Assumptions and Risks Sample Clauses

Assumptions and Risks. The programme assumes that the beneficiary countries will maintain their efforts to ensure a high level of nuclear safety and to implement the recommendations of the June 2001 Council Report on Nuclear Safety in the Context of Enlargement. The Peer Review Status Report, established by the Council’s Atomic Questions Group and its ad-hoc formation Working Party on Nuclear Safety on 5 June 2002, found that candidate countries are clearly committed to fulfil the recommendations set out in the Council Report, both for nuclear power plants and other types of installations. The status report also noted that all candidate countries had accepted the recommendations. This programme assumes that the beneficiary countries will continue to pay sufficient attention and devote appropriate effort to implementing the supported projects also – where and when applicable – under the EDIS in a time frame reaching beyond accession. Whilst there are no identifiable risks inherent in the tasks to be fulfilled under the various projects, an overall risk to the programme is that continued nuclear safety assistance involves the danger to create dependency on this side of the beneficiary. Special regard has to be directed towards the way in which the beneficiary organisations will sustain the results of the projects. In the cases of regulatory assistance, emphasis needs to be laid on the value of transferring know-how to the recipient and avoiding the replacement of functions in the sphere of responsibility of the beneficiary organisation through activities of the contractor.

Assumptions and Risks. Any assumption or risk external to the Program that underlies the accomplishment of the Program Objective, Project Objective and Activity outcomes and outputs.

Assumptions and Risks. The M&E Plan will also outline key assumptions and risks that underlie the program logic. However, such assumptions and risks will not excuse any Party’s performance unless otherwise expressly agreed to in writing by the other Party. The known assumptions and risks include: 1 As used in this Compact, the term “beneficiary” has the meaning described MCC’s Guidelines for Economic and Beneficiary Analysis.

Assumptions and Risks. 3.3.1 General Assumptions and Risks

Assumptions and Risks. To produce the expected results, in line with the project specific and overall objectives, the intervention rested on a number of key assumptions identified in the Description of Action. These assumptions were constantly monitored by the project management team through internal monitoring frameworks. Assumption 1 The Government of the Republic of Moldova continues to pursue its EU integration related wider reform agenda Assumption 2 The Government of the Republic of Moldova continues to facilitate access by the EU High Level Policy Advisers to the key decision-makers (Ministers, Deputy Ministers, Directors) within the line Ministries and State Agencies Assumption 3 The policy advice delivered by the EUHLPAM is reflected in the policies adopted by the Government of the Republic of Moldova; the legislation enacted by the Parliament and is promoted, implemented and enforced by the relevant State structures Assumptions are assessed as remaining valid at the report date. 1. The work of the Government and Parliament is disrupted by elections or political disputes; R 2. Lack of institutional, technical and human resource capacities and high staff turnover result in a failure to absorb the available assistance efficiently and effectively; R 3. Weaknesses in the legislative process, compounded by inadequate co-ordination between the Government and the Parliament, inhibits the timely and efficient adoption of the policy, legislative, regulatory and institutional recommendations offered by the EUHLPAM; R 4. Officials are resistant to the proposed policy, institutional and operational changes. The project adopted a balanced risk management strategy integrated into individual work plans and reports, through monitoring and early interventions, agreed with beneficiaries and undertaken at enabling levels. During the reporting period, the Government of the Republic of Moldova has changed four times. In many cases, this meant change of the management of the ministries and governmental agencies –the direct beneficiaries of the project. Nevertheless, a smooth transition to new leadership and a successful adviser-minister relationship were ensured. In the period before the Parliamentary elections of 30 November 2014, the majority of ministers have ceased their mandate. The continuity of the project’s activity throughout this period was secured through enhanced cooperation with deputy ministers, state secretaries, where available, and senior counterparts’ staff. Even the projec...

Assumptions and Risks. In this year of intervention, the agreement has some intrinsic risks because it is the beginning of the implementation, the stage of understanding and when the beneficiary population is chosen. To minimize the risks, the intervention experiences of ▇▇▇▇▇ Chocolate were taken in 1 USAID Cacao Strategy the planning, including the most recent where in conjunction with the PTP, 329 hectares were rehabilitated in Tumaco. On the other hand, there are also security risks due to the conflict situation between illegal armed groups in the Lower Cauca area. To minimize these risks the PMA experience will be taken, a program that is currently being implemented with USAID in the same area. In the AMELP there is an analysis of all the risks of the agreement, in this space only the main risks specific to this first phase are analyzed: ) 1. Check during visits to farms that there are no illicit crops and inquire about the economic activities of the family.

Assumptions and Risks. The Government of Tanzania and the International Development Partners including FAO have worked together to develop, and formulate the project starting with the expressed national need for NAFORMA information and demonstration of interest of partners to support the project. The project was designed under the assumptions that: − All Development Partners remains committed to support financially and technically to the project. − GoT remains committed to creating all the necessary conditions for the implementation of the NAFORMA project and its sustainability in the long term. In particular GoT works to: o link the project to the national policy processes (nfp, PRS, sectoral policy, etc). o build legitimacy (partners and stakeholders acceptance) for NAFORMA, through wide participation during planning and implementation of the project. o create synergies between the project and other related ongoing initiatives. o ensure NAFORMA is institutionalised and be part of the annual work and budget plan of the Government during and beyond the end of the project. o engage intersectoral policy dialogue. − Government and national stakeholders can develop a common ‘frame of reference’ to legitimise NAFORMA programme − National stakeholders are engaged in the harmonization of the forest/land use classification and forest related information framework − FBD coordinates and supervises project activities. Particularly FBD works to ensure timely inputs from all partners and stakeholders, and cost-effectiveness of the project activities. − Consensus is reached on a national list of forest and tree variables, assessment approach and methods that will help generate the needed information to all users. There are many risks that the project team should be aware of and act to minimise them. Among the major risks identified, the following are put in a matrix:

Assumptions and Risks. Assumptions Risks

Assumptions and Risks. The M&E Plan shall identify any assumptions and risks external to the Program that underlie the accomplishment of the Objectives and Outcomes; provided, however, such assumptions and risks shall not excuse performance of the Parties, unless otherwise expressly agreed to in writing by the Parties.