Project Cost Allocation definition
Examples of Project Cost Allocation in a sentence
If the LGIA is executed prior to the completion of the Class Year Study, the Developer must agree, in the LGIA, that in the Class Year decision process, it will accept the Project Cost Allocation and post Security for any System Upgrade Facilities that are identified and cost allocated in the Class Year Study even if such Project Cost Allocations exceed the estimates included in the LGIA and include equipment not identified in the LGIA.
The Developer executing an LGIA prior to the completion of a Class Year Study cannot participate as an Installed Capacity Supplier until after the Class Year Study is completed and (1) the project is deemed deliverable and accepts its deliverable megawatts; or (2) the Developer accepts its Project Cost Allocation and posts Security for any required System Deliverability Upgrades.
Contingent Facilities shall mean those Attachment Facilities and System Upgrade Facilities and/or System Deliverability Upgrades associated with Class Year Projects upon which the Large Facility’s Class Year Project Cost Allocations are dependent, and if delayed or not built, could impact the actual costs and timing of the Large Facility’s Project Cost Allocation for System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades.
If Berrians III, as a member of Class Year 2010, accepts its Project Cost Allocation and posts Security pursuant to the cost allocation rules contained in Attachment S to the NYISO OATT, and proceeds to negotiate a Large Generator Interconnection Agreement, the mechanism for invoicing Berrians for the cost of its interconnection, as determined by Attachment S, will be contained in the Large Generator Interconnection Agreement negotiated among the Connecting Transmission Owner, NYISO and Berrians III.
If the final Project Cost Allocation is less than the Security that Developer has provided, the Connecting Transmission Owner shall return the excess Security to the Developer.
Initial Decision Period: The 30 calendar day period within which a Developer must provide an Acceptance Notice or Non-Acceptance Notice to the ISO in response to the first Project Cost Allocation issued by the ISO to the Developer.
If SDUs are identified in the Class Year System Deliverability Study for the Class Year that commences after the completion of Class Year 2015 and Developer accepts its Project Cost Allocation and posts Security for such SDUs, the Parties shall amend this Agreement, pursuant to Articles 29.11 and 29.12, to reflect the SDUs identified in the System Deliverability Study.
The notice by which a Developer communicates to the ISO its decision not to accept a Project Cost Allocation or Revised Project Cost Allocation.
Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Contingent Facilities shall mean those Attachment Facilities and System Upgrade Facilities and/or System Deliverability Upgrades associated with Class Year Projects upon which the Large Facility’s Class Year Project Cost Allocations are dependent, and if delayed or not built, could impact the actual costs and timing of the Large Facility’s Project Cost Allocation for System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades.
Contemporaneous with the execution of this Agreement, the Developer will provide the Connecting Transmission Owner with Security to satisfy its estimated Project Cost Allocation for its share of the required System Upgrade Facilities for Class Year 2015.