Traffic Analysis Sample Clauses

Traffic Analysis. The [ ] shall require a developer to submit a Traffic Impact Analysis Checklist (Exhibit B, attached) and a Channelization Plan Checklist (Exhibit D, attached) as part of the developer’s development application. See Section 5.1. At a minimum, the traffic analysis shall consist of Section 1 of the checklist, fully completed and signed by the developer. The STATE may only require a traffic study consistent with Section 2 of the checklist if one of the following two conditions is met: (1) the development generates more than [NEGOTIABLE: e.g., 50 PM] peak-hour trips; or, (2) the development will add [NEGOTIABLE: e.g., ten (10)] or more PM peak-hour trips to an LOS "F" intersection or HAL location. Only the STATE may waive the requirement for traffic analysis studies. a. STATE will use [ ] approved trip reduction credits for TDM measures in determining traffic impacts on State transportation facilities. b. STATE may request supplemental information and analysis as necessary to determine development impacts, if any, on State transportation facilities. Supplemental information may include explanatory information, detailed documentation or further analysis to clarify or expand on data provided in the traffic analysis.

Traffic Analysis. Conduct traffic analysis and studies as requested. Assess existing and proposed facilities to demonstrate their impacts on traffic operations. Tasks provided can encompass a varying scale of studies from qualitative justifications to full detailed reporting and modeling depending on the City’s needs.

Traffic Analysis. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ will use the published existing ADT from available County maps. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ will coordinate with CMAP to obtain 2030 traffic projections.

Traffic Analysis. The ENGINEER shall perform work for the Mobility Authority to analyze up to three scenarios using the year 2040 T&R forecasts developed by the T&R consultant. This task will generally include volume development for the AM and PM peak hours, developing corridor models, and compiling and comparing the results. Task 1: Volume Development Utilizing area traffic counts and the 24-hour volumes from the T&R study prepared by the T&R Consultant, the ENGINEER will develop a line diagram depicting AM and PM peak hour volumes. • Line diagram depicting AM and PM peak hour volumes.

Traffic Analysis. No traffic data collection or analysis is assumed. Applicable traffic data will be provided by the City of Overland Park.

Traffic Analysis. Prepare a memorandum summarizing all the Traffic Operational Analysis along the studied corridor. In addition to reporting the study process and findings, corridor and intersection recommendations shall be documented to meet the traffic demands for future year. Provide recommendations and schematic exhibits of recommended improvements in signed sealed report. EOR shall coordinate with the traffic provider for the completion of the traffic tasks, which shall be included in the Study Phase Report or Design Plans. A. Traffic Study and Coordination o Submit a memo outlining the sources for traffic count data and methodology used to estimate the traffic volumes before proceeding to the analysis phase. o Conduct turning movement counts at the following intersections for 13 hours each to conduct Signal Warrant Analysis. o Intersections: • Fairmont Pkwy & Genoa Red Bluff Rd/Canada • Fairmont Pkwy & Pecan Crossing Ln/New West Dr • Fairmont Pkwy & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ o Additionally, a 24-hour automatic tube recorder count shall be conducted. • East of Fairmont Pkwy & Pecan Crossing Ln/New West Dr intersection o Perform field observations for observing existing traffic patterns o Perform Traffic Warrant Analysis for the three intersections listed above using TMUTCD guidelines. B. Existing Condition Analysis Provide an existing condition capacity analysis for the intersections listed above for typical weekday AM and PM peak conditions and provide outputs in the form of delays, volume to capacity (v/c) ratios, 50% and 95% queue length, and level of service (LOS). C. Traffic Projections o Based on the direction provided by the County, assume the built-out year for this project is five years past the existing year. o Develop traffic projections for the study corridor for the future built out year using a growth rate to be approved by the County and City. H-GAC’s regional travel demand model, TxDOT historic data and traffic counts from previous studies shall be used to estimate the growth rate. D. Future Conditions Analysis and Recommendations o Estimate future conditions capacity including delay, v/c ratios, traffic queues, and LOS for the study area intersections listed under Task 2 for typical weekday AM and PM peak hours. This shall be used as a base condition scenario for comparison with proposed alternative scenario. Any capacity limitations in no-build scenario shall be identified and recommendations shall be made as part of a preferred alternative. o Use Synchro software...

Traffic Analysis. With input from BCAD, an Aircraft Fleet Mix will be selected and a traffic distribution model developed. This information will be used in remaining life and pavement design computations. Traditionally, historical traffic data is utilized with a growth factor incorporated over the design life of the pavements. All inputs will be reviewed and coordinated with BCAD.

Traffic Analysis. Field Work • Existing Condition including railway Ave and 23rd Avenue access needs • Operations During Construction • Future with Bridge Open • Potential Impact w/ Reroute & Mitigation including planning level options to discourage EPIC traffic, especially freight, from using E. Grand Ave • Evaluation Matrix and Recommendations including input on need of Railway Ave

Traffic Analysis. Traffic Operations Report (TOR): The purpose of the TOR is to document existing (2016) traffic conditions as well as opening year (2020) and future year (2030) traffic conditions resulting from this specific project. The following tasks will be conducted. Only those items specifically stated in this scope of work are included. No other items are assumed or implied. Iteris staff will coordinate with the C/CAG and Caltrans to discuss the traffic study parameters and refine the scope of the traffic analyses. Such items as the number and location of study intersections, opening and future year, and other methodological assumptions will be discussed, agreed upon and finalized. Iteris will prepare a Traffic Analysis Methodology Memorandum which will include all assumptions and list of analyses that will be performed in support of the project. The document will specify the travel demand model to be applied, the methodology to be used to forecast traffic opening and future horizon year, project study area definition, traffic data sources (existing and new) to be used for developing existing conditions, assumptions regarding percentage of traffic volume diversion, and type of analyses to be performed, as well as traffic impact criteria thresholds. A draft memorandum will be prepared and circulated for approval and a Final Technical Memorandum will be developed for final concurrence after receipt of comments on the draft. • Draft and Final Traffic Methodology Memorandum Data Collection Study Area The study area of the operational analysis is assumed to be the Airport Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard corridors in the City of South San Francisco, as shown in the following map. For this scope of services, the following intersections are assumed to be part of analysis: