Tie Scores Clause Samples

The Tie Scores clause establishes the procedure to follow when two or more parties achieve the same score in a competitive context, such as a contest, evaluation, or bidding process. Typically, this clause outlines the specific method for breaking the tie, which may include additional rounds of competition, predetermined tiebreaker criteria, or even splitting a prize or opportunity among the tied parties. Its core practical function is to ensure fairness and transparency by providing a clear and agreed-upon method for resolving situations where participants are otherwise indistinguishable based on their scores.
Tie Scores. In applying seniority under this Agreement, if it is found that two (2) or more employees in the university have equal seniority, preference shall be given in order of greatest length of continuous OUS service. If this method does not break the tie, then the greatest length of continuous service in the university shall be used. If ties between employees still exist, the order of preference shall be determined by the university in such manner as to conserve for the university the services of the most qualified employee.
View SourceView Similar (24)
Tie Scores. 1. If two (2) or more employees have equal service credit within the same geographic area, the order of layoff shall be in inverse of the greatest length of continuous State service. 2. If the first method does not break the tie, the employee with the least length of continuous service in the OMD (including the prior time in the bargaining unit at the State Police) shall be scheduled for layoff. 3. Should a tie between employees still exist, the order of layoff shall be at the discretion of the appointing authority.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Tie Scores. If it is found that two (2) or more employees in the university/college in which the layoff is to be made have equal seniority, the order of layoff shall be in inverse order of the greatest length of continuous OUS service. If this does not break the tie, then the greatest length of continuous service in the university/college shall be used. If ties between employees still exist, the order of layoff shall be determined by the university/college in such manner as to conserve for the university/college the services of the most qualified employee.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Tie Scores. In applying seniority under this Agreement, if it is found that two (2) or more employees have equal seniority, preference shall be given in order of greatest length of service as a Police Officer. If this method does not break the tie, then the greatest length of continuous service in the University shall be used. If ties between employees still exist, the order of preference shall be determined by the University in such manner as to conserve for the University the services of the most qualified employee.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Tie Scores. If two or more applications have the same score and there are insufficient funds to select all
View Source
Tie Scores. If it is found that two (2) or more employees in the university in which the layoff is to be made have equal seniority, the order of layoff shall be in inverse order of the greatest length
View Source
Tie Scores. When promotions are to be made, and two or more employees are found to be equal as a result of promotional examinations conducted by the City, the employee with the greatest length of service with the City shall receive the promotion.
View Source

Related to Tie Scores

  • FICO Scores Each Mortgage Loan has a non-zero FICO score;

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.

  • HOEPA No Mortgage Loan is (a) subject to the provisions of the Homeownership and Equity Protection Act of 1994 as amended (“HOEPA”), (b) a “high cost” mortgage loan, “covered” mortgage loan, “high risk home” mortgage loan, or “predatory” mortgage loan or any other comparable term, no matter how defined under any federal, state or local law, (c) subject to any comparable federal, state or local statutes or regulations, or any other statute or regulation providing for heightened regulatory scrutiny or assignee liability to holders of such mortgage loans, or (d) a High Cost Loan or Covered Loan, as applicable (as such terms are defined in the current Standard & Poor’s LEVELS® Glossary Revised, Appendix E).

  • Statistical, Demographic or Market-Related Data All statistical, demographic or market-related data included in the Registration Statement, the Disclosure Package or the Prospectus are based on or derived from sources that the Company believes to be reliable and accurate and all such data included in the Registration Statement, the Disclosure Package or the Prospectus accurately reflects the materials upon which it is based or from which it was derived.