Traffic Projections Clause Samples

The Traffic Projections clause defines the expected volume or flow of data, goods, or users over a specified period within the context of the agreement. Typically, it outlines estimated numbers or ranges, which may be used for planning capacity, setting performance benchmarks, or determining pricing structures. By establishing clear expectations regarding anticipated traffic, this clause helps both parties align resources and manage risk related to over- or under-utilization.
Traffic Projections. Coordinate with others (Segment C Engineer is preparing traffic projections of Segments B-4 and C) as they prepare traffic projections for the opening-year, design-year (opening year +20) and pavement design year (opening year + 30) for the mainlanes, ramps, cross streets, interchanges, intersections, and frontage roads. Utilize the traffic data to prepare the geometric schematic design.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Traffic Projections. Future traffic conditions for the opening year will be developed based on past traffic data. Other planned developments will be included as appropriate, as mutually agreed upon with the City of ▇▇▇ Arbor. The City will be asked to comment on the methodology for the opening year (2015) traffic projections. The number of buses (including UMHS shuttles and line buses) that may use the Intermodal Station will be estimated based on input from AATA and UM Parking & Transportation Services staff. Future trip generation and trip distribution for the parking deck will be based on the traffic characteristics determined from the existing parking lot (M71) and the traffic counts performed at the intersections within the study area. The amount of pick-up and drop-off vehicle activity will be estimated based on previous pick-up and drop-off data collected near the area and the estimated ridership of the rail passenger facility. The pick-up and drop-off activity may be represented by private automobiles and/or taxis. The study area for the traffic analysis will include the intersections listed in the Traffic Data section, including the following roadway segments: ▇▇. ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ City of ▇▇▇ Arbor ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road Station PSA Amendment No. 2 SmithGroupJJR No. 50156.001 May 31, 2012 Page 5 • ▇▇▇▇ Avenue between Huron Street and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Street • ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road between ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Street and Bonisteel Boulevard • ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Street/Depot Street between ▇▇▇▇ Avenue/▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road and Main Street • Maiden Lane between ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road and Broadway Street/Plymouth Road • Broadway Street between Summit Street and Maiden Lane The intersection capacity analysis will be conducted for five scenarios: • Existing (2012) • No-build opening year (2015) • Opening year with facility (2015) – ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road Station site • Opening year with facility (2015) – Amtrak Station site A horizon year analysis is not included as part of this scope of work. The morning and afternoon peak-hour level of service (LOS), vehicle delay, and vehicle queue results will be provided for the intersections listed in the Traffic Data section and presented in tables that compare the scenarios. The methodology of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) will be used for the analysis of the signalized and un-signalized intersections, and the traffic signal network will be modeled using Synchro and SimTraffic software. In urbanized areas, LOS D is generally considered acceptable for peak-hour conditions. The intersections that do not meet LOS D will be e...
View Source
Traffic Projections. 4.1. Develop background turning movement traffic projections at the study intersections for the following peak hours: a. Weekday AM peak hour b. Weekday PM peak hour c. Weekend peak hour 4.2. Calculate the number of estimated trips destined to/from the event each day, including passenger vehicle trips to/from parking location and shuttle trips to/from the event space. 4.3. Assign event trips to a transportation mode. Determine the distribution percentages of event vehicular traffic to each project intersection.
View Source
Traffic Projections. The WSB team will complete traffic projections for year of opening, 10 years out and 20 years out for each of the intersections to be counted. Draft projections will be provided for review and comment. Future volumes will be based on planned development and historic growth rates. The regional model will not be used.
View Source
Traffic Projections. The CONSULTANT, in accordance with Procedure 525-030- 120, “Design Traffic Procedure”, may be required to estimate future design hour and design peak hour traffic volumes using travel demand models (FSUTMS), historical traffic growth, land use data or other appropriate traffic forecasting methodologies defined by the DEPARTMENT.
View Source
Traffic Projections. The Engineer shall utilize the traffic volume data collected in Task
View Source
Traffic Projections. (a) The Licensee shall submit annual cargo-wise traffic projections to the Licensor. (b) The Licensee shall submit monthly reports on actual cargo-wise traffic and annual variance of actual traffic against annual projections and estimates envisaged in the Approved DPRs.
View Source
Traffic Projections. The determination of future traffic has been accomplished using the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure and the Northeast Regional Planning Model (NERPM) Version 4.2 network and socio-economic data. The model base year is 2005 and the design year is 2035. Model network has also been developed for interim years 2015 and 2025. Socio-economic data has also been developed for each year from 2010 to 2035. The basis of the transportation network data was the 2015 model for the Phase IV analysis. The First Coast TPO master project list was reviewed to ensure only the network that is projected to be in place in 2020 is used. For Phase IV, the 2015 network was used with the following specific modifications discussed at the methodology meeting and follow-up correspondence:
View Source
Traffic Projections. Existing and projected traffic volumes for the project corridor(s) are required for the short-, mid-, and long-term designs. The ENGINEER shall provide the following:  Meetings/Teleconferences - The ENGINEER shall participate in working meetings or teleconferences with the STATE, the Transportation Planning and Programming Division of TxDOT (TPP), and other pertinent agencies. The first meeting shall be the kickoff meeting to verify the project schedule, points of contact, study methodology including definition of required analysis scenarios and necessary analysis to be conducted, data sources, traffic factors, DocuSign Envelope ID: 9E4E3B84-8519-409C-AEF8-0383FB0D2E89 development of design traffic volumes, and documentation required to address project specific criteria required by the STATE; (up to 5 meetings)  The ENGINEER shall prepare meeting notes and the decisions regarding the study design process and proposed methodology shall be documented in a preliminary meeting memorandum and submitted for review and approval by the STATE;  Methodology Development - The ENGINEER shall develop a proposed methodology for estimating traffic projections for each component of the project corridor; (Submit paperwork request for TPP (2124 Form and maps, etc.)  The ENGINEER shall review the methodology with the STATE. Based on these discussions, the ENGINEER shall address comments and incorporate revisions, as necessary, to the methodology;  The ENGINEER shall submit a memorandum outlining the final methodology for estimating traffic projections for the State’s review and approval;  Existing Traffic Counts and Data Review - The ENGINEER shall review necessary project related traffic data provided by the STATE. This data shall consist of traffic volume counts, corridor or study area historical count year data from permanent count stations, vehicle classification data and historical truck data;  The ENGINEER shall submit an Existing Traffic Report detailing the findings. In addition the ENGINEER shall provide the existing traffic numbers on the stick diagram. The report and stick diagrams shall be submitted to the STATE for review and approval;
View Source

Related to Traffic Projections

  • Annual Projections As soon as practicable and in any event prior to the beginning of each Fiscal Year, Borrowers shall deliver to Lender projected balance sheets, statements of income and cash flow for Borrowers on a consolidated and consolidating basis, for each of the twelve (12) months during such Fiscal Year, which shall include the assumptions used therein, together with appropriate supporting details as reasonably requested by Lender.

  • Annual Operating Budget and Financial Projections Within sixty (60) days after the end of each fiscal year of Borrower Representative (and promptly and within five (5) days of any material modification thereto), an annual operating budgets, on a consolidating basis (including income statements, balance sheets and cash flow statements, by month) for the upcoming fiscal year of Borrower Representative, as approved by Borrower Representative’s Board, together with any related business forecasts used in the preparation of such annual financial projections.

  • Financial Projections Borrower shall have delivered to Lender Borrower’s business plan and/or financial projections or forecasts as most recently approved by Borrower’s Board of Directors.

  • Projections As of the Closing Date, to the best knowledge of Borrower, the assumptions set forth in the Projections are reasonable and consistent with each other and with all facts known to Borrower, and the Projections are reasonably based on such assumptions. Nothing in this Section 4.17 shall be construed as a representation or covenant that the Projections in fact will be achieved.

  • FALSE STATEMENTS CONCERNING HIGHWAY PROJECTS T h i s p r o v i s i o n i s applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related subcontracts. In order to assure high quality and durable construction in conformity with approved plans and specifications and a high degree of reliability on statements and representations made by engineers, contractors, suppliers, and workers on Federal- aid highway projects, it is essential that all persons concerned with the project perform their functions as carefully, thoroughly, and honestly as possible. Willful falsification, distortion, or misrepresentation with respect to any facts related to the project is a violation of Federal law. To prevent any misunderstanding regarding the seriousness of these and similar acts, Form FHWA-1022 shall be posted on each Federal-aid highway project (23 CFR 635) in one or more places where it is readily available to all persons concerned with the project: 18 U.S.C. 1020 reads as follows: "Whoever, being an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, or of any State or Territory, or whoever, whether a person, association, firm, or corporation, knowingly makes any false statement, false representation, or false report as to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of the material used or to be used, or the quantity or quality of the work performed or to be performed, or the cost thereof in connection with the submission of plans, maps, specifications, contracts, or costs of construction on any highway or related project submitted for approval to the Secretary of Transportation; or Whoever knowingly makes any false statement, false representation, false report or false claim with respect to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of any work performed or to be performed, or materials furnished or to be furnished, in connection with the construction of any highway or related project approved by the Secretary of Transportation; or Whoever knowingly makes any false statement or false representation as to material fact in any statement, certificate, or report submitted pursuant to provisions of the Federal-aid Roads Act approved July 1, 1916, (39 Stat. 355), as amended and supplemented; Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both."