Proposal Narrative Clause Samples

Proposal Narrative. This is the core of the proposal – it reinforces the goals, objectives and the desired outcomes of the project. It describes the activities of the project and who will participate in and implement these activities. It includes a timeline and may reference the method of evaluation.

Proposal Narrative. The proposal narrative description (25-40 pages) should describe each of the discrete projects or tasks proposed in the application. Each task should be titled and assigned a separate project or task number. Sufficient detail should be provided to enable reviewers to evaluate the relevance and applicability of proposed work to program priorities described in Section I.B. of this announcement; to determine the technical/scientific merit of the proposed work; to adequately review the qualifications of the applicants; and to assess whether the proposed scope of work raises any concerns with regard to Federal policy considerations, such as those related to the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Historic Preservation Act, etc. Applicants should clearly describe how each activity or project will directly benefit the coral reef management priorities of State and Territorial Coral Reef Management agencies. Each task description in the proposal narrative should include: (a) Introduction - Provide a brief summary of relevant background information that justifies the need for the proposed project or task. Clearly describe or explain: the relationship of the proposed project to previous efforts; how the project fits into the jurisdictions' strategies for addressing the issue; how the project would complement coral reef conservation activities of local governmental agencies, and, if applicable, other relevant CRCP-sponsored coral conservation activities. (b) Task Description and Methodology - Provide a project description that describes the scope and detail of the project and the work to be accomplished. Clearly describe or explain: project goals and objectives, proposed activities, methods, procedures, any special equipment that will be used in support of the project goals, and how project outcomes will directly result in improved management of coral reef resources. (c) Task Outcomes or Products - Identify and describe the anticipated project products or outcomes, explain how they will benefit local management of coral reef resources, and describe performance measures that will be used to evaluate project success. The narrative should include information on dissemination of the findings/results to resource managers, local communities, and other stakeholders as appropriate. The project narrative also needs to include information on how the project will be evaluated for success. If the goal of the project is to build capacity for improved...

Proposal Narrative. The applicant's proposal narrative is the primary evaluation document that is scored. For more information see specific category for narrative content requirements.

Proposal Narrative. The proposal narrative is the document that will be evaluated and scored by the review panel. The maximum score is 100 points. Please limit to no more than 3000 words (about 5 pages using Times New Roman 12 point), not including letters of support, tables, maps, budget, and diagrams:

Proposal Narrative. The proposal narrative is the document that will be evaluated and scored by the review panel. Total point value of 100 points possible. All proposals should be no more than 3000 words (about 5 pages using Times New Roman 12 point font and 1-inch margins) not including letters of support, tables, maps, and diagrams. Applicants are encouraged to work with State and Regional based Federal agency representative such as their USGS State Geospatial Liaison to develop proposals. For a listing of Liaisons please see ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/geospatial/#nogo. Please submit narratives that are responsive to the following instructions and are clearly and plainly stated. The narrative must also be focused on the planned activities and be concise, but described in sufficient detail to provide the reviewers with a full understanding of the project.

Proposal Narrative. A project description (proposal), as described in the application component section below, should be limited to no more than a total of 75 pages. The project description should also include a title page and a table of content but these pages (title and table of content) will not count towards the project description 75-page limit. For applications submitted in electronic format, acceptable formats are limited to Adobe Acrobat (.PDF) or Microsoft Word files. All application materials should use a legible 11- or 12-point font with 1-inch margins on all sides. Project descriptions that exceed the 75-page limit will be shortened by removing pages at the end of the proposal narrative (see elements a-c and 4. and 5. of the component section below) before it is forwarded to merit reviewers for evaluation. Pages excised from lengthy applications will not be reviewed or considered. Applications that are incomplete, unclear, or contain numerous typographical errors may not be understood effectively by reviewers, resulting in lower evaluation scores, so applicants are advised to review their application materials closely before they are submitted to the agency for consideration. Appendices should be limited to materials that directly support the main body of the proposal (e.g., resumes, references, lists of relevant work products or reports, detailed methodologies, data sources, detailed budget information, letters of collaboration, letters of support, lists of data sources, and maps). Applicants should paginate their proposal and any appendices. When attaching appendices, please keep in mind that the total ▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ electronic file size of the proposal narrative and appendices combined should not exceed 200 megabytes and much less is encouraged. Files that are larger may not be properly downloaded, uploaded, or received by the agency or the reviewers. Files that cannot be opened or downloaded will not be reviewed. Sufficient detail should be provided to enable reviewers to evaluate the relevance and applicability of proposed work to program priorities described in Section I.B. of this announcement; to determine the technical/scientific merit of the proposed work; to adequately review the qualifications of the applicants; and to assess whether the proposed scope of work raises any concerns with regard to Federal policy considerations, such as those related to the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act, Historic Preservation Act, and Marine Mammal ...

Proposal Narrative. The Proposal Narrative is limited to 15 single-spaced pages and must be developed using 12- point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. Clearly organize the Proposal Narrative using the following six sections. 1. Executive Summary (up to one single-spaced page) • This section is not scored, but should provide the Foundation and reviewers with an overview of the proposed activities and intended outcomes. • Provide the following on the Executive Summary page: i. Project title. ii. Requested funding amount. iii. Focus of the grant proposal: healthy eating, active living and/or tobacco prevention/cessation. iv. Brief narrative overview of the proposal. The Foundation will likely draw from this narrative overview when announcing grant awards.

Proposal Narrative. Scoring Criteria The narrative of your proposal should include clear and succinct responses to the questions in the following table titled Scoring Criteria. The narrative must clearly and concisely describe and justify each task presented in the proposal. A well-prepared application will address each question briefly, thoroughly, and pay specific attention to each of the points listed in the Scoring Criteria. Your narrative is limited to 15 pages including the Workplan Narrative. The narrative does not include the Application Cover Sheet, the Workplan Table, the Budget Table, letters of support, resumes or proof of non-profit status. The applicant is responsible for supplying sufficient detail for the review panel to fully evaluate the proposal. You must not assume the review panel knows anything about your organization or previous program experience. Attachments to support the proposal narrative that are NOT included in the fifteen (15) page limit, and include: · Application Cover Sheet (Appendix 1) · Resume(s) of at least three (3) Key Staff involved in the project, including the Project Lead. (Resumes limited to 2 pages double-sided maximum per individual) Attachments to support the proposal narrative that are NOT included in the fifteen (15) page limit, and include: · Letters of Support (if applicable) · Proof of Non-profit Status (if applicable) · Clearly respond to each question so that your response can stand alone and this makes it easier for the review panel to score your application. · Be clear and concise in application response. · Make sure the numbers add up in the budget. Reviewers lose confidence when the budget or estimates aren’t accurate.

Proposal Narrative. ‌ The City is seeking bids from entities sufficiently qualified, experienced and capable of providing the desired energy products. The following is a list of the City’s minimum requirements for the Proposal Narrative. • A description of the proposed products offered. • A description of the Respondent, its organization, key personnel, and operations, and provide similar information for any third parties that would be relied upon to provide the proposed services. If the Respondent is a Joint Venture (“JV”), include a description of the organization, relationships, and defined responsibilities of all Partners in the JV and any previous project-specific associations of the JV Partners. • A description of Respondent’s overall ability and qualifications to deliver the energy products described in the bid, including descriptions of power purchase agreements which are generally similar to those addressed in the Respondent’s bid. • A demonstration of the Respondent’s financial viability by providing access to the following documentation: o Audited financial statements from the previous two years and a recent quarterly financial report (or a web link where such information is accessible). o If available, the credit rating history of the Respondent (or its guarantor) for the previous two years from two of the following: Standard & Poor’s, ▇▇▇▇▇’▇, or Fitch Investor Services. o If the Respondent’s (or its guarantor’s) credit rating is below investment grade (below BBB-/Baa3), or falls below investment grade during the contract term, confirmation that the Respondent will provide equivalent credit support for the duration of the contract through cash collateral, a letter of credit, a first or second lien on the generating facilit(ies) or an alternative equivalent credit mechanism. • A description of the assumptions for credit support that underlie Respondent’s proposal. This description should summarize Sellers expectations/requirements for Buyer’s collateral posting. For example, Respondent should state whether the collateral posting is expected to cover the entire monthly payment or only the termination payment amount, and whether the collateral posting requirement will be capped at a fixed amount. This description will be used to estimate the SFPUC’s cost of credit support for each Respondent’s proposal.