Transportation Concurrency Clause Samples

Transportation Concurrency. Concurrency certificate for traffic was issued on May 17 , 2016 .

Transportation Concurrency. A traffic analysis has been submitted to the City that demonstrates that concurrency for the Project will be met. Any future concurrency analysis shall consider only new trips generated by the Project (trips in addition to those generated by the previous use on the site). Concurrency for the Project may be reserved upon the non-refundable payment of 25% of the applicable City impact fees by the Developer which payment shall be calculated to include those impact fees paid by the Developer prior to the date of this PUD Agreement. These fees shall be nonrefundable, but shall be credited against total impact fees due for the Project. The vesting of capacity will run with the vesting of the project, and cannot be transferred to another project.

Transportation Concurrency. Based on the Traffic Study (as amended) attached here to as Exhibit 4, traffic concurrency is met for the proposed Project. Traffic concurrency is vested through the Site Plan approval process as outlined in the City’s LDC. Due to the extent of detail provided in the Conceptual Master Plan and related traffic studies, traffic concurrency is vested for one (1) year until the Site Plan is reviewed and approved, at which time traffic concurrency will be vested in accordance with the City’s LDC.

Transportation Concurrency. 8.1. As stated in Section 11.2 of the Master Transportation Financing Agreement, Appendix J to the IHDA, all “applicable County, City and State level of service standards and concurrency requirements” were satisfied by the original developers’ compliance with this Master Transportation Financing Agreement. 8.1.1. The Project satisfies concurrency because the transportation analysis submitted in support of the SEPA checklist demonstrates that fewer PM Peak hour trips will be generated by the Project than by the original mix of uses to which Owner is vested by means of its plat application. 8.1.2. The three hundred twenty-five thousand (325,000) square feet of Owner’s Additional Commercial/Retail Development also satisfy concurrency because section 5.2 of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Amendment states that currency for this additional development is satisfied so long as the PM Peak Hour trips remain at or below 6,816 trips, and the transportation analysis demonstrates that the PM Peak Hour trips for the Project will be fewer than the 1,661 trips allocated to the Property as the Owner’s share of these 6,816 trips.

Transportation Concurrency. OLD KINGS’ grant of the New Right of Way set forth herein to the CITY, in addition to the payment of the special assessments to be paid in accordance with the Special Assessment District Ordinance and the construction of Phase I of the Old Kings Road improvement project, will result in each Adjacent Tract (including the Wal-Mart Tract) being deemed to have satisfied traffic concurrency for development of a floor area ratio not exceeding 0.20; provided further, however, that the owner of the Adjacent Tract shall pay all applicable impact fees.

Transportation Concurrency. The City’s transportation concurrency ordinance was 384 adopted in accordance with a requirement of the Growth Management Act (“GMA”) (RCW 385 36.70A.060(6)(b)). The GMA requires the City to determine that transportation facility 386 improvements or strategies will be in place concurrently with land development. “Concurrent with 387 the development” is defined by the GMA to mean that any necessary “improvements or strategies 388 are in place at the time of development or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the 389 improvements or strategies within six years.” Pursuant to LMC Ch. 12.22, the City has determined 390 that the Allowable Development Capacity meets the City’s standards for transportation 391 concurrency and mitigates any significant adverse impacts to the City’s transportation system as 392 provided in Table 1 (“Phased Concurrency Capacity Allocation Schedule”) that establishes 393 concurrency for the Project over three phases (“Concurrency Phases”); provided that the Project 394 is developed in compliance with the terms of this Agreement, including any requirement that 395 Owner pay transportation impact fees as required. The City agrees that no further concurrency 396 review and/or mitigation of transportation impacts are required for the Concurrency Phases.

Transportation Concurrency. Concurrency certificates for traffic were issued on November 4th, 2015.

Transportation Concurrency. Pursuant to review of the traffic analysis for the Project (Exhibit “3”), it appears that roadway capacity exists to support the proposed increase in development density. A traffic study showing the correct number of units shall be submitted at the time of Site Plan application. Reservation of traffic concurrency shall be made only upon issuance of a Development Order (DO) for the Site Plan.

Transportation Concurrency. The Developer shall prepare a traffic study based on the criteria located in Section 4 of the City of Palm Coast Technical Manual. The new square footage will be added to the current square footage and the site will be analyzed as a whole. Concurrency will be based off of the new square footage and compared to current traffic and vested trips to determine whether there is enough capacity to vest the additional trips.