Continuance of Final Approval Hearing Sample Clauses
The "Continuance of Final Approval Hearing" clause allows a court or relevant authority to postpone or reschedule the final approval hearing in a legal proceeding. In practice, this means that if circumstances require more time for parties to prepare, address objections, or resolve outstanding issues, the hearing date can be moved to a later time without invalidating the process. This clause ensures flexibility in the legal timeline, helping to accommodate unforeseen delays and ensuring that all parties have adequate opportunity to participate fully before a final decision is made.
Continuance of Final Approval Hearing. The Court reserves the right to continue the date of the Final Approval Hearing without further notice to the Members of the Class, and retains jurisdiction to consider all further applications arising out of or connected with the proposed Settlement. The Court may approve the Settlement with such modifications as may be agreed to by the Parties, if appropriate, without further notice to the Class.
Continuance of Final Approval Hearing. The Court reserves the right to adjourn or continue the Final Approval Hearing and related deadlines without further written notice to the Settlement Class. If the Court alters any of those dates or times, the revised dates and times shall be posted on the Settlement Website maintained by the Settlement Administrator.
Continuance of Final Approval Hearing. The Court reserves the right to continue the Fairness Hearing without further written notice to the Class Members and the right to schedule the hearing to be done by telephone or video conference. SO ORDERED this day of , 2023. ▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. Hall United States District Judge ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EVERSOURCE ENERGY SERVICE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Case No.: 3:20-cv-00902-JCH This class action came before the Court for hearing on , 2023 to determine the fairness of the proposed Settlement presented to the Court and the subject of this Court’s Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, Preliminarily Certifying a Class for Settlement Purposes, Approving Form and Manner of Settlement Notice, and Scheduling Fairness Hearing. Due notice having been given and the Court having been fully advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: Except as otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used in this Final Approval Order and Judgment shall have the same meanings as ascribed to them in the Settlement Agreement executed by counsel on behalf of the Class Representatives, all Class Members, and Defendants, respectively.
1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Class Action and over all Parties, including all members of the Settlement Class.
2. For the sole purpose of settling and resolving the Class Action, the Court certifies the Action as a class action pursuant to Rules 23(a) and (b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Settlement Class is defined as: All participants and beneficiaries of the Plan, at any time on or after June 30, 2014 through [INSERT DATE OF ENTRY OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER] (the “Class Period”), including any beneficiary of a deceased person who was a participant in the Plan at any time during the Class Period, and any Alternate Payees, in the case of a person subject to a QDRO who was a participant in the Plan at any time during the Class Period. The Class shall exclude all Defendants and their Beneficiaries.
3. The Court finds for the sole purpose of settling and resolving the Action that:
a. as required by FED. R. CIV. P. 23(a)(1), the Settlement Class is ascertainable from records kept with respect to the Plan and from other objective criteria, and the Settlement Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable.
b. as required by FED. R. CIV. P. 23(a)(2), there are one or more questions of law and/or fact common to the Set...
Continuance of Final Approval Hearing. The Court reserves the right to continue the Fairness Hearing without further written notice to the Class Members and also may schedule the hearing to be done by telephone or video conference. SO ORDERED this day of , 2024. ▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. Baylson United States District Judge
Continuance of Final Approval Hearing. The Court reserves the right to continue the Fairness Hearing without further written notice to the Class Members and the right to schedule the hearing to be done by telephone or video conference. SO ORDERED this day of , 2022. ▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇ ▇. Kearney United States District Judge ▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Individually and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, on behalf of the UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, Plaintiffs,
Continuance of Final Approval Hearing. The Court reserves the right to adjourn or continue the approval hearing and related deadlines without further written notice to the class.
Continuance of Final Approval Hearing. The Court reserves the right to continue
Continuance of Final Approval Hearing. The Court reserves the right to continue the Fairness Hearing without further written notice to the Class Members and also may schedule the hearing to be done by telephone or video conference. SO ORDERED this day of , 2024. ▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. Garnett United States District Judge ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AEGIS MEDIA AMERICAS, INC., BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF AEGIS MEDIA AMERICAS, INC., THE BENEFITSPLUS 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN COMMITTEE, and ▇▇▇▇ DOES 1-30. Defendants. ) )
Continuance of Final Approval Hearing. The Court reserves the right to continue the Fairness Hearing without further written notice to the Class Members and also may schedule the hearing to be held by telephone or video conference. SO ORDERED this day of , 2021. ▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ United States Magistrate Judge IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CDI CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-3317-CFK This Action came before the Court for hearing on to determine the fairness of the proposed Settlement presented to the Court and the subject of this Court’s Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, Preliminarily Certifying a Class for Settlement Purposes, Approving Form and Manner of Settlement Notice, and Setting Date for a Fairness Hearing. Due notice having been given and the Court having been fully advised in the premises, Except as otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used in this Final Order and Judgment shall have the same meanings as ascribed to them in the Settlement Agreement executed by counsel on behalf of the Named Plaintiffs, all Class Members, and Defendants, respectively.
1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action and over all Settling Parties, including all members of the Settlement Class.
2. All parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).
Continuance of Final Approval Hearing. The Court reserves the right to continue the Final Approval Hearing without further written notice. SO ORDERED this day of , 2015. ▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇ ▇. Crotty United States District Judge IN RE: 2008 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ERISA LITIGATION 09-CV-01350-PAC MDL No. 2013 All Persons (excluding Defendants and their Plan beneficiaries) who were participants in or beneficiaries (including alternate payees) of the Federal National Mortgage Association Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “Plan”) at any time between April 7, 2007 and May 14, 2010 (the “Class Period”), and whose Plan accounts included investments in the ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Stock Fund at any point during the Class Period. Judge ▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) has preliminarily approved a proposed settlement (the “Settlement”) of a class action lawsuit brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The Settlement will provide for payment to eligible members of the Settlement Class who had portions of their Plan accounts invested in the Federal National Mortgage Association (“▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇”) stock fund (“▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Stock Fund”). The terms of the Settlement are summarized below. The Court has scheduled a hearing (the “Final Approval Hearing”) to consider the Plaintiffs’ motion for final approval of the settlement and Co- Lead Class Counsel’s petition for attorneys’ fees, reimbursement of litigation expenses, and for Case Contribution Awards to the two Plaintiffs. The Final Approval Hearing before U.S. District Judge ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ has been scheduled for at .m., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ United States Courthouse, Courtroom , ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇-1312, or such other courtroom as the Court may designate. Any objections to the Settlement or the petition for attorneys’ fees, reimbursement of expenses, or Case Contribution Awards to the Plaintiffs must be served in writing on Co-Lead Class Counsel and on Fannie Mae’s attorneys, as identified on Page 7 of this Notice. The procedure for objecting is described below. This notice contains summary information with respect to the Settlement. The complete terms and conditions of the Settlement are set forth in a Settlement Agreement and Release (“Settlement Agreement”). Capitalized terms used in this Notice, but not defined in this Notice, have the meanings assigned to them in the Settlement Agreement. The Settleme...