Workshop Presentations Clause Samples

The Workshop Presentations clause outlines the requirements and expectations for delivering presentations during a workshop. It typically specifies who is responsible for presenting, the topics to be covered, and any necessary materials or formats to be used. This clause ensures that all parties are clear on their roles and the content to be delivered, promoting effective communication and organization during the workshop.
Workshop Presentations. Employees will receive additional pay for reasonable preparation time and for presentation of workshops in their areas of expertise at the rate paid to Studio Technicians for “original technical instruction”.
View SourceView Similar (10)
Workshop Presentations. If a staff member makes a presentation as part of the Professional Development Program, a fee of $50.00 per hour is to be paid for each hour of preparation time equal to each hour of presentation time. If multiple presenters are needed, the fee will be divided. Subsequent presentations of the same workshop, by the same presenter, will be compensated at a rate of 1 hour ($50.00 per hour) of preparation time for every 2 hours of presentation time.”
View SourceView Similar (2)
Workshop Presentations. The workshop lasted two days, the first being dedicated to lectures and discussions and the second to visits in the countryside of the Banat region. The first day included a morning session during which main institutions acting in the heritage domain in the Banat region presented their current activities and shared visions for the future regarding creative industries and the heritage domain: the University of the West, Timisoara and its research / academic program, the inter-cultural institute, operating under the European Commission and implementing its policies and the association Timisoara European Capital of Culture. Particular aspects that were highlighted were the inter-departmental academic and research activities aimed at preparing students for the challenges of the modern society of tomorrow, related to how to invest, develop and sustain the rich, multi-ethnical heritage of the region, the policies, programs and initiatives of the European Commission regarding heritage and the deep impact a European capital of culture may have on the citizen inhabiting it. The second part of the morning introduced the audience to the Creative CH project and the Banat showcase, their scopes, activities and achievements so far. Particular topics addressed in depth were - the role academic institutions may and should have in developing relationships between the various sectors active in the creative industries for the cultural heritage domain, - the richness of the regional heritage and archaeology and societal valuable research in this field,
View Source
Workshop Presentations. The workshop focused on the opportunities and challenges in the revitalization and communication of industrial heritage sites. Revitalization of such sites typically requires realizing new forms of usage such as facilities for cultural organizations (museums, galleries, etc.) and workspaces for creative industry businesses. After the opening address of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (University of Coimbra), in the first section of the workshop three presentations were given: • Public authorities supporting civil society groups to carry out conservation and regeneration work on their urban heritage sites (Amsterdam, Newcastle); • Public authorities being flexible concerning adapted re-use of historic buildings (Westergasfabriek Amsterdam, Stadtforum Leipzig HausHalten); • Visionary developers and municipalities upgrading historic settings with contemporary architecture (MAS Antwerp, Oliaros in KM Athens); • Giving back to society through creative funding mechanisms (Dutch BankGiro Lottery grants, Greek Piraeus Bank Group Cultural Foundation museums). Among the various models particularly novel funding mechanisms such as the Dutch BankGiro Lottery grants or “crowd sourcing” of financial contributions caught the attention of the workshop participants. According to ▇▇▇▇▇, revitalized industrial heritage complexes can contribute to the regeneration of their surrounding neighborhoods and to the prosperity of cities as a whole. Therefore heritage regeneration projects need to be financed and carried out considering the effects on the larger city landscape. • heritage sites citizens feel a strong attachment to, • new locations for culture and creative industries, and • development motors with positive effects on the urban landscape. Drawing on the results of a research project funded by the German Research Foundation, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ addressed positive aspects of the revitalization of industrial sites, but also conflicts among the various stakeholders who have different values and goals. Therefore she highlighted “bridging values” that provide a basis for collaboration. Such values are accessibility, specificity and historical character. Such values of industrial heritage buildings appeal to all stakeholders, developers, conservators and users alike. Based on the experiences and recent projects of the Institut für Neue Industriekultur (INIK), ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ explained re-use opportunities and challenges of former industrial sites located in German-Polish border areas. He pointed out ...
View Source

Related to Workshop Presentations

  • Publications and Presentations (a) Corvus may publish or present the final results of the Study (in accordance with this Section 8.2); provided that Corvus gives Genentech an opportunity to review and provide comments in accordance with subsection (b). (b) In the event that either Party (for purposes of this Section, the “Publishing Party”) wishes to publish or present any Study Data or Sample Data, the Publishing Party shall submit to the other Party (for purposes of this Section, the “Reviewing Party”) all materials related to the proposed publication or presentation (including posters, abstracts, manuscripts and written descriptions of oral presentations) at least [***] days (or [***], in the case of abstracts) prior to the date of submission for publication or the date of presentation, whichever is earlier, of any of such submitted materials. The Reviewing Party shall review such submitted materials and respond to the Publishing Party as soon as reasonably possible, but in any case within [***] (or [***], in the case of abstracts) of receipt thereof. The Publishing Party will be permitted to publish or present such Study Data or Sample Data, but shall give reasonable consideration to any request by the Reviewing Party; provided, however, at the request of the Reviewing Party, the Publishing Party shall (i) delete from such proposed publication or presentation Confidential Information of the Reviewing Party (including Sample Data), provided that the Publishing Party shall have no obligation to delete any Study Data; and/or (ii) if such proposed publication or presentation contains patentable subject matter owned solely or jointly by the Reviewing Party, delay such proposed publication or presentation, for [***], to permit the Reviewing Party to prepare and file a patent application. The Publishing Party shall comply with all applicable requirements regarding disclosure of industry support (financial or otherwise) in connection with any publications and presentations. For clarity, the provisions of this Section 8.2 only apply to publications or presentations of Study Data or Sample Data and do not apply to any other publications or presentations by a Party, including with respect to results from such Party’s development activities outside of the Study. (c) Authorship of publications or presentations of final results of the Study and/or any Study Data or Sample Data shall be determined in accordance with appropriate scientific and academic standards and customs.

  • Presentations In the event the Prime is afforded the opportunity to make presentations, whether orally or in writing, to potential customers concerning the Procurement, the content of such presentations may, at the Prime’s discretion, be made known to the Subcontractor, subject to any prohibitions or restrictions that may be imposed by the Government upon such disclosure. The Subcontractor agrees to support such presentations, as may be requested by the Prime, to the extent such presentations relate to the Subcontractor’s area of work as defined in Exhibit A.

  • SUPPLIER PUBLICATIONS Any marketing materials in relation to this Framework Agreement that that Supplier produces must comply in all respects with the Branding Guidance. The Supplier will periodically update and revise such marketing materials.

  • Publications Neither Party shall publicly present or publish results of studies carried out under this Agreement (each such presentation or publication a “Publication”) without the opportunity for prior review by the other Party, except to the extent otherwise required by Applicable Law, in which case Section 12.3 shall apply with respect to disclosures required by the SEC and/or for regulatory filings. The submitting Party shall provide the other Party the opportunity to review any proposed Publication at least thirty (30) days prior to the earlier of its presentation or intended submission for publication. The submitting Party agrees, upon request by the other Party, not to submit or present any Publication until the other Party has had thirty (30) days to comment on any material in such Publication. The submitting Party shall consider the comments of the other Party in good faith, but will retain the sole authority to submit the manuscript for Publication; provided that the submitting Party agrees to delay such Publication as necessary to enable the Parties to file a Patent if such Publication might adversely affect such Patent. The submitting Party shall provide the other Party a copy of the Publication at the time of the submission or presentation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, BMS shall not have the right to publish or present Ambrx’s Confidential Information without Ambrx’s prior written consent, and Ambrx shall not have the right to publish or present BMS’ Confidential Information without BMS’ prior written consent. Each Party agrees to acknowledge the contributions of the other Party, and the employees of the other Party, in all publications as scientifically appropriate. This Section 12.4 shall not limit and shall be subject to Section 12.5. Nothing contained in this Section 12.4 shall prohibit the inclusion of information in a patent application claiming, and in furtherance of, the manufacture, use, sale or formulation of a Compound, provided that the non-filing Party is given a reasonable opportunity to review, comment upon and/or approve the information to be included prior to submission of such patent application, where and to the extent required by Article 9 hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties recognize that independent investigators have been engaged, and will be engaged in the future, to conduct Clinical Trials of Compounds and Products. The Parties recognize that such investigators operate in an academic environment and may release information regarding such studies in a manner consistent with academic standards; provided that each Party will use reasonable efforts to prevent publication prior to the filing of relevant patent applications and to ensure that no Confidential Information of either Party is disclosed.

  • Development Reports Beginning six months after Effective Date and ending on the date of first commercial sale of a Licensed Product in the United States, LICENSEE shall report to Cornell progress covering LICENSEE's (and Affiliate's and Sublicensee's) activities and efforts in the development of rights granted to LICENSEE under this Agreement for the preceding six months. The report shall include, but not be limited to, activities and efforts to develop and test all Licensed Products and obtain governmental approvals necessary for marketing the same. Such semi-annual reports shall be due within sixty days (60) of the reporting period and shall use the form as provided herein as Appendix C.