Manager agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of C.R.S. §▇▇- ▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, and §24-105- 201 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Construction Manager understands that if the maximum amount payable to Construction Manager under this Contract is $500,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, the State shall have the additional responsibility to prepare a Contractor Performance Evaluation Report,. This Report shall be maintained as part of the Contractor’s file and remain part of CMS for at least 5-years following the Report date. Construction Manager’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including C.R.S §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Construction Manager’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Construction Manager’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Construction Manager’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Construction Manager’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Construction Manager shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Construction Manager demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director)...
STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Architect/Engineer under this Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this section shall apply. Architect/Engineer agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 24-103.5-101, ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, and ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Architect/Engineer’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including C.R.S 24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Architect/Engineer’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Architect/Engineer’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Architect/Engineer’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Architect/Engineer’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Architect/Engineer shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Architect/Engineer demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Principal Representative, and showing of good cause, may debar Architect/Engineer and prohibit Architect/Engineer from bidding on future contracts. Architect/Engineer may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS 24-105- 102(6)), or (b) under CRS 24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, ...
STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to State under this Agreement is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this section shall apply. County agrees to be governed by and comply with the provisions of §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, and ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, C.R.S. regarding the monitoring of vendor performance and the reporting of contract performance information in the State’s contract management system (“Contract Management System” or “CMS”). County’s performance shall be subject to evaluation and review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Colorado statutes governing CMS, and State Fiscal Rules and State Controller Policies.
STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to County under this Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this §16 shall apply. County agrees to be governed by and comply with the provisions of §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇,