Administrative Reconsideration Clause Samples
Administrative Reconsideration. If OCR determines that the proposal is non-responsible because the responder failed to make adequate good faith efforts, the responder may request administrative reconsideration. The responder will be deemed to have waived its right to request administrative reconsideration if it does not make a written request within 5 business days. The responder must make a written request for administrative reconsideration. The responder must deliver this request so that it is received by MnDOT no later than 4:30 PM on the fifth business day after the responder receives written notice of the Office of Civil Rights' determination. If the request is sent by mail, the responder should use certified mail to ensure that MnDOT received the request. The responder must submit the written request for reconsideration to the attention of: A copy of the request must be sent to: The reconsideration process is a review of only the good faith efforts made by the responder as of the submission due date. Good faith efforts made subsequent to that date will not be considered. MnDOT will provide the responder with a written decision on reconsideration, explaining the basis for the determination no later than 5 business days following the date of the meeting with Reconsideration Officials.
Administrative Reconsideration. If the Director determines that the responder failed to make adequate good faith efforts (GFE), the responder may request administrative reconsideration of that determination (49 CFR §26.53(d)).
Administrative Reconsideration. Within ten (10) days of being informed by the TJPA that it is not responsive because it has not documented sufficient good faith efforts, a bidder/proposer may request administrative reconsideration. Bidders/proposers should make this request in writing to the following reconsideration official: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇, Executive Director Transbay Joint Powers Authority ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ (415) 597-4620 The reconsideration official will not have played any role in the original determination that the bidder/proposer did not make or document sufficient good faith efforts. As part of this reconsideration, the bidder/proposer will have the opportunity to provide written documentation or argument concerning the issue of whether it met the goal or made adequate good faith efforts to do so. The bidder/proposer will also have the opportunity to meet in person with the reconsideration official to discuss the issue of whether it met the goal or made adequate good faith efforts to do so. The TJPA will send the bidder/proposer a written decision on reconsideration, explaining the basis for finding that the bidder did or did not meet the goal or make adequate good faith efforts to do so. The result of the reconsideration process is not administratively appealable to the State of California, City and County of San Francisco, or U.S. Department of Transportation.
Administrative Reconsideration. A. If the Division of Civil Rights/Affirmative Action determines that the apparent successful bidder has failed to make reasonable outreach efforts to meet the requirements of this section, the Department must, before awarding the contract, provide the bidder an opportunity for administrative reconsideration.
B. As part of this reconsideration, the bidder will have the opportunity to provide written documentation or argument concerning the issue of whether it met the goal or made adequate good faith efforts to do so. NJDOT will send the bidder a written decision on reconsideration, explaining the basis for finding that the bidder did or did not meet the SBE goal or make an adequate good faith effort to do so.
C. Within seven (7) State business days of being informed by the Division of Civil Rights/Affirmative Action that it is not a responsible bidder because it has not made or documented sufficient outreach efforts to SBEs, a bidder may make a request in writing to the Director, Division of Procurement, PO Box 605, Trenton, New Jersey, ▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇; Telephone (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇. The Director, Division of Procurement, does not participate in the initial determination of whether reasonable outreach was performed by the Contractor.
Administrative Reconsideration. If the Compliance Specialist determines that Proposer failed to submit required documentation to meet the stated outreach requirements in Section III, the Agency will permit Proposer to request HRC to reconsider this determination. In its request for reconsideration, Proposer may clarify its proposal. But Proposer may not submit or refer to new or revised documents or information. HRC will only reconsider the original proposal as clarified in the request for reconsideration. If Proposer requests HRC to reconsider the Compliance Specialist’s determination of nonresponsiveness based on insufficient demonstration of Outreach Efforts, Proposer must provide written notice to the Agency and HRC within three (3) business days of the Agency’s notice of disqualification to Proposer. The request for reconsideration should be addressed to: Human Relations Council ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Dayton, Ohio 45402 Office: (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Fax: (937) 222-458 with a copy e-mailed to the Procurement Officer and the Compliance Specialist.
Administrative Reconsideration. Within seven (7) business days of being informed by the Contract Specialist that the proposer/respondent or awardee/contractor of its nonresponsive or noncompliant status, the firm may request administrative reconsideration. Since the ACDBELO does not have any role in the determination of nonresponsive/noncompliance determination issued by Contract Specialist, the ACDBELO shall serve as the Administrative Reconsideration Officer. The appellant must make this request in writing to the following reconsideration official: ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, Director City of Phoenix Equal Opportunity Department ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Phone: (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Fax: (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ TTY: (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Email: ▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ The Administrative Reconsideration/Appeal Hearing Officer will not have played any role in the original determination. As part of this reconsideration, the appellant will have the opportunity to provide written documentation or argument concerning the issue. The appellant will have the opportunity to meet in person with the City’s Administrative Reconsideration/Appeal Hearing Officer to discuss the matter. The City will send the appellant a written decision on reconsideration, explaining the basis of the determination, which is final. The result of the reconsideration process is not subject to administrative appeal with the USDOT.
Administrative Reconsideration. 1. The Contract Compliance Administrator makes the initial determination regarding a concessionaire’s good faith efforts based upon his or her review of the documentation that the concessionaire has timely submitted in response to the City’s submittal schedule. Within five days of being informed by the City that it is not responsive because it has not documented sufficient good faith efforts, a concessionaire may request administrative reconsideration. The concessionaire should make this request in writing to the following reconsideration official: Chief Procurement Officer Department of Procurement Services City Hall Room 403 ▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Street Chicago, IL 60602 with a copy to: Deputy Procurement Officer Office of Business Development City Hall Room ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ The Chief Procurement Officer will not have played any role in the Contract Compliance Administrator’s determination that the concessionaire did not make or timely document sufficient good faith efforts.
2. As part of this reconsideration, the concessionaire will have the opportunity to provide written documentation or argument concerning the issue of whether it met the DBE Concession Goal and/or the DBE Contracting and Procurement Goal or made adequate good faith efforts to do so. The concessionaire will have the opportunity to meet in person with the Chief Procurement Officer to discuss whether it did so. The City will send the concessionaire a written decision on reconsideration, explaining the basis for finding that the concessionaire did or did not meet the DBE Concession Goal and/or the DBE Contracting and Procurement Goal or make adequate good faith efforts to do so.
Administrative Reconsideration. If the Respondent is determined to be nonresponsive, Respondent may utilize the administrative remedies in Chapter 43 of the Phoenix City Code and City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation
Administrative Reconsideration. If the Compliance Specialist determines that Respondent is nonresponsive, the City will permit Respondent to request EOD to reconsider this determination. In its request for reconsideration, Respondent may clarify its Response. But Respondent may not submit or refer to new or revised documents or information. EOD will only reconsider the original Response as clarified in the request for reconsideration. If Respondent requests EOD to reconsider the Compliance Specialist’s determination of nonresponsiveness, Respondent must provide written notice to the City and EOD within three (3) business days of the City’s notice of disqualification to Respondent. The request for reconsideration should be addressed to: City of Phoenix Equal Opportunity Department Business Relations Division-Contract Compliance Section ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ With a copy e-mailed to the Procurement Officer and the Compliance Specialist.
Administrative Reconsideration. The City of San Antonio Aviation Department has set forth in the DBE Program that within 5 working days of being informed by the City that it is not responsive because it has not documented sufficient good faith efforts, a bidder/offerer may request reconsideration. As part of this reconsideration, the bidder will have the opportunity to provide written documentation or argument concerning the issue of whether it met the goal or made adequate good faith efforts. The bidder will have the opportunity to meet in person with our reconsideration official, Aviation Director, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇., ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇, to discuss the issue of whether it met the goal or made adequate good faith efforts to do. The City will send the bidder a written decision on reconsideration, explaining the basis for finding that the bidder did or did not meet the goal or make adequate good faith efforts, The Aviation Director, who is an official who does not normally take part in the original good faith determination, will make the final decision on reconsideration. The result of the reconsideration process is not administratively appealable to the Department of Transportation.