Timeline and Budget Clause Samples

Timeline and Budget. With regard to the timeline and budget, the Specific Criteria Review Factors asked reviewers to make a number of determinations including if these sections and materials were detailed enough to convey the sequence of the program and how funds would be expended. Specifically, the timeline and the budget must tell the same story as the proposal narrative. Reviewers ranked the proposal timeline and budget as sufficiently detailed; however, some areas for improvement were noted. It was specifically indicated that the footnotes described budget items that may not be clear. While the majority of program costs are related to technology, there were no explanations for certain miscellaneous or contingency expenses. The detailed budget did include all items asked of the funding source, shows all items paid for by other sources; and, appears sufficient to accomplish the tasks described in the narrative. One reviewer‘s comments indicated that: ―The budget gives a very detailed explanation of all costs. The majority of the expense results from implementing Voxiva‘s SMS software products. The large capital outlay is understandable and expected given Voxiva‘s products and history.‖ Another reviewer indicated that ‖No plan was presented regarding how the program could be continued beyond three years.‖ Comments of this nature were also noted in the significance and overall impact scoring. Other comments regarding the Specific Scored Criteria included: Giving specific information on the LBWB incidence rate Consider elaborating on ―social media‖ The information on the Cover Page may be too brief. Consider providing more information describing the applicant‘s agency programs, activities, purposes and goals. More data is specifically needed on teen LBWB. Need more specifics about outcomes and impact of previous initiatives by all partners. Provides quotes/endorsements in support of accomplishments. Consider more information on current interventions to address these problems. There is a statement that enhancements are needed to current interventions then the next sentence says current interventions have reached a plateau and that new interventions are needed. Which is it? Is this project an enhancement or is it new? The narrative says emotional and physical health will be improved. There are some indirect measures of physical health (weight gain, smoking) but nothing related to emotional health. Perhaps the definition of ―health‖ both physical and emotional could be elaborated ...

Timeline and Budget. Contractor must complete all deliverables within the agreed-upon schedule and within the limits provided by the executed contract.

Timeline and Budget. Budget details may vary for each individual submission. The current provided budget assumptions were based upon data provided by the Augusta Health Start program (courtesy of ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2010). Consideration should be given to negotiating with Voxiva. While the majority of program costs are related to technology, personnel, overhead, and miscellaneous expenses may vary significantly.

Timeline and Budget. The consultant portion of this project is scheduled to begin on or around September 12th, 2022 with a final close date of June 31, 2023. A maximum of $200,000 is available for this contract. The estimated budget for the scope of work described in the following section is $200,000. Contractor will invoice WDFW upon completion of each deliverable. Scope of Work Summary: Protecting and restoring habitat and mitigating movement barriers are highly effective but costly conservation actions, requiring managers to be strategic in where they implement them to deliver the greatest and most enduring benefits with limited resources. However, managers are challenged to optimally site these actions, in part, because the data currently available to inform regional spatial prioritization is increasingly becoming outdated given recent widespread disturbances (e.g., wildfire and human development). Further, the potential risk of climate change (e.g., species range shifts) to diminish the future value of implementation investments is presently unknown. This lack of an up-to-date, climate-aware, regional-scale perspective hinders achievement of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ conservation goals for at-risk species, particularly in highly dynamic landscapes like the several ecoregions within Washington. This project will expand TerrAdapt in a way to addresses this knowledge gap by continuously providing managers with timely and actionable priorities for where to implement based on recent trends, current conditions, and projected future risks. The contractor will perform a series updates/expansions to an existing tool, TerrAdapt. TerrAdapt is a novel dynamic spatial decision support system (DSS) that uses the latest remote sensing, AI, and spatial analysis technologies powered by Google Earth Engine (GEE) to monitor habitat conditions, project future impacts of climate change, and continuously revise spatial priorities accordingly. With these updates/expansions, TerrAdapt will provide state-of-the art monitoring of habitat and connectivity for 5 species and 4 ecosystems based on cutting-edge remote sensing approaches and the latest climate models. Production of these models will be fully automated in the Google cloud, updating annually each fall. These products will be fully validated and documented and available to WDFW users via TerrAdapt’s web portal (including a map interface, dashboard, and download capabilities) and API.

Timeline and Budget. The work is expected to take place between September 2016 and October 2017. Alliance staff will periodically review progress on the drafts and provide feedback to the bidder. The final budget will be contingent on the scope of the proposed work. The payments will be linked to satisfactory completion of the deliverables.

Timeline and Budget. Timeline for Tasks 1-3 based on federal fiscal year where Q1 starts October 1 and Q4 ends September 30. Proposed work will begin after finalization of Joint Funding Agreement. Task FFY2020 FFY2021 FFY2022 Table 7. Budget summary for Tasks 1-3 FFY2020 FFY2021 FFY2022 Total Table 8. Contributing source funding for Tasks 1-3 FFY2020 FFY2021 FFY2022 Total * New Mexico Environment Department - Drinking Water Bureau Table 9. Budget summary for Task 4. FFY2021 Total Table 10. Timeline for Task 4 based on federal fiscal year where Q1 starts October 1 and Q4 ends September 30. Proposed work will begin after finalization of amended Joint Funding Agreement. Task FFY2021 FFY2022 Table 11. Contributing source funding for Task 4 FFY2021 Total * New Mexico Environment Department - Construction Programs Bureau Table 12. Budget summary for Task 5 FFY2021 Total Table 13. Timeline for Task 5 based on federal fiscal year where Q1 starts October 1 and Q4 ends September 30. Proposed work will begin after finalization of amended Joint Funding Agreement. Task FFY2021 FFY2022 Table 14. Contributing source funding for Task 5 FFY2021 Total * New Mexico Environment Department - Drinking Water Bureau Table 15. Budget summary for Task 6 FFY2021 FFY2022 Total Table 16. Timeline for Task 6 based on federal fiscal year where Q1 starts October 1 and Q4 ends September 30. Proposed work will begin after finalization of amended Joint Funding Agreement. Task FFY2021 FFY2022 Table 17. Contributing source funding for Task 6 FFY2021 FFY2022 Total * New Mexico Environment Department Experienced USGS Hydrologic Technicians who have taken the USGS Field Methods for Water Quality Sample Collection class will collect the surface water and groundwater samples. An experienced Hydrologist who specializes in water quality will oversee data collection and assist in groundwater site selection to ensure that relevant well depth, screened interval, and aquifer information are available for each sampling location. This Hydrologist will also partner with ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, and others at USGS who specialize in anthropogenic compounds during the analysis and interpretation of the data that will result in a USGS Scientific Investigations Report or Journal article. References ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇., 2010, Guidelines for the Use of the Semipermeable Membrane Device (SPMD) and the Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Sampler (POCIS) in Environmental Monitoring Studies: U.S. Geological Survey, Techniques and Methods 1...