Traffic Operational Analysis Clause Samples

The Traffic Operational Analysis clause defines the requirement for conducting a study to assess the impact of a project or development on existing traffic patterns and infrastructure. Typically, this involves evaluating current traffic volumes, forecasting future conditions, and recommending improvements or mitigation measures if necessary. By mandating such an analysis, the clause ensures that potential traffic congestion or safety issues are identified and addressed early in the planning process, thereby supporting informed decision-making and minimizing negative effects on transportation systems.
Traffic Operational Analysis. 6.1. Perform peak hour traffic operational analyses for all scenarios in scope item 4.1 and for all the project intersections in scope item 1 using Synchro traffic modeling software. Evaluate the project intersections under the following traffic conditions and roadway configurations: a. Existing Conditions (current roadway configuration, current year traffic conditions) b. Event No‐Build Conditions (current roadway configuration, traffic conditions during the USGA Senior Open event) c. Event Build Conditions (improved roadway configuration, traffic conditions during the USGA Senior Open event) 6.2. Perform a peak hour traffic sensitivity analysis to determine the effects of small traffic volume fluctuations on intersection capacity. 6.3. Provide software outputs detailing intersection and individual movement performance factors including level of service, total delay, volume to capacity ratio, 95th percentile queue lengths, and any other critical intersection operational data. 6.4. Identify delay/LOS deficiencies and queueing deficiencies for scenarios in scope item 6.1. 6.5. Evaluate bicycle and pedestrian traffic concerns given the expected increase in traffic due to the event. 6.6. Complete conceptual traffic signal warrant analyses at two (2) intersections for the Event No‐build scenario in scope item 6. 1. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate and identify the need for added traffic control due to additional event traffic, including police enforcement. 6.7. Determine the changes to lane configuration, signal phasing, and signal timing needed to appropriately accommodate the additional event traffic.
View Source
Traffic Operational Analysis. The task will identify the area type, traffic conditions, and analysis tools that will be used for operational analysis. The following will be covered under this task:
View Source
Traffic Operational Analysis. The Engineer shall perform operational analysis for the existing conditions as well as proposed condition for US 54 from the ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Bridge to the US54/US 87 intersection. The Engineer shall develop VISSIM traffic models for the existing conditions and the 3-lane configuration for the existing and design year traffic. The following tasks shall be completed for the operational analysis: a. Existing Conditions Analysis. Existing condition intersections models (up to 6 intersections identified in the turning movement count list) shall be developed using Synchro® software for US 54 for both AM and PM peak hour. The existing traffic count data (and geometry information from the field review shall be used for developing the VISSIM model. The following existing VISSIM models shall be developed utilizing the existing traffic count data and geometry information from the field review. i. US 54: EXISTING TRAFFIC AND EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION 1. US 54: 2 to 5-lane section from ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Bridge to Bea Street 2. US 54: 5 to 4-lane section from Bea Street to Denver Avenue (Including Denrock Avenue signalized intersection)
View Source
Traffic Operational Analysis. The Engineer shall perform operational analysis for the existing conditions as well as proposed condition for the segment of IH 40 from West of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Street to West of Eastern Street the Engineer shall perform operational analysis for the existing conditions as well as up to three (3) total geometric alternatives for the ultimate configuration of the project corridor. The following tasks shall be completed for the operational analysis:
View Source
Traffic Operational Analysis. The study area is defined as the intersections and roadway links where data was collected (two intersections), KH will conduct the analysis for the weekday AM and PM peak hour time periods. KH will perform the following tasks: ⚫ Evaluate the existing (2022) intersection operational conditions at each existing study intersection; ⚫ Calculate the site buildout year each study intersection by inspection of growth rates and addition of traffic from other committed developments in the vicinity; ⚫ Evaluate the intersection operational conditions for each background traffic scenario; ⚫ Calculate new site-generated traffic based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, latest edition, including reductions for internal capture and transit adjacency; ⚫ Create distribution of site-generated traffic in the major directions; ⚫ Assign site-generated traffic onto site driveways and adjacent roadways; ⚫ Evaluate intersection traffic operations for the buildout scenarios using background and site- generated traffic at the study intersections; ⚫ Perform a link capacity analysis for the roadway adjacent to the site for the existing and future year scenarios; ⚫ Identify intersection and thoroughfare deficiencies based on background and site-related traffic; ⚫ Recommend site access and transportation improvements needed to maintain traffic flow in the study area, and identify the site’s pro-rata share of the costs, if any, and ⚫ Recommend intersection geometry and type of traffic control at project driveways. ⚫ No traffic signal warrant analysis is included as part of this scope of services
View Source
Traffic Operational Analysis. The Engineer shall perform operational analysis for the existing conditions as well as proposed condition for the segment of US 54 from the vicinity of the BNSF railroad crossing to the FM 2677 intersection. The Engineer shall develop VISSIM traffic models for the existing conditions as well as up to five (5) total geometric alternatives for the ultimate configuration. The following tasks shall be completed for the operational analysis: a. Existing Conditions Analysis. Existing condition intersections models (up to 4 intersections identified in the turning movement count list) shall be developed using Synchro® software for US 54 for both AM and PM peak hour. The existing traffic count data (and geometry information from the field review shall be used for developing the VISSIM model. The following existing VISSIM models shall be developed utilizing the existing traffic count data and geometry information from the field review.
View Source
Traffic Operational Analysis. Roadway Design
View Source
Traffic Operational Analysis. The Engineer shall perform operational analysis for the existing conditions as well as proposed controlled access facility for segment C-1, C-2, D, and A-3. The Engineer shall perform operational analysis for the existing conditions as well as up to two (2) total geometric alternatives for the ultimate configuration of the SL 335 and US 87 interchange. The following tasks shall be completed for the operational analysis: 4.7.3.1 Existing Conditions Analysis Existing condition intersections models (up to 67 intersections identified in the table below) shall be developed using Synchro software for SL 335 for both AM and PM peak hour. The existing traffic count data and geometry information from the field review shall be used for developing the model. The existing conditions model shall be verified to queuing information obtained from the field review. Segment C-  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) Westbound and FM 1 1719 (Western St)  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) Eastbound and FM 1719 (Western St)  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Dr Loop Connector  SL 335 (St ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Ave) and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Dr (North Intersection)  SL 335 (St ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Ave) and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Dr (South Intersection)  SL 335 (St ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Ave) and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ St  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) Westbound and RM 1061 (Tascosa Rd)  SL 335 (St ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Ave) Eastbound and RM 1061 (Tascosa Rd)  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) and SW 9th Ave  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) and Soncy Rd Segment C-  SL 335 (St ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Ave) and Echo ▇▇ ▇  ▇▇ ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) and Morning Dr  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) and Slope Dr  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) and Mountain Dr  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) and Quincy Dr  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) and Pavillard Dr  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Dr  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) and River Rd  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) and US87 (▇▇▇▇▇ Dr) Northbound  SL 335 (St ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Ave) and US87 (▇▇▇▇▇ Dr) Southbound  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) Westbound and FM 2176 (Broadway Dr)  SL ▇▇▇ (▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇) Eastbound and FM 2176 (Broadway Dr)  ▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇  ▇▇ 87 SBFR and E. Central Ave  ▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇  ▇▇ 87 SBFR and E. Willow Creek Dr Segment D  SL 335 (Lakeside Dr) Southbound and SE 3rd Ave  SL 335 (Lakeside Dr) Northbound and ▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇  ▇▇ ▇▇▇ (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇) and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ DocuSign Envelope ID: 67397975-F81B-4755-90E3-12120FAB096F  SL 335 (Lakeside Dr) Northbound and Route 66 (Business 40)  SL 335 (Lakeside...
View Source
Traffic Operational Analysis. The existing year, opening year, and design year will be established.
View Source

Related to Traffic Operational Analysis

  • Risk Analysis The Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to Securities Depositories operating in the countries listed in Appendix B. If the Custodian is unable to provide a Risk Analysis with respect to a particular Securities Depository, it will notify the Fund. If a new Securities Depository commences operation in one of the Appendix B countries, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis in a reasonably practicable time after such Securities Depository becomes operational. If a new country is added to Appendix B, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to each Securities Depository in that country within a reasonably practicable time after the addition of the country to Appendix B.

  • Research Analyst Independence The Company acknowledges that the Underwriters’ research analysts and research departments are required to be independent from their respective investment banking divisions and are subject to certain regulations and internal policies, and that such Underwriters’ research analysts may hold views and make statements or investment recommendations and/or publish research reports with respect to the Company and/or the offering that differ from the views of their respective investment banking divisions. The Company hereby waives and releases, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any claims that the Company may have against the Underwriters with respect to any conflict of interest that may arise from the fact that the views expressed by their independent research analysts and research departments may be different from or inconsistent with the views or advice communicated to the Company by such Underwriters’ investment banking divisions. The Company acknowledges that each of the Underwriters is a full service securities firm and as such from time to time, subject to applicable securities laws, may effect transactions for its own account or the account of its customers and hold long or short positions in debt or equity securities of the companies that may be the subject of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

  • Investment Analysis and Implementation In carrying out its obligations under Section 1 hereof, the Advisor shall: (a) supervise all aspects of the operations of the Funds; (b) obtain and evaluate pertinent information about significant developments and economic, statistical and financial data, domestic, foreign or otherwise, whether affecting the economy generally or the Funds, and whether concerning the individual issuers whose securities are included in the assets of the Funds or the activities in which such issuers engage, or with respect to securities which the Advisor considers desirable for inclusion in the Funds' assets; (c) determine which issuers and securities shall be represented in the Funds' investment portfolios and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; (d) formulate and implement continuing programs for the purchases and sales of the securities of such issuers and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; and (e) take, on behalf of the Trust and the Funds, all actions which appear to the Trust and the Funds necessary to carry into effect such purchase and sale programs and supervisory functions as aforesaid, including but not limited to the placing of orders for the purchase and sale of securities for the Funds.