University of Arizona Sample Clauses

University of Arizona. RESEARCH AND OPTION AGREEMENT
View SourceView Similar (2)
University of Arizona. Camp Programs must obtain written permission from a parent/guardian regarding use and application of sunscreen (see form below)
View Source
University of Arizona. ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Director, School of Natural Resources University of Arizona ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Phone: (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Fax: (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇
View Source
University of Arizona. Arkansas University of Arkansas Colorado
View Source
University of Arizona. In 2015, the University of Arizona conducted an RFP to assess current proctoring partners. During the RFP process, Examity unseated competitors ProctorU and Software Secure (now PSI) to win the contract. In 2018, at the expiration of the contract, another RFP was issued and awarded again to Examity. Examity currently works with 14 out of the University of Arizona’s 19 colleges, proctoring more than 500 courses led by over 250 instructors, and supporting 20,000+ students a year. During our first full year with the university we proctored over 40,000 tests. In 2019, that number swelled to more than 80,000 with an average wait-time of 28 seconds for all live proctored exams. This is a true testament to our ability to scale. The University of Arizona uses Examity for both residential and online programs and takes advantage of all proctoring modalities. Examity encourages all of our new and current clients to follow the online proctoring best practices below: • Incorporate Examity into your course syllabus • Direct students to available guides, videos, and support for assistance • Register and schedule exams as early as possible • 24-hour exam windows • Ensure device readiness via the systems check • Avoid large simultaneous testing groups • Make automated practice tests available to students Examity believes a big part of why we have been able to maintain successful partnerships with West ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Millersville, and Shippensburg over the years has been because they have adhered and promoted these at their institutions.
View Source
University of Arizona. The first year of the three-year plan includes one project totaling $30 million. The FY 2010 building renewal formula calculation equates to $49.3 million for academic and support facilities. ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ highlighted the first year project of the $30M parking structure which will provide approximately 1000-1500 spaces and will have some retail on the ground floor. As plans for this project progress the university will be looking at the possibility of third party financing and privatized development. Regent ▇▇▇▇▇ asked about the parking structures. Regent ▇▇▇▇▇ asked if he was correct that the NAU parking structures were being privately developed, but NAU was financing and would own the structures. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ stated that NAU is trying to find a partner for the larger parking structure. The smaller parking structure will be financed by the university. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ stated that the south campus dorm would be privately funded and off the NAU books. Upon motion by Regent ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, seconded by Regent ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, the Board unanimously approved the FY 2010-2012 Capital Improvement Plans as submitted in the executive summary. Regent ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ stated that in addition to the benefits the SPEED initiative would provide to the university building system, the intent was also to provide a stimulus to the state's economy. He made clear the Board's support for stimulating the economy through the participation of local firms in capital projects, the hiring of Arizona labor and the purchasing of materials in this state, but also acknowledge the limitations on what can be required. He suggested the Board make a resolution stating that the Board will continue its efforts to stimulate the local economy through the development and maintenance of critical university capital infrastructure, to the extent allowable law. The other Board members agreed. Upon motion by Regent ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, seconded by Regent ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, the Board unanimously resolved to require the contractors on capital projects have a veteran's hiring preference, and to continue its efforts to stimulate the local Arizona economy through the development and maintenance of critical university capital infrastructure, to the extent allowable by law. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ joined the meeting for this presentation. Regent ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ stated that Arizona State University was requesting combined Project Implementation Approval and Project Approval for SPEED Deferred Maintenance and Building Renewal Bundle Phase 1a projects totaling...
View Source

Related to University of Arizona

  • University Any notice may be served upon the University by delivering it, in writing, to the University at the address set forth on the last page of this Agreement, by depositing it in a United States Postal Service deposit box with the postage fully prepaid and with the notice addressed to the University at the aforementioned address, or by sending a facsimile of it to the University facsimile number set forth on the last page of this Agreement.

  • Community Outreach Please describe all community outreach efforts undertaken since the last report.

  • MIDDLE SCHOOLS 1. Where there are no negotiated provisions concerning the implementation or operation of a middle school program, this article shall govern the implementation or operation of a middle school program in a school district. 2. Should the employer seek to establish a middle school program in one or more schools in a district, the employer and the local shall meet, no later than ten (10) working days from a decision of the employer to implement a middle school program, in order to negotiate any alternate or additional provisions to the Collective Agreement which are necessary to accommodate the intended middle school program. 3. In the absence of any other agreement with respect to the instructional day and preparation time, the provisions of the Collective Agreement with regard to secondary schools shall apply to middle schools. 4. If the employer and the local are unable to agree on what, if any, alternate or additional provisions of the collective agreement are necessary to accommodate the intended middle school program(s), either party may refer the matter(s) in dispute to expedited arbitration for final and binding resolution pursuant to Article D.5.5 below. a. The jurisdiction of the arbitrator shall be limited to the determination of alternate or additional provisions necessary to accommodate the intended middle school program(s). b. In the event the arbitration is not concluded prior to the implementation of the middle school program, the arbitrator will have remedial authority to make appropriate retroactive modifications and adjustments to the agreement. c. The arbitration shall convene within thirty (30) working days of referral to arbitration in accordance with the following: i. Within ten (10) working days of the matter being referred to arbitration, the parties shall identify all issues in dispute; ii. Within a further five (5) working days, there shall be a complete disclosure of particulars and documents; iii. Within a further five (5) working days, the parties shall exchange initial written submissions; iv. The hearing shall commence within a further ten (10) working days; and v. The arbitrator shall render a final and binding decision within fifteen (15) working days of the arbitration concluding. 6. Where a middle school program has been established on or prior to ratification of the 2006-2011 Provincial Collective Agreement, the existing provisions shall be retained unless the parties mutually agree that they should be amended.

  • PROFESSORS AND TEACHERS A professor or teacher who makes a temporary visit to a Contracting State for a period not exceeding two years for the purpose of teaching or conducting research at a university, college, school or other educational institution, and who is, or immediately before such visit was, a resident of the other Contracting State shall be exempt from tax in the first-mentioned Contracting State in respect of remuneration for such teaching or research.

  • Research Primary Investigator as part of a multi-site study (25 points) • Co-Investigator as part of a multi-site study (20 points) • Primary Investigator of a facility/unit based research study (15 points) • Co-Investigator of a facility/unit based research study (10 points) • Develops a unit specific research proposal (5 points) • Conducts a literature review as part of a research study (5 points)